M50s instead of QS4
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6
regular
|
OP
regular
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6 |
My HT is still work in progress and i have the M60s and VP100.. Very happy with them.
Thinking of filling in the surrounds next and have been thinking about the M50s instead of QS4s. One of the reasons being that i will have to put the QS4s in a stand since mounting on the wall is not an option because of the shape of the room.
Looking for pros and cons of going ahead with the M50s.
|
|
|
Re: M50s instead of QS4
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420 |
There will be a timber mismatch using the M50's, not that it is critical for the surrounds but for multichannel music it is preffered to have a timber match on all speakers. I would suggest M22's or M60/M80 for direct radiators, but I would recommend the QS8's over the 4's for a perfect timber match and the QS8s over a direct radiator for surround duty.
The QS series is very forgiving on placement do you have a picture/drawing of your room, maybe we could suggest some places for the QS series to go.
Jason M80 v2 VP160 v3 QS8 v2 PB13 Ultra Denon 3808 Samsung 85" Q70
|
|
|
Re: M50s instead of QS4
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458 |
I wouldn't. I think it would be a bad idea, personally.
The QS-series diffuses the sound so it's not so localized and they have a reputation of being about as good as it gets.
Besides, the M50s are known to have a somewhat different sound than the M60s you have.
::::::: No disrespect to Axiom, but my favorite woofer is my yellow lab :::::::
|
|
|
Re: M50s instead of QS4
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,270
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,270 |
Hi krikan,
The QS8s are so placement forgiving that you can wall-mount them darn near anywhere and they'll still deliver a hugely enveloping surround field.
The do not need to be symmetrical in placement. By that, I mean they can be at different heights and distances, nor do they need to be opposite each other. My own QS8s are at different heights, and the right side surround is slightly forward of my couch and about 2 feet higher up than the left one. Their multi-directional dispersion simply blends together with all the reflections from a room's surfaces, yielding surround envelopment that is not localizable at the speakers.
Like the others here, I'd advise against using M50s because of the latter's different timbral (tonal) balance to your M60s.
Regards, Alan
Alan Lofft, Axiom Resident Expert (Retired)
|
|
|
Re: M50s instead of QS4
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044 |
Too far forward, and you don't get quite the effect, though.
I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
|
|
|
Re: M50s instead of QS4
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 10
frequent flier
|
frequent flier
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 10 |
I have a similar question. I have 4-way floor-standing pioneer speakers in the front with axiom's VP-180 center channel, and my next purchase is either QS8's or M80's. I was thinking I could move the pioneers to the rear and get the M80's first, or just go with QS8's because I already have front floor standing speakers.
Currently am using some Bose Series III bookshelf speakers for the rears sitting on a desk. Which leads to my second question, which the forum consensus seems that the QS8's sound better mounted on the wall rather than being on a speaker stand. Would that be correct?
Onkyo TX-NR801 Pioneer CS-J725 4-way fronts VP180v3 center Bose 301 Series 3 surround Sony subwoofer
|
|
|
Re: M50s instead of QS4
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,833
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,833 |
Get the M80s next and use the Bose for surround duty. I think you could use stands if ya want with good results.
Rick
"A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity." Sigmund Freud
|
|
|
Re: M50s instead of QS4
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466 |
I'm sure you can get good results with the stands, but they aren't as high as I'd like the surround speakers to be, and they cost extra money. If it's possible, I'd definitely wall-mount the QSes.
Pioneer PDP-5020FD, Marantz SR6011 Axiom M5HP, VP160HP, QS8 Sony PS4, surround backs -Chris
|
|
|
Re: M50s instead of QS4
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6
regular
|
OP
regular
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6 |
Thanks Alan.. The decision is pretty much done. Could u explain what you meant by timbral difference ? Would like to take this opportunity to understand what it is.. Thanks Jakewash.. The HT is in my basement which is 40' long and 25' wide, 7/7.5' high. It is a nice rectangle but the stairs leading down eats up 4' on one side. So i have a nice viewing/listening area of 25'x 25'. I thought because of the stairs on one side and wall on the other, the QS speakers wouldn't be at the same height and also facing different directions.. Alan's explanation helps and my problem now is to figure out how to run the wires and hide them in the walls
|
|
|
Re: M50s instead of QS4
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,877
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,877 |
I vote for wall mounting surrounds if at all possible.
-David
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,489
Members15,617
|
Most Online2,082 Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
0 members (),
997
guests, and
4
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|