|
|
 Re: DTS vs. Dolby Digital
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441 |
Semi's back! After 3 months almost to the day, too! 
|
|
|
Re: DTS vs. Dolby Digital
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,859
connoisseur
|
|
connoisseur
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,859 |
Semi, did you bring Sushi with you?
|
|
|
Re: DTS vs. Dolby Digital
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
|
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441 |
I deleted those exact words from my post after I previewed it. 
|
|
|
Re: DTS vs. Dolby Digital
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 737
aficionado
|
|
aficionado
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 737 |
He's locked in my trunk, actually.
|
|
|
Re: DTS vs. Dolby Digital
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,351
connoisseur
|
|
connoisseur
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,351 |
Sound engineers tend to pay better attention to DTS tracks, so they sound better.
However, if you listen to a DD5.1 or DTS with the same master, then DTS does sometimes sound more refined, but the difference is not as noticeable.
Still, I pick DTS over DD5.1
|
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,484
Members15,617
| |
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
|
0 members (),
1,188
guests, and
3
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|
|
