Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4
Re: stereo vs surround
Mathew #344581 04/08/11 11:54 AM
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015
Your compute could live on/in a small desk somewhere, perhaps, or get a laptop or Ipad instead.

None of the Axiom subs will oversupply bass. They only fill in the lower portions without overdoing it. The more expensive ones will just do it lower and more linear (flatter) for more accurate reproduction, before your room changes everything (lol). Consider the EP350 as the smallest one you would use from the Axiom line. I know first hand, because I started with the EP175.

Re: stereo vs surround
Mathew #344582 04/08/11 11:55 AM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458
Mathew, I would definitely go for at least the 350, and maybe lean towards the 500 if you enjoy action/sci-fi movies.

Frankly, the 175 doesn't get an awful lot of love in that it simply doesn't put out anywhere near the other two subs!

Edit: And another welcome, by the way! smile

Last edited by MarkSJohnson; 04/08/11 11:56 AM.

::::::: No disrespect to Axiom, but my favorite woofer is my yellow lab :::::::
Re: stereo vs surround
Mathew #344583 04/08/11 12:22 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,422
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,422
Originally Posted By: Mathew
Thank you all for the information and suggestions. I would love to add a room to the back of the house where the patio is to house my home theater. But realistically I can't afford to buy the system, buy a receiver for $500-$1000 and then add a $10,000-$20,000 addition on the back of the house (LMAO).



Yeah, sorry. I shouldn't have made such a sarcastic recommendation to someone new here. I was purely joking about the house addition.


Farewell - June 4, 2020
Re: stereo vs surround
nickbuol #344584 04/08/11 12:51 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458
But, really.... it WOULD make us forum members happier if you built the addition. grin


::::::: No disrespect to Axiom, but my favorite woofer is my yellow lab :::::::
Re: stereo vs surround
MarkSJohnson #344590 04/08/11 01:53 PM
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 9
Mathew Offline OP
regular
OP Offline
regular
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 9
Hey nickbuol, No offense taken. I laughed at what you posted. My answer was sarcastic also. But now that we are on the subject maybe you could lend me the money (LMAO).

Re: stereo vs surround
Mathew #344603 04/08/11 04:50 PM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 311
devotee
Offline
devotee
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 311
That room is pretty hopeless for decent surround HT in it's current configuration.

Best you can do would be to get the M3's and wall mount them. At least you would have a decent 2 channel music system.

Or get a new wife? wink

The M22's are the greatest bang for the buck product that Axiom makes imo. If you could rearrange the room properly, I would recommend them and a sub and surrounds. But with that out of the question your options are very limited.

I see that the will is there, but do you have the yarbles to make a stand?

In my home, I find the best place for speaker placement first and then I arrange the furniture around that!

But good audio is a priority in my house. A quality of living "issue".

Luckily, my lady shares my dogmatic approach to music and movies!

You could look into the Gallo "lifestyle" product line. Great sounding and unobtrusive, but it might be too odd or weird for those with conventional tastes.


"Art is making something out of nothing and selling it."
---Frank Zappa

Re: stereo vs surround
audiosavant #344648 04/08/11 10:57 PM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 185
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 185
Matthew, you have gotten some good advice considering your room limitations. Here are my two cents worth.

1. Get the M22s for fronts and set them on either side of the TV. Set the TV forward if necessary for them to fit on the sides. M22s are more than adequate to drive music to insane levels in your space and they are very accurate above 80 Hz.
2. Get a receiver that will let you set a phantom center. I think most will. In your room you won't notice any difference from a real center unless you need to set the center higher for dialog reasons.
3. Get QS8s or M2s for rears and mount (set) one above the bookshelf a foot away from the fireplace and wall mount the other high between the outside door and the large window.
4. Get a good sub for music below 80 Hz. Look outside Axiom for best value in the US. Be careful on size since you will have placement issues.
Bill

Re: stereo vs surround
wilwom #344653 04/09/11 12:29 AM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 427
devotee
Offline
devotee
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 427
Seems to be you could quite easily get rid of the computer closet. On either side of the fireplace it looks like you have some type of cabinet holding a bunch of books. All it would mean is getting a different type of cabinet that could handle a computer as well. I've seen plenty enough of those around. Such as this, http://www.ikea.com/ca/en/catalog/products/40180061

If you do that you could then centre the tv on the wall and move the couch to the opposite end maybe 10ft away with a chair against the wall.

I think it would work prety well!

Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,479
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 920 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4