Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
M22 or M3
#236136 12/21/08 12:10 AM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 45
L
buff
OP Offline
buff
L
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 45
I want to get some speakers for my bedroom where my computer is and I end up spending a lot of time. I have M80s in my HT room but need something small but full for the bedroom. Which is a more full range speaker the M22 or M3?

Re: M22 or M3
Larry7995 #236138 12/21/08 12:26 AM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,463
Likes: 1
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,463
Likes: 1
Spec-wise, the M22s play lower, but the M3s have a little bit of a boost around 80 Hz, giving the impression of more extension. I haven't personally heard the M22s, but have the M3s.


***********
"Nothin' up my sleeve. . ." --Bullwinkle J. Moose
Re: M22 or M3
St_PatGuy #236141 12/21/08 01:38 AM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 395
devotee
Offline
devotee
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 395
I have both and use the M22s with a sub for my computer speakers and they are fantastic. With the sub off they are somewhat less fantastic. The M3s don't quite have the clarity but impress without a sub. I use those alone for workouts.

If the bulk of your music is compressed (either before or after the CD pressing) go with the M3s. For dedicated listening I find the M22s really do benefit from a sub, significantly adding to expense and space req'd.


M80s/VP160/QS8s/EP350; M22s; M3s.
Re: M22 or M3
doormat #236142 12/21/08 01:47 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
J
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
J
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
I sometimes turn up the bass settings a couple db for the M22s when they are on their own, it basically mimics the M3 curve and I still get the detail and clarity they offer, but most of the time I just run the M22 on their own as is, I love the detail.


Jason
M80 v2
VP160 v3
QS8 v2
PB13 Ultra
Denon 3808
Samsung 85" Q70
Re: M22 or M3
jakewash #236144 12/21/08 02:13 AM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,898
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,898
I ran M3s in our loft for a few weeks before installing them outside and can advocate for how good they sound without a sub (for music). I think you'd be very happy with them in a setup like you describe.

Jason


Epic 80-800: HG Cherry
Re: M22 or M3
Larry7995 #236163 12/21/08 02:47 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
Larry, the implication of your "full range" question is that you'll be using the speakers without a sub. If that's the case, I would recommend that you get the M22s despite subjective impressions of a "fuller" bass with the M3s. In the past(before I got the EP500 which especially helps with pipe organ music and some LFE in movies)I often used the M22s for music without a sub and got good bass(with room reinforcement)down to about 50Hz and much weaker but still usable response at 40Hz. This was sufficient for nearly all music, which has little content below 40Hz.

The impedance curves from the NRC indicate that the M22 enclosure is tuned about 4-5Hz lower than that of the M3 and therefore has a slightly lower "real" bass extension, although the M3 elevated response around 100Hz gives an impression of greater bass fullness.


-----------------------------------

Enjoy the music, not the equipment.


Re: M22 or M3
JohnK #236182 12/21/08 05:53 AM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 45
L
buff
OP Offline
buff
L
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 45
thanks for the info!

Re: M22 or M3
Larry7995 #236206 12/21/08 05:21 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,270
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,270
Hi Larry,

To add to the previous posts, you can definitely use the bass boost with a pair of M22s. They'll accept at least 3 dB or more of bass boost without complaint.

Another option is to wall-mount the M22s. During a double-blind listening session at Axiom, I was knocked out by the surprising amount of bass I heard from a pair of wall-mounted M22s. The wall behind them supplied lots of bass boost.

The M3s are still an excellent choice and are relatively more compact.

Regards,


Alan Lofft,
Axiom Resident Expert (Retired)
Re: M22 or M3
alan #236264 12/21/08 09:56 PM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 845
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 845
 Quote:
I was knocked out by the surprising amount of bass I heard


That might be TOO much bass


LIFE: "Choices, balance, and timing"

(Larryism)
Re: M22 or M3
alan #236266 12/21/08 10:15 PM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 32
H
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
H
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 32
This wont be a scientific review but I own M22s and my parents own M3s. M3s sound very nice but in my opinion the midrange is too recessed. They sound GREAT with blues/jazz/ and artists like jack johnson but was a lil underwhelmed with less "bassy" music. I could just be used to the M22's sound though and biased towards their forward sound.



Last edited by hietpas; 12/21/08 10:24 PM. Reason: Recently got off combat patrol

Denon 3808, M22s, M2s, VP100, Hsu sub
Re: M22 or M3
hietpas #236405 12/23/08 01:01 AM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 185
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 185
My first Axiom purchase 5 years ago was M3s and frankly I didn't care for them at all. They sounded un-detailed compared to some Atlantic Tech small bookshelves I was moving to the rear to replace some old dolby era surrounds.

Luckily I used the 30 day return program and got M22s. It made all the difference. Now the SVS sub is the only non Axiom speaker in my setup.


Whose avatar should I borrow next?
Re: M22 or M3
wilwom #236434 12/23/08 03:12 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840
Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840
Likes: 13
Your right hietpas, it depends on the type of music your listening to, many rave about the m3's over the 22's.


M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350
AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85


Re: M22 or M3
SirQuack #238251 01/05/09 08:39 PM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 24
S
hobbyist
Offline
hobbyist
S
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 24
out of curiosity, why has noone mentioned the audiobytes if the primary listening is done via the computer?

Re: M22 or M3
schizm42 #238252 01/05/09 08:44 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458
My understanding of the original post is that although the speakers might be driven by a computer, the OP was looking for full-range speakers to fill his bedroom.

I haven't heard the Audiobytes, but it seems that they are geared more for nearfield listening..i.e..while sitting at a computer desk.


::::::: No disrespect to Axiom, but my favorite woofer is my yellow lab :::::::
Re: M22 or M3
MarkSJohnson #238261 01/05/09 09:09 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
J
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
J
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
The Audiobytes are a great speaker but if you want to fill the room with sound and not just the listening area, then you need the bigger speakers.


Jason
M80 v2
VP160 v3
QS8 v2
PB13 Ultra
Denon 3808
Samsung 85" Q70
Re: M22 or M3
jakewash #238328 01/06/09 04:29 AM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 45
L
buff
OP Offline
buff
L
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 45
I have a 10 year old 100 watt per channel Kenwood stereo receiver to push them, I just spend a lot of time on the computer and my main system is in the other room. I will probably get the M22s one of these days.

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,480
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 1,046 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4