Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 3 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Re: Sounded like Neal had a great idea until...
Murph #383550 10/02/12 01:02 AM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 172
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 172
This has been interesting. We looked at bit depth, what about sampling rate?

BTW, I pick 3 and 5.


For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert.
Re: Sounded like Neal had a great idea until...
ClubNeon #383553 10/02/12 02:04 AM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
If I cut out a 20 second chunk from each track, starting from about 1:25, using Audacity, would it negatively affect the samples at all? I want to be able to easily play the same chunk of music from each track quickly back and forth.

Re: Sounded like Neal had a great idea until...
pmbuko #383554 10/02/12 02:13 AM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
I have another idea. Could you randomly -- and by randomly, I mean assign digits 1 through n to the different versions of the track -- string together 15-second cuts of different tracks so that you're left with a seamless track that smoothly transitions between bit-rates?

The overall goal would be for the listener to identify which 15 second spans are encoded with the highest quality, starting at time index 0:00, 0:15, 0:30, etc. Since you'd assign the parts randomly, you may end up with a few consecutive spans of the same quality. With the chunks only being 15 seconds long, you'd also increase your chances of using all the bit-rates before the end of the track.

Re: Sounded like Neal had a great idea until...
ClubNeon #383555 10/02/12 02:25 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
Very good, Chris. Although my previous personal experience and study of other test results didn't leave much doubt that both 320 kbps CBR or the "extreme"VBR(around mid 200s kbps)would be audibly transparent(even with about 80% of the audio data discarded), I listened on both speakers and headphones.

I paid special attention to the first 12 seconds before the singing attempt began, particularly the 9th though 12th notes, which have the sort of content which might demonstrate a difference. After several trials on each of the four samples, nothing was heard would support anything beyond a pure guess.

This might be surprising to some who claim to be able to hear a difference even between pieces of connecting wire, but it's the reality of modern audio technology.


-----------------------------------

Enjoy the music, not the equipment.


Re: Sounded like Neal had a great idea until...
Boltron #383556 10/02/12 03:10 AM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466
Originally Posted By: Boltron
This has been interesting. We looked at bit depth, what about sampling rate?

I can try something with sampling rate. But while I'm sure of 0-filling LSBs, in order to make the files the same size. I'd have to take a higher sampling rate, and downsample it, and then upsample it again, and that may not be as clear cut.

I'll play around, and see if there are any extremely obvious tell-tale signs that would make the test inaccurate.


Pioneer PDP-5020FD, Marantz SR6011
Axiom M5HP, VP160HP, QS8
Sony PS4, surround backs
-Chris
Re: Sounded like Neal had a great idea until...
pmbuko #383558 10/02/12 03:16 AM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466
Originally Posted By: pmbuko
If I cut out a 20 second chunk from each track, starting from about 1:25, using Audacity, would it negatively affect the samples at all? I want to be able to easily play the same chunk of music from each track quickly back and forth.

No, nothing wrong with doing that. Of course it's also possible to use Audacity to cheat, but you won't do that, right? smile

As for identifying 15 second segments of one track. I can do that. In fact I was flipping between bit-depths as I was preparing the test. I could identify 8 and 12-bit, but 16-, 20-, and 24-bit all sounded the same to me. I'm just not that sure of how good a test it would be. It's hard to say, "this is 16-bit," without having something to compare against.


Pioneer PDP-5020FD, Marantz SR6011
Axiom M5HP, VP160HP, QS8
Sony PS4, surround backs
-Chris
Re: Sounded like Neal had a great idea until...
JohnK #383559 10/02/12 03:23 AM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466
Originally Posted By: JohnK
I paid special attention to the first 12 seconds before the singing attempt began, particularly the 9th though 12th notes, which have the sort of content which might demonstrate a difference. After several trials on each of the four samples, nothing was heard would support anything beyond a pure guess.

Yeah. smile And as I've said, that first test was really absolutely worse case, and I couldn't tell the difference.

Did you check out the second set of tracks? (You might like the music too.) I'm glad that I had the option for 8- and 12-bit output, or I would have never believed that the dithering software I was using was even doing anything (actually, I can see it doing something on the VU meter at the higher depths, but I can't hear it).


Pioneer PDP-5020FD, Marantz SR6011
Axiom M5HP, VP160HP, QS8
Sony PS4, surround backs
-Chris
Re: Sounded like Neal had a great idea until...
Murph #383560 10/02/12 04:10 AM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466
Oh, and a fun fact. I was going to use a track from R.E.M. for this second test, but as I was processing it, my digital clip indicator came on. This is why we can't have nice things, the engineer was given 24-bits and he still slammed it into a brick wall. (Although it's no were near as bad as The Flaming Lips', At War with the Mystics.)


Pioneer PDP-5020FD, Marantz SR6011
Axiom M5HP, VP160HP, QS8
Sony PS4, surround backs
-Chris
Re: Sounded like Neal had a great idea until...
ClubNeon #383562 10/02/12 06:46 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
Okay, I listened to the Carmina Burana samples(Thielemann?). Quite dynamic, but nothing that can't be handled easily with 16 bits. The dynamic range on all was about 50dB, from the upper 50s to a max of 106dB on my SPL meter, and sounded identical.


-----------------------------------

Enjoy the music, not the equipment.


Re: Sounded like Neal had a great idea until...
Murph #383569 10/02/12 01:53 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,466
The dithering raised the noise floor up to -80 dB, but that's still well below the audible threshold.

And yeah, it was Thielemann. I actually quite like that disc.


Pioneer PDP-5020FD, Marantz SR6011
Axiom M5HP, VP160HP, QS8
Sony PS4, surround backs
-Chris
Page 3 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,939
Posts442,452
Members15,615
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 233 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4