Epinion Reviews of Axiom M3Ti Speakers
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,749 Likes: 37
connoisseur
|
OP
connoisseur
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,749 Likes: 37 |
I was kicking around the Epinions.com site and read an awful and absurd review of my personal favorite Axiom speakers, the M3Tis. I wrote a review under my humble name de guerre, "Electrodolt," because they don't accept names which start with a numeral such as the 2x6spds. Anyway, those of you who have experience with M3s might want to put in your own 2 Cents. I did.
Enjoy the Music. Trust your ears. Laugh at Folks Who Claim to Know it All.
|
|
|
Re: Epinion Reviews of Axiom M3Ti Speakers
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420 |
I will guess it was done by one of the semi-regular AVS guys, Monte, that seems to have a hate on for the M3 due to it's lack of a 'true' crossover and also has bashed the rest of the Axiom lineup without ever hearing any other Axiom speaker last I remember anything from him.
Jason M80 v2 VP160 v3 QS8 v2 PB13 Ultra Denon 3808 Samsung 85" Q70
|
|
|
Re: Epinion Reviews of Axiom M3Ti Speakers
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,116
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,116 |
I have read that before. It is a pretty long review. The M3's are still a nice sounding speaker for the price though.
Has there been ever an explanation on why Ian decided to go this route with the design of the M3 and M50 and to what benefits it had over any other design versions during R&D?
I’m armed and I’m drinking. You don’t want to listen to advice from me, amigo.
-Max Payne
|
|
|
Re: Epinion Reviews of Axiom M3Ti Speakers
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,928
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,928 |
I don't think anyone could read that review seriously without concluding there is an agenda behind it.
Half of communication is listening. You can't listen with your mouth.
|
|
|
Re: Epinion Reviews of Axiom M3Ti Speakers
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654 |
Yeah, that "review" was mentioned here before and I read it a couple years ago. I was especially amused by the paragraph that began "I hate having to write this negative review about Axiom...". A bigger lie there never was!
Among other points where his claims conflict with listening reports and lab measurements done by others, his report of distortion in the upper harmonics of the mid-woofer(due to the lack of a crossover, of course)is contrary to the NRC measurements in the SoundStage review, where the 2-5KHz distortion was almost immeasurably low(for a speaker), on the order of 0.5%.
-----------------------------------
Enjoy the music, not the equipment.
|
|
|
Re: Epinion Reviews of Axiom M3Ti Speakers
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044 |
Weeeeellll.... the NRC, being a bunch of Canadians, is obviously lying.
I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
|
|
|
Re: Epinion Reviews of Axiom M3Ti Speakers
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,749 Likes: 37
connoisseur
|
OP
connoisseur
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,749 Likes: 37 |
Dr. House, the Axiom M3s, like the wonderful and hugely more expensive Reference 3ade capo i speakers, does not use a crossover for the woofer and only a part or two for the tweeter's crossover. The less that lies in the signal path the better. The M3 is designed to use the mechanical frequency roll off characteristics of the woofer to integrate it with the tweeter instead of an electronic cross-over. Simple is beautiful. I think it is this lack of a woofer cross-over which makes the M3 so special.
Don't think less of the M3 just because it has no electronics between the signal and the woofer.
Enjoy the Music. Trust your ears. Laugh at Folks Who Claim to Know it All.
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,479
Members15,617
|
Most Online2,082 Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
0 members (),
682
guests, and
1
robot. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|