Re: Audioholics Ultimate Subwoofer Shootout
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044 |
Axiom declined to participate. That's the long and the short of it.
I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
|
|
|
Re: Audioholics Ultimate Subwoofer Shootout
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458 |
(As did, evidently, many other of the major players in the field)
::::::: No disrespect to Axiom, but my favorite woofer is my yellow lab :::::::
|
|
|
Re: Audioholics Ultimate Subwoofer Shootout
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 110
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 110 |
I would like to see SVS's new DSP controlled amp equipped subs tested. Not even SVS has data for these units on their site. A friend of mine has their PC-12NSD and it is far more accurate and sensitive than my Outlaw LFM-1 Plus.
M22 VP100 QS8 RX-V665 DMP-BD55 SMS-1 LFM-1+ LG47SL90
Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm.
|
|
|
Re: Audioholics Ultimate Subwoofer Shootout
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,116
connoisseur
|
OP
connoisseur
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,116 |
Any new subs to the market would be awesome to see. SVS is entering the vaunted PB12-Plus. As for new commercial subwoofers to the market, Rythmik Audio is entering a brand spanking new servo sub, the FV15HP which looks like a interesting product with some neat technology behind it.
I’m armed and I’m drinking. You don’t want to listen to advice from me, amigo.
-Max Payne
|
|
|
Re: Audioholics Ultimate Subwoofer Shootout
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 110
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 110 |
That is definitely some interesting tech but I wonder if the voice coils run a bit warm or even hot since they are controlled more tightly.
M22 VP100 QS8 RX-V665 DMP-BD55 SMS-1 LFM-1+ LG47SL90
Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm.
|
|
|
Re: Audioholics Ultimate Subwoofer Shootout
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466 |
There's an update on Audioholics about this shootout, and some insanity surrounding it. http://www.audioholics.com/news/editorials/subwoofer-shootoutIn the attached discussion it has been surmised that it was Axiom who was opposed to the groundplane measurements, and pulled advertising from the site.
Pioneer PDP-5020FD, Marantz SR6011 Axiom M5HP, VP160HP, QS8 Sony PS4, surround backs -Chris
|
|
|
Re: Audioholics Ultimate Subwoofer Shootout
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,569
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,569 |
Well Axiom advertising does seem to be missing from the site now. And come to think of it they haven’t shown up in the “Featured Review” section for awhile.
Wonder if it was, what all went into the decision to pull the advertising. Like they have some hard marketing numbers to indicate that the adds their just weren’t paying off. I for one first discovered Axiom through one of Audioholics recommended systems.
Hard to judge w/o all the facts but it does seem like Axiom has been creating a lot of PR problems for itself in the last year.
3M80 2M22 6QS8 2M2 1EP500 Sony BDP-S590 Panny-7000 Onkyo-3007 Carada-134 Xbox Buttkicker AS-EQ1
|
|
|
Re: Audioholics Ultimate Subwoofer Shootout
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420 |
No subtle hint there with the tower mentioned, wouldn't be too hard to figure out.
Jason M80 v2 VP160 v3 QS8 v2 PB13 Ultra Denon 3808 Samsung 85" Q70
|
|
|
Re: Audioholics Ultimate Subwoofer Shootout
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 912 Likes: 4
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 912 Likes: 4 |
I never put much stock in this stuff anyway since everyone has their favorites and no matter how many people are doing the judging, speaker comparisons are always very subjective. Over the years Audioholics always spoke highly of Axiom products and even visited their plant so I am somewhat surprised at the "falling out" although, I guess every company, from time to time, will change directions in their marketing.
As far as questionable PR is concerned, that doesn't bother me as much as when a company starts to cease communications with its customers about late or non-committed delivery dates on a product which has already been paid for. The forums are starting to fill up with comments like this about "ED", a company that might be "on the brink" located in a town "on the brink"(Newton, Iowa, featured on "Sixty Minutes" two Sundays ago).
That is when I would start to worry.
|
|
|
Re: Audioholics Ultimate Subwoofer Shootout
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,928
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,928 |
Kind of reminds me of the shootouts you see when they compare automobiles in magazines. You have a group of people who are interested in track times, another who is interested in bang-for-buck, others who's main focus is reliability or ride quality or economy....It always irks me when you read comments like "The xxxx blew everyone away on the track, so it should have won..."
In a subwoofer shootout, the reviewer imo would need to make it very clear what things they are judging/looking for...outright spl, accuracy, value, quality/reliability....otherwise you will get someone sending a Bugatti Veyron to a family sedan shootout.
Half of communication is listening. You can't listen with your mouth.
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,946
Posts442,492
Members15,617
|
Most Online2,082 Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
0 members (),
629
guests, and
2
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|