Re: J.P.'s office
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,471
axiomite
|
OP
axiomite
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,471 |
Effectiveness really depends on the type/design of study, but I'm no statistician. Overall, I'd say the meds we have are pretty good for the majority of people with depression. They could definitely be better, though, and the pipeline has stalled. There's not been anything really new in about 15 years, just a lot of "me-too" drugs (Company A has a product that sells, and other companies develop other meds in the same family) and minor tweaks on old meds (Now it's extended release! / Now it's the active metabolite, not the parent medicine! / Now it's the active isomer, not the racemic mixture! ....)
Plus, while I make my bread and butter as a Pez dispenser, I'm a big believer in psychotherapy. There is usually at least some psychotherapeutic process at work in my sessions, though I have heard of some psychiatrists who basically ask how the meds are working, if there are any side effects, and how many refills you have left. NEXT! Anyway, when a person is motivated, he/she can learn major, life-altering techniques, perspectives, attitudes, and behaviors with a good psychotherapist. It really is mind over mood, and it works.
Side effects of antidepressants aren't generally that bad, but the new generation of antipsychotics/mood stabilizers can be very rough: weight gain and secondary blood sugar elevations to the point of developing diabetes; increased cholesterol, permanent and irreversible involuntary muscle movements (though the chance is much less than that of the older generations of these meds) ....
Still, for the majority, the benefits outweigh the risks, as not everybody gets side effects, and some meds are much cleaner than others in the same family. However, the cleaner meds are not always as reliable as the meds with more side effects. So it's a mutual decision between the medic8r and the medic8d.
Bears, beets, Battlestar Galactica.
|
|
|
Re: J.P.'s office
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,357
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,357 |
It really is mind over mood, and it works. Yeppers- "That is why it is important, as I said, to understand the process, the ways of our own thinking. Self-knowledge cannot be gathered through anybody, through any book, through any confession, psychology, or psychoanalyst. It has to be found by yourself, because it is your life; and without the widening and deepening of that knowledge of the self, do what you will, alter any outward or inward circumstances, influences - it will ever be a breeding ground of despair, pain, sorrow. To go beyond the self-enclosing activities of the mind, you must understand them; and to understand them is to be aware of action in relationship, relationship to things, to people, and to ideas. In that relationship, which is the mirror, we begin to see ourselves, without any justification or condemnation; and from that wider and deeper knowledge of the ways of our own mind, it is possible to proceed further; then it is possible for the mind to be quiet, to receive that which is real." Jiddu Krishnamurti.
The only reasonable argument for owning a gun is to protect yourself from the police.
|
|
|
Re: J.P.'s office
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015 |
|
|
|
Re: J.P.'s office
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,357
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,357 |
The only reasonable argument for owning a gun is to protect yourself from the police.
|
|
|
Re: J.P.'s office
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,471
axiomite
|
OP
axiomite
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,471 |
Here's a knowledge throwdown I did by commenting on the death of Harvey Pekar. That coroner either is doing somebody a solid or is very dumb.
Bears, beets, Battlestar Galactica.
|
|
|
Re: J.P.'s office
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,928
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,928 |
You got THE last word on that one, JP.
Half of communication is listening. You can't listen with your mouth.
|
|
|
Re: J.P.'s office
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015 |
|
|
|
Re: J.P.'s office
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786 |
Lost track of this thread. Effectiveness really depends on the type/design of study, but I'm no statistician. True. I am no statistician either. It seems there are a number of more recent studies that suggest medication is less effective than thought by the medical community. It is certainly much less effective than the manufacturers would have you believe. I'm a big believer in psychotherapy. It works. In fact the one consistent theme in studies on depression is that medication and psychotherapy are much more effective than either on their own. Depression has many causes and many pathways. I think that it is much like autism, a spectrum of 'disorders'. My depression was situational: who I was married to. My Aunt's was hormonal and took the medical profession a good 40 years to figure out. For others it seems to be how the brain is wired, but even there, the neurological pathways are not always the same. The most fascinating recent research is around a part of the brain labeled area 25. It seems for a significant portion of people with 'un-treatable' depression. A single treatment of low level electrical stimulation to this part of the brain had immediate, significant, and lasting (somewhere around 4 months) effect. The research was undertaken by a Montreal neuro biologist and a Boston (I think) brain surgeon. The first round was very limited and they are not in their second round now. Depression sucks. Many treatments are only partially effective, the causes are complicated and it is socially unacceptable. In the recent surveys I have seen, only 30% of people are successfully treated. For the rest any treatment is only partially effective. Think on this. If an anti-depressant is 60% effective, it is considered a huge success. If you're broken arm is 60% fixed, you are on your way to see your lawyer. Looking from the outside in we have made large strides in treating depression in the last 50 years. From the inside 40% less depressed is still not anything approaching a good experience. This is not a slam on your profession JP, just my observation as an insider.
Fred
------- Blujays1: Spending Fred's money one bottle at a time, no two... Oh crap!
|
|
|
Re: J.P.'s office
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,471
axiomite
|
OP
axiomite
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,471 |
Hey, I just saw your post, Fred. Hadn't stepped into my Axiom Office in a while. You're right, the subjectivity built into my specialty is both a blessing (keeps it interesting and less monotonous) and a curse (means cures are usually elusive - we can only treat). I came back to post a link to a local Craigslist ad for a 1958 Harman Kardon tube tuner and tube amp. Thought it was interesting and that you guys would appreciate it.
Bears, beets, Battlestar Galactica.
|
|
|
Re: J.P.'s office
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,471
axiomite
|
OP
axiomite
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,471 |
Another fun day at the office. One of my patients just showed up in the lobby (without an appt) with lottery tickets affixed to his forehead. He had wrapped them up with tie-down straps.
Bears, beets, Battlestar Galactica.
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,489
Members15,617
|
Most Online2,082 Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
0 members (),
1,092
guests, and
2
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|