Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 4 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Re: Sound of Receivers
ClubNeon #289185 01/29/10 04:53 PM
H
htnut
Unregistered
htnut
Unregistered
H
 Originally Posted By: ClubNeon
I think the most telling point is that it is never the equipment makers who go on about how their gear sounds so much better than another maker, or even within their own product line. They just list the specs, and the things they've done which are supposed to improve the sound. It is left to the consumers and the reviewers to express the words about how much more chocolaty this new fooswuzzle is than its nearest competitor.

The few companies which do spout superlatives about their products are the ones I just seem to reflexively avoid because their claims seem so outrageous.


Good point, most of the claims aren't actually coming from the manufacturers, although they are stand to benefit the most.

So does it all come back to the consumers & reviewers hearing what they want or think they should hear? Have they simply been influenced by what they see and read?

I wish someone would do a proper test and help put this issue to rest, but I don't think the manufacturers and dealers would like it.

Re: Sound of Receivers
MarkSJohnson #289190 01/29/10 05:29 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,443
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,443
 Originally Posted By: MarkSJohnson
If it was helpful, give THIS forum the credit! \:\)
\:D


"A fanatic is someone who can't change his mind and won't change the subject" Churchill
Re: Sound of Receivers
#289193 01/29/10 05:46 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466
There is this (in)famous double-blind amplifier test, which shows a $6000 amp to sound same as a $200 amp: http://bruce.coppola.name/audio/Amp_Sound.pdf


Pioneer PDP-5020FD, Marantz SR6011
Axiom M5HP, VP160HP, QS8
Sony PS4, surround backs
-Chris
Re: Sound of Receivers
ClubNeon #289194 01/29/10 05:53 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,443
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,443
 Originally Posted By: ClubNeon
There is this (in)famous double-blind amplifier test, which shows a $6000 amp to sound same as a $200 amp: http://bruce.coppola.name/audio/Amp_Sound.pdf

I came to this conclusion years ago after my first big Receiver purchase being a near top of the line Yamaha. After making that purchase, I bought a lesser priced amp for the living room. I couldn't tell any difference and at the levels we listen - there was no reason for the extra wattage. My latest purchase was ~$400 Yamaha that I picked up because it decodes the latest - DTS HD - etc.


"A fanatic is someone who can't change his mind and won't change the subject" Churchill
Re: Sound of Receivers
Argon #289198 01/29/10 06:40 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015
I could tell a world of difference in sound between the only 2 receivers I've ever used. Both in 2 channel stereo mode.

1) Sony STR-DH500 $160
2) Pioneer VSX-21TXH. $630

Edit: The Sony just had a lot less power and couldn't drive the speakers nearly as good as the Pioneer can. After swapping receivers, I could hear a lot more bass coming from the M22's.

Last edited by CatBrat; 01/29/10 07:17 PM.
Re: Sound of Receivers
CatBrat #289199 01/29/10 06:46 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
Conversely, I don't think I could really tell a difference between my ancient Toshiba silver face early 80s vintage receiver and my H/K AVR525, or my late 90s vintage stereo Marantz.


I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
Re: Sound of Receivers
ClubNeon #289202 01/29/10 07:29 PM
H
htnut
Unregistered
htnut
Unregistered
H
 Originally Posted By: ClubNeon
There is this (in)famous double-blind amplifier test, which shows a $6000 amp to sound same as a $200 amp: http://bruce.coppola.name/audio/Amp_Sound.pdf


Nice read, thanks! That is the type of experiment I've been dying to perform. I would make it even easier on the participants though. Personally, I would not reveal the makes/models prior to or during the test, and I'd simply ask them a) if they could hear a difference and b) which one they preferred. Of course I would need to A/B the same unit against itself as well and see how the results compared to the A/B of different units.

Re: Sound of Receivers
CatBrat #289207 01/29/10 07:44 PM
H
htnut
Unregistered
htnut
Unregistered
H
 Originally Posted By: CatBrat
I could tell a world of difference in sound between the only 2 receivers I've ever used. Both in 2 channel stereo mode.

1) Sony STR-DH500 $160
2) Pioneer VSX-21TXH. $630

Edit: The Sony just had a lot less power and couldn't drive the speakers nearly as good as the Pioneer can. After swapping receivers, I could hear a lot more bass coming from the M22's.


Did you hear a difference at all listening levels or just high volume? Also, I wonder if the different (presumably better) DAC in the Pioneer is contributing as well...

Re: Sound of Receivers
#289209 01/29/10 07:52 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015
I didn't have both at the same time, so I couldn't A/B, and went by memory. I remember when listening with the Sony that there was clarity of sound in the mid and upper range, but wasn't surprised with the lack of bass since these were M22's. Listened to them for about a week this way. After hooking up the Pioneer and listening to the same source material, I was amazed with the amount of bass coming out of these speakers. I played them both at various volume levels, and I know that volume wasn't a factor. As far as both at low volume, I don't remember the difference, so I'm referring mostly to the higher volumes.

Re: Sound of Receivers
CatBrat #289216 01/29/10 08:25 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 110
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 110
I bought a Yamaha way back when (HDMI didn't exist, and TV's were only HD ready) and started my first home theater. 8 years later, the left surround channel went. So rather than buy a new receiver I bought a used amp - Anthem MCA 20 - for $250. It was $1500 when new the guy told me and I later verified. So this started me thinking I wanted to go with separates and I started acquiring more. Next one, an Anthem PVA7 for $450 which new was $2200. I liked the Anthem idea because the build quality was excellent and they were a Canadian company which made me feel good. I started looking for pre-pro's and to my shock nothing out there was a reasonable deal. A good pre-pro was the same as a top end receiver. So this made me start looking at cheap, but new, receivers to act as a pre-pro to the amp's. Vicious circle of this but not that and what about and don't forget cables and more power outlets and two more dedicated 20 amp circuits.

Finally, sold the MCA 20 for $750, sold the PVA7 for $1000 because audiogon.com guys love that stuff.

Bought a used RX-V3800 which has lots of power, HMDI, latest decoding, ABT 1010 chip for scaling all for the low low price of $350 because one HDMI port didn't work (does now).

Used the left over money (plus some) and got the M60's and a new EP350.

My point. At no time did the sound change for the better until I got the M60's. All the amplification before it had no impact. I'm stickin with receivers until the number of channels I need cannot be supported in a single chassis or a single power outlet.


HG Cherry M60's,VP150,Qs8's,EP350
Page 4 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,984
Posts442,691
Members15,643
Most Online2,699
Aug 8th, 2024
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,849
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 595 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4