M80's: Recevier, or Recevier+amp?
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 84
old hand
|
OP
old hand
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 84 |
I'm looking to pickup 3-M80's as part of my home theater (fronts +center). To drive them, I was planning on using the soon to be released Denon 4311ci with ~130w/channel. A friend suggested that I drop back to the Denon 3311ci and add an Emotiva XPA-3 to power the fronts and let the 3311 drive the four QS8 surrounds. What do you all think? Which is a better solution for use with the m80's? I'll be using them for movies, but my son is a musician with musician ears so musicality will rule the day in terms what we end up purchasing. I just need it loud.
Last edited by Scamp; 07/23/10 01:34 AM.
M22's x 3, QS8's x 4 SVS PC12-Plus, Denon 3311ci Ear-to-ear grin? Priceless!
|
|
|
Re: M80's: Recevier, or Recevier+amp?
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 463
devotee
|
devotee
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 463 |
Hi Scamp! Welcome to Axiom forum! I am here to give you a great welcome to the Axiom family! Taking in consideration I am a great noob on HT matter, can't really help you. I will leave that to the pros around here. I gotta say! They are really helpful as my HT set is being setup right now, this is one thing I can say for sure!
Believe those who are seeking the truth. Doubt those who find it.
|
|
|
Re: M80's: Recevier, or Recevier+amp?
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,833
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,833 |
How big is your room? Either set up you have listed should serve you well. With the Denon being 130 watts and the Emo being 200 per it's really a toss up. Denon is known to have a very robust amp section.
There have been some, not all, folks running M80s and Emo amps that have had problems. Not so with Denon and M80s.
Rick
"A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity." Sigmund Freud
|
|
|
Re: M80's: Recevier, or Recevier+amp?
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,928
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,928 |
You could actually try the 3311 WITHOUT a power amp first, then if you feel you need an external amp, go for it. Alot depends on your listening level. As Rick mentioned, there have been some problems with some Emo amps and M80s(not sure which specific amp).
Half of communication is listening. You can't listen with your mouth.
|
|
|
Re: M80's: Recevier, or Recevier+amp?
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840 Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840 Likes: 13 |
I would try the Denon as is first before getting extra outboard amps. The difference between 130 watts and 200 is less than 3dB's, which is hardly noticable. Considering that the M80's are very loud at 1 watt/1 meter, you will unlikely notice any difference.
M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350 AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85
|
|
|
Re: M80's: Recevier, or Recevier+amp?
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786 |
The Denon will be able to deliver in the range of 200w into 4 Ohms. As sirquack points out, that will get your M80s plenty loud with no clipping.
Fred
------- Blujays1: Spending Fred's money one bottle at a time, no two... Oh crap!
|
|
|
Re: M80's: Recevier, or Recevier+amp?
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 84
old hand
|
OP
old hand
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 84 |
Hi Scamp! Welcome to Axiom forum! Thanks! It's a divided room. 22'x14 for the theater area with a half wall into a similar sized space. You could actually try the 3311 WITHOUT a power amp first, then if you feel you need an external amp, go for it. I'd have no idea if I need the external amp at all, assuming we are talking degrees of goodness. I have no real point of reference since all I have now are the speakers built into the old TV. Plus I need a way to decide if I'm better off with the 4311ci over the 3311. Unless of course I looked at the 4311 with the amp. While we are on the subject, obviously there are amps with a much higher price tag than the XP-3 what do they buy? Just more power/volume?
M22's x 3, QS8's x 4 SVS PC12-Plus, Denon 3311ci Ear-to-ear grin? Priceless!
|
|
|
Re: M80's: Recevier, or Recevier+amp?
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786 |
Bragging rights. The illusion of better. A very nice car and mansion for the guy that owns the expensive amp company.
Buy the receiver with the features you need/want. With 125w the 3311 will give you all the power you ever need.
Fred
------- Blujays1: Spending Fred's money one bottle at a time, no two... Oh crap!
|
|
|
Re: M80's: Recevier, or Recevier+amp?
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 769
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 769 |
My room is a little smaller than yours 20x11 and my denon is 105W/ch. I only play at max volume when I want to show off a little or upset my neighbor and only for a short period of time. Way to loud! I would probably go with an external amp if my room would be 2 or 3 times this size. Use the $$$ from the amp to buy yourself other equipment, surrounds maybe or a sub?
Last edited by bdpf; 07/23/10 02:53 AM.
Bruno M80s/VP180/QS8s/EP600/AVR-890 ------------------------------------ "The problem is choice..."
|
|
|
Re: M80's: Recevier, or Recevier+amp?
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840 Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840 Likes: 13 |
Scamp, the majority of the time you will only be using 1-3 watts to play pretty loud, with brief jumps "maybe" up to 100 watts or so. I am not going to quote what JohnK says about unused headroom as I'm sure he will be along soon. The M80's are rated at 95dB's (that is very loud) "in room" using 1 watt at a 1 meter distance. So even at normal distances back from the M80's your still only going to be using a few watts most of the time.
M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350 AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85
|
|
|
Re: M80's: Recevier, or Recevier+amp?
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654 |
Scamp, welcome, and what I say about unused headroom is that it's simply that: unused. Get a receiver with the features that you want at the best price. Don't worry about maximum power ratings.
-----------------------------------
Enjoy the music, not the equipment.
|
|
|
Re: M80's: Recevier, or Recevier+amp?
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 84
old hand
|
OP
old hand
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 84 |
Thanks. I think that clears it up. In this case less is more.
Denon receiver, M80's, no amp, extra butter on the popcorn.
Thanks for that warm welcome everyone.
M22's x 3, QS8's x 4 SVS PC12-Plus, Denon 3311ci Ear-to-ear grin? Priceless!
|
|
|
Re: M80's: Recevier, or Recevier+amp?
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840 Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840 Likes: 13 |
wait for it....wait for it...her come the Denon setup questions...
M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350 AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85
|
|
|
Re: M80's: Recevier, or Recevier+amp?
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 84
old hand
|
OP
old hand
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 84 |
Not from me. I know the secret! BatPig. Not to mention I'll spend the days (weeks?) waiting for my M80 v3's to arrive obsessively reading every post on this forum.
M22's x 3, QS8's x 4 SVS PC12-Plus, Denon 3311ci Ear-to-ear grin? Priceless!
|
|
|
Re: M80's: Recevier, or Recevier+amp?
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786 |
For a second there I thought you were going to write that you read the manual. I had the number to the mancard police half dialed before I saw that it was forum posts you were reading.
Fred
------- Blujays1: Spending Fred's money one bottle at a time, no two... Oh crap!
|
|
|
Re: M80's: Recevier, or Recevier+amp?
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466 |
Hey, I read the manuals for everything I own. Usually in PDF format before I even buy it.
Pioneer PDP-5020FD, Marantz SR6011 Axiom M5HP, VP160HP, QS8 Sony PS4, surround backs -Chris
|
|
|
Re: M80's: Recevier, or Recevier+amp?
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,301
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,301 |
Reading a Denon manual and understanding it are two wholly separate things.
A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing.
|
|
|
Re: M80's: Recevier, or Recevier+amp?
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458 |
Either set up you have listed should serve you well. With the Denon being 130 watts and the Emo being 200 per it's really a toss up. Denon is known to have a very robust amp section. I thought the general consensus was that, if the volume is pushed, there were still advantages in using a separate amp because of the limiting factor of a single power supply of the receiver being used alone? I had assumed (as a real-world example) that if I bought three Outlaw Monoblocks at 200/wpc, I would gain headroom. Not necessarily because I've supplied my three front channels with 200/wpc instead of the 130/wpc my Denon offers... but because none of the four power supplies now being used are likely to start hitting their limits as quickly as just the single one available if the Denon is used alone.(?)
::::::: No disrespect to Axiom, but my favorite woofer is my yellow lab :::::::
|
|
|
Re: M80's: Recevier, or Recevier+amp?
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015 |
That would be my consensus as well. But probably only noticeable when that extra oomph is produced during explosions, etc, would be my guess.
|
|
|
Re: M80's: Recevier, or Recevier+amp?
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466 |
Reading a Denon manual and understanding it are two wholly separate things. I'll probably never own a Denon, but I'm tempted to give their manual a shot, just to see if it really is as bad as everyone makes it out to to be. Perhaps then I could be a little more helpful in Denon related threads too. But for now I have datasheets, and reference implementations for HDMI 1.4 chipsets to read up on.
Pioneer PDP-5020FD, Marantz SR6011 Axiom M5HP, VP160HP, QS8 Sony PS4, surround backs -Chris
|
|
|
Re: M80's: Recevier, or Recevier+amp?
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 84
old hand
|
OP
old hand
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 84 |
So the consensus is, for volume levels below "risk of long term hearing loss" I won't hear a difference between what the Denon can pump out and what the Denon+Amp can pump out to the M80's and I'll have plenty of extra room.
For example, I read a review for the DVD-A disk of the 1812 Overture. It warned of speakers not being able to handle the sudden volume change that accompanies the cannon fire. If I pair the M80's with a Denon 33xx/43xx receiver I won't have to worry about things like that correct?
M22's x 3, QS8's x 4 SVS PC12-Plus, Denon 3311ci Ear-to-ear grin? Priceless!
|
|
|
Re: M80's: Recevier, or Recevier+amp?
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015 |
I think my next receiver will be a Denon $1k+ because it seems to have more options built in than the Pioneers do.
|
|
|
Re: M80's: Recevier, or Recevier+amp?
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,444 Likes: 16
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,444 Likes: 16 |
Reading a Denon manual and understanding it are two wholly separate things. I'll probably never own a Denon, but I'm tempted to give their manual a shot, just to see if it really is as bad as everyone makes it out to to be. Perhaps then I could be a little more helpful in Denon related threads too. But for now I have datasheets, and reference implementations for HDMI 1.4 chipsets to read up on. Denon manuals aren't as bad as they are made out to be. They have the information you need, but you have to know how to interpret it. Much like any code book. Like the NEC, you need the guide book to go along with it. Unfortunately, Denon doesn't supply a guide book, but batpig has done well his. As to the OP's original question, you don't NEED the outboard amp. It's a matter of WANT. I would pass on the Emo stuff though, if you really WANT an amp.
|
|
|
Re: M80's: Recevier, or Recevier+amp?
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786 |
For example, I read a review for the DVD-A disk of the 1812 Overture. It warned of speakers not being able to handle the sudden volume change that accompanies the cannon fire. If I pair the M80's with a Denon 33xx/43xx receiver I won't have to worry about things like that correct?
Correct. Using this calculator we see that at 100Db average volume with 10 Db of head room the M80s will use 198 W of power. Note this is using Axiom's in room response of 95 db to account for room gain. I believe that the 43ll you were looking at will deliver this quite easily into 4 Ohms. Turn that down to a much more reasonable but still loud level of 85 db and you are using 6 watts. Give yourself 20 Db of headroom that may be demanded by the most dynamic of classical recordings (like the 1812 Oveture??) and you are using a whopping 62 watts peak. That means your 4311 will have around 140 watts in reserve that you will never use unless you move your system into a much bigger room. I don't know why people so happily ignore simple physics in their quest to spend thousands of dollars on amplification that, as John always points out, will not be used.
Last edited by fredk; 07/23/10 07:35 PM.
Fred
------- Blujays1: Spending Fred's money one bottle at a time, no two... Oh crap!
|
|
|
Re: M80's: Recevier, or Recevier+amp?
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458 |
Scamp, keep in mind that if it's an older CD (like, when the format was just emerging), sometimes those "warnings" were put on the discs as a marketing point. What early adopter could resist a warning that the recording was "so real, and so dynamic, that you have to be careful with it"?
I have a Billy Cobham CD like that....
::::::: No disrespect to Axiom, but my favorite woofer is my yellow lab :::::::
|
|
|
Re: M80's: Recevier, or Recevier+amp?
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 84
old hand
|
OP
old hand
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 84 |
Fredk:
That's exactly what I was looking for, err... Had I know what I needed to be looking for. Much thanks.
Physics. It works Bitches!
M22's x 3, QS8's x 4 SVS PC12-Plus, Denon 3311ci Ear-to-ear grin? Priceless!
|
|
|
Re: M80's: Recevier, or Recevier+amp?
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 93
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 93 |
If you don't have to have all the latest bells and whistles, they are blowing out the Pioneer SC-27 (it is now last years model) for less than $1000 U.S. Just a heads up for anyone looking for a good deal on a pretty powerful receiver.
I picked one up recently and I like it very much. It has the 140 watt Class D amps and drives my M80's very well. It seems to have a lot of dynamic power on tap, it never seems to run out of steam.
The latest Denon's do have a lot more bells and whistles though.
|
|
|
Re: M80's: Recevier, or Recevier+amp?
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786 |
Physics. It works Bitches! You are most welcome. Thanks for the new sig line.
Fred
------- Blujays1: Spending Fred's money one bottle at a time, no two... Oh crap!
|
|
|
Re: M80's: Recevier, or Recevier+amp?
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 84
old hand
|
OP
old hand
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 84 |
Physics. It works Bitches! You are most welcome. Thanks for the new sig line. I can't claim credit for that one. It and many other pity sayings came from XKCD
M22's x 3, QS8's x 4 SVS PC12-Plus, Denon 3311ci Ear-to-ear grin? Priceless!
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,482
Members15,617
|
Most Online2,082 Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
0 members (),
661
guests, and
4
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|