Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
M22 vs V100 center channel
#327475 11/03/10 08:05 PM
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 25
T
Tony Offline OP
hobbyist
OP Offline
hobbyist
T
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 25
Hello,
I'm still 'waffling' on the center speaker set-up for my new install. I'm definetely going with in/on wall M22's. I don't know whether to go with another M22 for the center or a VP100. The only difference is the mid-woofer arrangement, correct? Any thoughts / advice would be appreciated?
I'm using a Yamaha RXA2000 or Integra 70.2 - not decided yet.

The room is 1800 cu ft. 12 x 16 x 9

Thx,

Re: M22 vs V100 center channel
Tony #327477 11/03/10 08:16 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015
For sound quality, M22.
For aesthetics, VP100.

If it were me, I'd go with the VP150.

Re: M22 vs V100 center channel
CatBrat #327481 11/03/10 09:37 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
J
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
J
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
Inwall/onwall M2 above and below the screen would be my vote for both SQ(assuming M2 on/wall has same charcteristics as M2 bookshelf vs M22 bookshelf) and aesthetics.


Jason
M80 v2
VP160 v3
QS8 v2
PB13 Ultra
Denon 3808
Samsung 85" Q70
Re: M22 vs V100 center channel
jakewash #327482 11/03/10 09:46 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488
T
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
T
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488
Don't overthink it, Tony. Whatever you decide will be great. I'd agree with CatBrat that aesthetics are a consideration. If you're already doing inwall/onwall, I'd probably get a VP150, too. If you are doing the INWALL versions, I think the VP100 makes a lot more sense.


bibere usque ad hilaritatem
Re: M22 vs V100 center channel
Tony #327486 11/04/10 01:35 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
Tony, rather than simply the order of the drivers, the most significant difference would be the vertical orientation of the M22(or M2s, as Jason suggests). This leads to a wider and smoother horizontal dispersion and would be my suggestion.


-----------------------------------

Enjoy the music, not the equipment.


Re: M22 vs V100 center channel
JohnK #327492 11/04/10 10:31 AM
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 25
T
Tony Offline OP
hobbyist
OP Offline
hobbyist
T
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 25
Hello,
I apologize for my ignorance but am I reading correctly that you are suggesting a center speaker both above AND below my 65" Panasonic? I've never read or heard of that type application before.
My only reservation for using the VP150 is what I have read about some problems with off axis listening with the two tweeter arrangement with the VP 150.
You are right, maybe I'm over thinking this.

Thank you for your input,
Tony

Re: M22 vs V100 center channel
Tony #327495 11/04/10 01:45 PM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 769
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 769
The off-axis problem is common to horizontal speakers. It is why some folks have recommended using the M22 if you can accommodate it. The problem is that most of us can't.


Bruno
M80s/VP180/QS8s/EP600/AVR-890
------------------------------------
"The problem is choice..."
Re: M22 vs V100 center channel
bdpf #327496 11/04/10 01:49 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015
I have the VP100 and off to the side, at about 25 to 30 degrees, the volume is noticeably lower than in a narrow head on situation, such as a couch 10 to 12 feet back. I'm assuming the VP150 will increase that listening angle a little, but I haven't been able to prove that yet.

Re: M22 vs V100 center channel
CatBrat #327499 11/04/10 02:03 PM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 863
Likes: 1
C
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
C
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 863
Likes: 1
It is an age old issue in that center channels were designed as a convenience in setting up HTs as opposed to maximizing performance. I can recall back years ago when THX and surround sound came on the scene in home systems and they always recommended the same design speakers across the front sound stage, however, in most cases it just wasn't practical,hence, the horizontal center.

The new large horizontal speakers like the VP180 and its design goes a long way toward negating that disadvantage, however, because of its size, that, unfortunately, opens up another area of limited practicality in its usage.

Re: M22 vs V100 center channel
casey01 #327510 11/04/10 03:58 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488
T
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
T
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488
IMO, internet discontent with the VP150 is wildly overblown.

While I don't necessarily disagree with the premise of a vertical center channel, I think people tend to undervalue the very significant crossover changes that are made to horizontally-oriented speakers, especially in Axiom's case.

It's not just putting a traditional speaker on its side and living with a wider baffle; it's a whole new design. That's part of the reason why the VP100 is sealed; it's not an M22 arrayed differently - it is a different speaker.

And Alan has addressed the comb filtering / lobing assertions before.

I still maintain that speaker placement and room interaction are better places to focus your energy regarding the center channel than second-guessing R&D like Axiom's.


bibere usque ad hilaritatem
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,427
Posts432,915
Members15,427
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,437
SirQuack 13,693
CV 11,825
MarkSJohnson 11,451
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 125 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4