Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
M22 on wall vs. M22 free standing
#332121 12/21/10 03:04 AM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 72
P
pheare Offline OP
old hand
OP Offline
old hand
P
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 72
Hi all,

haven't been around for awhile. Just saw the M22 on wall. I am very intrigued, as don't have to pay for a stand and I think they would look very clean flanking my projector screen with a vp150 on wall.

Question is, are you giving up any sound quality going with the on walls vs. their free standing counterparts? The cabinet doesn't seem to have quite the depth of the free standing version.

Any comments?

Re: M22 on wall vs. M22 free standing
pheare #332122 12/21/10 03:51 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,649
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,649
PH, welcome back. Yes, the internal volume of the on-wall speaker is only about half that of the standard M22. So, the enclosure is tuned at a significantly higher bass frequency. The size of the enclosure, other factors being equal, has no effect above the bass range. Coupled with a good sub and crossed over above say 80Hz, there should be little or no overall difference in sound.


-----------------------------------

Enjoy the music, not the equipment.


Re: M22 on wall vs. M22 free standing
JohnK #332124 12/21/10 04:23 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,569
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,569
In general I agree with what John just said, however.

Quote:

Question is, are you giving up any sound quality going with the on walls vs. their free standing counterparts? The cabinet doesn't seem to have quite the depth of the free standing version.


IMO you do sacrifice sound quality with in walls because it limit’s how you can place the speakers both for bass response and more important for imaging. IMO a big advantage of using bookshelf speakers with a good subwoofer is that it let’s you place each type of speaker for it’s best performance. Using on/in wall speakers inherently limits you to wall mounting which has a profound effect on how the speakers perform (good or bad).

IMO free standing speakers are better for tweaking or re-tasking later as you build your system, but ultimately it depends on how you plan to grow you your system.


3M80 2M22 6QS8 2M2 1EP500 Sony BDP-S590 Panny-7000 Onkyo-3007 Carada-134 Xbox Buttkicker AS-EQ1
Re: M22 on wall vs. M22 free standing
grunt #332126 12/21/10 07:03 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
That's just your opinion, man.


In seriousness, the other two are right. You do sacrifice midbass with the on-walls; if I had the choice, I would use the in/on walls or the bookshelf models (I own bookshelves and on-walls, but I've never directly compared the two--nor can I right now).


I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
Re: M22 on wall vs. M22 free standing
Ken.C #332128 12/21/10 07:09 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,569
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,569
Originally Posted By: kcarlile

That's just your opinion, man.

Hence the "IMO" part I've highlighted for you: wink

Originally Posted By: grunt
IMO you do sacrifice sound quality with in walls because it limit’s how you can place the speakers both for bass response and more important for imaging.



3M80 2M22 6QS8 2M2 1EP500 Sony BDP-S590 Panny-7000 Onkyo-3007 Carada-134 Xbox Buttkicker AS-EQ1
Re: M22 on wall vs. M22 free standing
grunt #332129 12/21/10 07:11 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
Hence my comment.

Hence my comment.






Hence my comment.

wink


I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
Re: M22 on wall vs. M22 free standing
Ken.C #332131 12/21/10 07:56 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,649
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,649
Hence my first preference would still be the regular M22s with an inexpensive(like home made and practically free)set of stands.


-----------------------------------

Enjoy the music, not the equipment.


Re: M22 on wall vs. M22 free standing
JohnK #332136 12/21/10 01:07 PM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,463
Likes: 1
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,463
Likes: 1
Yeah. . . . . .hence!










Um, what are we talking about?


***********
"Nothin' up my sleeve. . ." --Bullwinkle J. Moose
Re: M22 on wall vs. M22 free standing
St_PatGuy #332139 12/21/10 01:46 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 72
P
pheare Offline OP
old hand
OP Offline
old hand
P
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 72
Thanks for the responses. In terms of tweaking the placement with freestanding - sure you can. But reality is, sub aside, the speakers are going to have to be in fairly specific spots - but of course there is room for a bit of movement.

What would you crossover the free standing m22's at? also, I assume the same thing stands true with the v150 on wall? Probably not as many lows going through the center channel - so maybe not as big an issue?

Re: M22 on wall vs. M22 free standing
pheare #332147 12/21/10 03:58 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 209
S
local
Offline
local
S
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 209
Audyssey set my Freestanding M22s with a 40hz Crossover, but I overrode that with a 60hz setting.

snazzed


M22, VP150, QS8 <--all v2
Sub: Outlaw LFM1-Plus
Denon AVR1910, Panasonic Plasma 50" S2
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,398
Posts432,331
Members15,419
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,437
SirQuack 13,690
CV 11,815
MarkSJohnson 11,451
Who's Online Now
1 members (Mojo), 233 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4