![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) FLAC vs MP3 (Stereo, Joint Stereo, Dual Channel)
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,569
connoisseur
|
OP
connoisseur
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,569 |
Ok, I know that the FLAC vs MP3 thing has been done to death but in comparing things for myself I found that not all MP3 rips of the same bitrate are created equal. So I’m posting this in hopes to add something to the discussion that doesn’t come up here that often.
Before deciding how to rip my CDs I did some testing and ended up getting an education on MP3 ripping. Initially I used Media Monkey to rip a track to FLAC, MP3 128 and 320. I listened to the FLAC rip to get a baseline and then set them to random play. Wow was there a difference. I could pick out both MP3 tracks instantly. No way do I have “golden ears” so I set about to find out what happened.
Turns out, something I didn’t realize, that there are other factors than source quality and bitrate which determine the quality of the MP3 file you get. Apparently different encoders produce slightly different results but what I was noticing was the difference in the method of stereo encoding.
I did some listening tests with my Sennheiser HD600 headphones hooked up to my Denon 2807 with the music being played from my NAS via SoundBlaster X-Fi Extreme audio on a MSI P7N Diamond motherboard hooked up to the Denon with coax (SPDIF) sending 24 bit 96KHz PCM.
I chose 3 tracks:
1. Dire Straits : Calling Elvis (On Every Street, Warner Remasters) 2. Antonio Vivaldi : The Four Seasons, Spring Concerto No. 1 in E Major, (HDC Classics) 3. After the Fire : Der Kommissar (80s Pop Hits, Sony Music)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Don’t want the boring details you can skip to the conclusion at the end -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I used Media Monkey to encode each track to the following with the file size listed for “Calling Elvis“:
1. FLAC - 38.8MB 2. MP3 Stereo 128 - 5.9MB 3. MP3 Stereo 320 - 14.8MB 4. MP3 Joint Stereo 128 - 5.9MB 5. MP3 Joint Stereo 320 - 14.8MB 6. MP3 Dual Channel 128 - 5.9MB 7. MP3 Dual Channel 320 - 14.9 MB
For the first test I listened to “Der Kommissar” figuring it was the worst recorded track (turned out it’s not a bad recording). First I listened to the FLAC to get a baseline and then hit random play and tried to figure out if it was the FLAC or an MP3. As each MP3 played I eliminated it from the playlist and continued. I didn’t try to guess but only called the track an MP3 if I was sure it wasn’t the FLAC version. Here were the results:
1. FLAC - NA 2. MP3 Stereo 128 - couldn’t tell 3. MP3 Stereo 320 - couldn’t tell 4. MP3 Joint Stereo 128 - MP3 5. MP3 Joint Stereo 320 - MP3 6. MP3 Dual Channel 128 - MP3 7. MP3 Dual Channel 320 - MP3
Numbers 4-7 were very easy to spot. Unsure on 1-3 so I didn’t make a call.
For the next tests I listened to the FLAC version of “Der Kommissar” and “Spring Concerto” using blind A/B comparisons of the FLAC vs each other rip with the following results in this order:
“Der Kommissar”/”Spring Concerto”
1. FLAC - NA/NA 2. MP3 Stereo 128 - MP3/couldn’t tell 3. MP3 Stereo 320 - couldn’t tell/couldn’t tell 4. MP3 Joint Stereo 128 - MP3/MP3 5. MP3 Joint Stereo 320 - MP3/couldn’t tell 6. MP3 Dual Channel 128 - MP3/MP3 7. MP3 Dual Channel 320 - MP3/MP3
For the next test I A/B compared “Der Kommissar and “Spring Concerto” FLACs vs each other rip listening for any differences knowing which track I was listening to with the following results in this order:
“Der Kommissar”/”Spring Concerto”
1. FLAC - NA/NA 2. MP3 Stereo 128 - MP3/MP3 3. MP3 Stereo 320 - MP3/MP3 4. MP3 Joint Stereo 128 - MP3/MP3 5. MP3 Joint Stereo 320 - MP3/MP3 6. MP3 Dual Channel 128 - MP3/MP3 7. MP3 Dual Channel 320 - MP3/MP3
Next I did a blind A/B comparison of the FLAC vs each other rip of “Calling Elvis” with the following results:
1. FLAC - NA 2. MP3 Stereo 128 - MP3 3. MP3 Stereo 320 - couldn’t tell 4. MP3 Joint Stereo 128 - MP3 5. MP3 Joint Stereo 320 - MP3 6. MP3 Dual Channel 128 - MP3 7. MP3 Dual Channel 320 - MP3
I then re-compared the FLAC and MP3 Stereo 320 rip listening for differences and could detect some. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Conclusion
I have way to much time on my hands. (please add corollaries as you wish).
MP3 Dual Channel - Could easily tell the difference with FLAC at both 128 and 320.
Easily identifiable as MP3 w/o any direct comparison or training on what to listen for. Vocals and upper bass/midrange concentrated in left side with high and very low frequencies playing from both sides. 128 bit very harsh and piercing.
MP3 Joint Stereo - Easily detectable as MP3 only when source had accurate instrument placement.
Stereo separation very muddied at 128 somewhat less so at 320. Both 128 and 320 lacked 3-dimensionality if present in the source. Noticeable hissing on high notes with 128 less so with 320. Crosstalk between left and right side delayed causing an echo effect. Distinct sounds like multiple hands clapping together on the FLAC sound like one muffled hand clapping.
MP3 Stereo 128 bit - Difference between this and FLAC hard to detect without knowing what to listen for.
Lacked some dynamic impact and hissing became noticeable once I learned what to listen for.
MP3 Stereo 320 - Nearly indistinguishable from FLAC
I couldn’t tell the differences until I trained myself to hear them and even then it was tough w/o a direct A/B comparison. I probably couldn’t tell these apart except for the most extreme circumstances.
So one Moral is don’t be like me and automatically use the default settings on your MP3 encoder. For Media Monkey Stereo sounded much better than Joint Stereo and Dual Channel while still resulting in the same size files.
Second moral - Don’t teach yourself to hear the difference between FLAC and MP3 if you don’t want to keep noticing it later.
3M80 2M22 6QS8 2M2 1EP500 Sony BDP-S590 Panny-7000 Onkyo-3007 Carada-134 Xbox Buttkicker AS-EQ1
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: FLAC vs MP3 (Stereo, Joint Stereo, Dual Channel)
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786 |
Next week Same bat-time same bat-channel. Media Monkey flac vs EAC flac. Can the trained ear tell the difference ?
Stay tuned...
Fred
------- Blujays1: Spending Fred's money one bottle at a time, no two... Oh crap!
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: FLAC vs MP3 (Stereo, Joint Stereo, Dual Channel)
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,569
connoisseur
|
OP
connoisseur
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,569 |
Next week Same bat-time same bat-channel. Media Monkey flac vs EAC flac. Can the trained ear tell the difference ?
Stay tuned...
Trick question? ![wink ;\)](/boards/images/graemlins/default/wink.gif) The only reason I’ve used EAC over MM for FLAC extraction is the error correction built into EAC. MM is by far easier to setup and somewhat easier for basic ripping. However, there may be an episode where Media Monkey meets AudialsOne. Can you feel the excitement? ![sick](/boards/images/graemlins/default/sick.gif)
3M80 2M22 6QS8 2M2 1EP500 Sony BDP-S590 Panny-7000 Onkyo-3007 Carada-134 Xbox Buttkicker AS-EQ1
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: FLAC vs MP3 (Stereo, Joint Stereo, Dual Channel)
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786 |
Actually it wasn't a trick question. I am curious to know what all that error correction gets you. MM is dead simple and at 2-3 minutes a disc, fast.
Fred
------- Blujays1: Spending Fred's money one bottle at a time, no two... Oh crap!
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: FLAC vs MP3 (Stereo, Joint Stereo, Dual Channel)
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,569
connoisseur
|
OP
connoisseur
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,569 |
Here’s a pretty good explanation of how EAC works. http://wiki.hydrogenaudio.org/index.php?title=Exact_Audio_CopyIt also uses Accuraterip to verify the accuracy of your rips. http://www.accuraterip.com/In a nutshell EAC takes a lot (and I mean a lot) longer to rip than Media Monkey or any other ripper that I know of. Unlike any other ripper I know of when EAC is done you will know if you have a 100% perfect rip of each track or not and it will leap tall buildings to try and get one. I started using it because the general consensus was that it’s the most accurate CD ripper available. Since I wasn’t in a hurry to rip everything I have (which isn’t much) and I’m ripping not just to listen but to archive/backup my CD collection I wanted to be as sure as possible I was storing accurate rips. Based on my personal testing if I were copying just to listen I would use Stereo MP3 at 320 bits. But since I’m archiving I chose to use FLAC so I can recreate the original data if needed. This has already paid off since I dropped my Chill out in Paris case the other day and gouged one disk. Since I have a perfect backup I just burned a new copy to replace the damaged one. Now I just need to find a way to rip my SACDs before I damage them.
3M80 2M22 6QS8 2M2 1EP500 Sony BDP-S590 Panny-7000 Onkyo-3007 Carada-134 Xbox Buttkicker AS-EQ1
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: FLAC vs MP3 (Stereo, Joint Stereo, Dual Channel)
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,077 Likes: 7
Founder, Axiom Upgrade Club shareholder in the making
|
Founder, Axiom Upgrade Club shareholder in the making
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,077 Likes: 7 |
All of this talk of ripping made me read this as "Chili out in Paris" at first.
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: FLAC vs MP3 (Stereo, Joint Stereo, Dual Channel)
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,569
connoisseur
|
OP
connoisseur
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,569 |
All of this talk of ripping made me read this as "Chili out in Paris" at first.
Being dyslexic you made me look to make sure I didn’t really type it that way. ![laugh \:D](/boards/images/graemlins/default/laugh.gif)
3M80 2M22 6QS8 2M2 1EP500 Sony BDP-S590 Panny-7000 Onkyo-3007 Carada-134 Xbox Buttkicker AS-EQ1
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: FLAC vs MP3 (Stereo, Joint Stereo, Dual Channel)
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,877
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,877 |
thanks for this great comparison.
-David
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: FLAC vs MP3 (Stereo, Joint Stereo, Dual Channel)
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,898
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,898 |
Thanks Dean - enjoyed reading through that as well (until I realized I ripped all my songs in 320 Joint Stereo). I did 3 blind listening tests before making that decision and couldn't pick any of them out, so maybe your ears are a bit more golden than you give yourself credit for! ![smile \:\)](/boards/images/graemlins/default/smile.gif)
Epic 80-800: HG Cherry
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: FLAC vs MP3 (Stereo, Joint Stereo, Dual Channel)
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 484
devotee
|
devotee
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 484 |
320 Joint... you sure that wasn't 420 joint that you ripped? ![wink ;\)](/boards/images/graemlins/default/wink.gif) Great post Dean; thanks for that.
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,949
Posts442,507
Members15,619
|
Most Online2,082 Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
0 members (),
780
guests, and
3
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|