QS8s, M22s or M2s for heights
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 578
aficionado
|
OP
aficionado
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 578 |
Well I finally ordered and received a Onkyo 3008 last week. With 9.2 a possiblity and height / wide options I ordered 2 more M22s in/on's for wides and 2 more QS8s for heights.
I currently have M22 in/on's for fronts, W150/W100 for center, QS8s for sides and QS8s for rears.
Currently the 3008 only does wides or fronts plus 7.2, but there is a rumored firmware update (reliable source) that the heights/wides can be used at the same time.
So for now I'm keeping the rear QS8s because you can quickly switch between heights or wides + 7'2 with a button on the remote for comparison.
Based on some of Grunt's posts a while back I went with QS8s for heights. Already ordered 1 1/2 weeks ago(but not shipped).
Now I'm second guessing myself because Audyssey recommends direct radiators for heights. So M22/M2 or QS8s for heights?
Any thoughts?
Thanks
Jeff
Last edited by wordgasm; 02/08/11 01:23 PM.
Fronts/Wides:M22s in/on Center:VP150/VP100 in/on Hghts,SS,SR:QS8s Sub:EP500 AVR:Onkyo 3008
|
|
|
Re: QS8s, M22s or M2s for heights
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,569
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,569 |
Now I'm second guessing myself because Audyssey recommends direct radiators for heights. So M22/M2 or QS8s for heights?
Hi Jeff, Audyssey recommends direct radiators for all positions so you had better second guess your surrounds and rears then also. This is because their EQ system is better at calculating a curve for a direct radiating speaker because it’s much simpler to model than the variety of di/bi pole configurations available. Recently another member, HuskerOmaha, got this response from Chris at Audyssey when he asked about using direct radiators or bipole speakers for heights: http://www.axiomaudio.com/boards/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=333226#Post333226Bottom line is that if you prefer QS8 style speakers for the surround and rear positions over direct radiators then I’m 99.9% sure you will also prefer them for height speakers since height speakers project only ambient and not direct sound effects. In other words buy the best speaker for the job and then apply EQ. Don’t buy an EQ system and then seek to match your speakers to it. Cheers, Dean
3M80 2M22 6QS8 2M2 1EP500 Sony BDP-S590 Panny-7000 Onkyo-3007 Carada-134 Xbox Buttkicker AS-EQ1
|
|
|
Re: QS8s, M22s or M2s for heights
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 578
aficionado
|
OP
aficionado
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 578 |
Now I'm second guessing myself because Audyssey recommends direct radiators for heights. So M22/M2 or QS8s for heights?
Hi Jeff, Audyssey recommends direct radiators for all positions so you had better second guess your surrounds and rears then also. This is because their EQ system is better at calculating a curve for a direct radiating speaker because it’s much simpler to model than the variety of di/bi pole configurations available. Recently another member, HuskerOmaha, got this response from Chris at Audyssey when he asked about using direct radiators or bipole speakers for heights: http://www.axiomaudio.com/boards/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=333226#Post333226Bottom line is that if you prefer QS8 style speakers for the surround and rear positions over direct radiators then I’m 99.9% sure you will also prefer them for height speakers since height speakers project only ambient and not direct sound effects. In other words buy the best speaker for the job and then apply EQ. Don’t buy an EQ system and then seek to match your speakers to it. Cheers, Dean Thanks I made the rright decision then. Just wanted to get "backup" I'm anxious to hear the heights and wides... from what I read you don't notice a big diff with the heights when you first hook them up... but then if you turn them off you can't live without them ("the wall of sound") Wides, I don't really have the proper room width for them but it should be some improvement... we shall see! hear! Thanks Jeff
Last edited by wordgasm; 02/08/11 02:54 PM.
Fronts/Wides:M22s in/on Center:VP150/VP100 in/on Hghts,SS,SR:QS8s Sub:EP500 AVR:Onkyo 3008
|
|
|
Re: QS8s, M22s or M2s for heights
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488 |
Congrats, Jeff. That's gonna be an even greater system. Would love to hear it some day.
bibere usque ad hilaritatem
|
|
|
Re: QS8s, M22s or M2s for heights
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 578
aficionado
|
OP
aficionado
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 578 |
Congrats, Jeff. That's gonna be an even greater system. Would love to hear it some day. Thanks TT! Spent the last months on the HTPC, servers and extenders. Build a new Sandy Bridge 2600K 12gb SSD HTPC, moved all the media to the HTPC off the server (i know, long story), so now I have a HTPC with 21TB of movie storage, 4TB Recorded TV storage, 3TB of recorded tv movies storage and 1TB for music and photos. "I know ... who could listen/watch all that! It's the journey not the destination" So with that behind me ... it's time to concentrate on audio expansion, audio calibration, then video calibration. Then maybe some movie watchin' & music listenin' Then I'll get to the real work, remodel the media room and finish the AV rack. My little 3 month HTPC/AV rack project has turned into a 2 year monster... that I've (for the most part) totally enjoyed. Your welcome to a listen anytime your in Western NC (and give me time to tidy up the project(s) messes! Thanks again Jeff
Last edited by wordgasm; 02/08/11 06:41 PM.
Fronts/Wides:M22s in/on Center:VP150/VP100 in/on Hghts,SS,SR:QS8s Sub:EP500 AVR:Onkyo 3008
|
|
|
Re: QS8s, M22s or M2s for heights
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488 |
bibere usque ad hilaritatem
|
|
|
Re: QS8s, M22s or M2s for heights
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466 |
How many drives do you have on the Sandy Bridge machine? Do you know about the disk corruption that's occurring with the 3 Gb SATA interfaces? Only the first two, 6 Gb SATA ports can be used without data loss being likely.
Edit: More specifically, boards featuring Intel's P67 and H67 chipsets.
Last edited by ClubNeon; 02/08/11 06:55 PM.
Pioneer PDP-5020FD, Marantz SR6011 Axiom M5HP, VP160HP, QS8 Sony PS4, surround backs -Chris
|
|
|
Re: QS8s, M22s or M2s for heights
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044 |
That's all Sandy Bridges at this point. There ain't no other chipsets...
I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
|
|
|
Re: QS8s, M22s or M2s for heights
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466 |
Intel is once again allowing machines to be released with the defective chips, but only two SATA ports enabled.
Pioneer PDP-5020FD, Marantz SR6011 Axiom M5HP, VP160HP, QS8 Sony PS4, surround backs -Chris
|
|
|
Re: QS8s, M22s or M2s for heights
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,569
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,569 |
Intel is once again allowing machines to be released with the defective chips, but only two SATA ports enabled. Thanks that’s good to know.
3M80 2M22 6QS8 2M2 1EP500 Sony BDP-S590 Panny-7000 Onkyo-3007 Carada-134 Xbox Buttkicker AS-EQ1
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,480
Members15,617
|
Most Online2,082 Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
0 members (),
993
guests, and
2
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|