Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 3 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Re: Bi-amplification? subject hijack
Ken.C #217228 08/04/08 06:17 PM
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 274
local
Offline
local
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 274
Utility is one thing; customer demand is another. Sometimes they coincide, sometimes they don't.

Re: Bi-amplification? subject hijack
anthony11 #217234 08/04/08 07:00 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,877
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,877
good point.


-David
Re: Bi-amplification? subject hijack
terzaghi #217255 08/04/08 08:44 PM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,349
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,349
It's a fact that your M60's support it. So if your receiver supports it amd you've got the extra channels and the speaker wire lying around, why not try it? It won't cost you anything, and you're certainly not going to cause any harm to the system.

Maybe it'll sound better. Maybe it'll sound exactly the same. Maybe it'll sound worse.

Whatever the outcome is, you can easily decide for yourself.

As I said, I believe that my M80's sound a tiny bit better when (pseudo) bi-amped. That's all it took for me. Is it in my head? Maybe, maybe not. But that's all that the enjoyment of music is anyway.


M80v2 | VP150v2 | QS8v2
SVS Pci+ 20-39
Emotiva UMC-1 & LPA-1
M22ti + T-Amp, in the Office
Re: Bi-amplification? subject hijack
PeterChenoweth #217383 08/05/08 12:41 PM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 868
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 868
I have to agree with Peter, try it and decide for your self if you like what you hear.


Dave
Re: Bi-amplification? subject hijack
DaveG #217385 08/05/08 01:05 PM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
But do keep in mind that your mind can create its own reality.

Re: Bi-amplification? subject hijack
pmbuko #257811 04/22/09 06:36 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 34
M
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
M
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 34
I love bring back threads from the dead \:\)

The search feature isn't great, true. I think the worst part is that it doesn't let you search past a year; Lots of info not searchable that needs to be asked again.

Back to biamping. Since I have two extra channels on the MPS-2, I'll biamp my M60's with Canare 4S11 wire. I don't have an external crossover but I'll give it a shot anyway since I have two Amp modules sitting idle. At least they are separate amps with independent power supplies.

Re: Bi-amplification? subject hijack
mistico #257816 04/22/09 06:43 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
J
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
J
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
Try it both ways and let us know your thoughts.


Jason
M80 v2
VP160 v3
QS8 v2
PB13 Ultra
Denon 3808
Samsung 85" Q70
Re: Bi-amplification? subject hijack
jakewash #257833 04/23/09 12:33 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840
Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840
Likes: 13
Mistico, don't waste your time. I had the MPS-1,as most know, that kept shutting down at louder levels. Lonnie at Emotiva said to try bi-amping by removing the clip on my speaker terminals and use one amp for the woofers, and the other for the upper drivers.

I told him that others say this is not 'true' bi-amping because of the crossover in the speakers. He said everyone at Axiom telling me that was nuts.

I will say that there was absolutely "no" difference. Any gain, was so minimal a person could not audibly notice.


M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350
AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85


Re: Bi-amplification? subject hijack
SirQuack #257855 04/23/09 03:16 AM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 845
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 845
Actually, you are all wrong. Bi-amping (two amps together) originated shortly, after the advent of 4 ohm speakers.
This allowed owner's of 4 ohm speakers to continiously enjoy their music, using the second amp..........after the first amp would shut down. ;\)


LIFE: "Choices, balance, and timing"

(Larryism)
Re: Bi-amplification? subject hijack
LT61 #257882 04/23/09 06:52 AM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 34
M
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
M
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 34
I have a few questions that will answer certain things for me.

The M60/M80's have posts for biamping. After reading, now understand the differences between passive-biamping and active-biamping(true biamping)
My questions are:

1. Do the M60/M80's have a crossover for the lower frequencies/bottom half and one for upper frequencies, 2 crossovers total?

2. If they have 2 crossovers, is the bottom one connected only to lower binding posts and the top one to the top binding posts, or do both sets of binding posts go to the same crossover?

If each set of binding posts go to separate crossovers, I'll do passive biamping to try out at least. If they both go to the same crossover, then I won't bother.

Thanks for all the info on this.

Page 3 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,484
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 684 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4