What would be a good video camera choice for...
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,236
connoisseur
|
OP
connoisseur
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,236 |
capturing youth basketball games, hand held, and will play nice with the new iMacs coming out in December. The intention is to capture the games and make them available online for other parents.
Price range... probably maxed out at $700.
I know DSLRs can make pretty good movies but I think a video camera will be a better choice to capture a basketball game in its entirety.
Thanks!!
M3 and M80
|
|
|
Re: What would be a good video camera choice for...
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420 |
To be honest I don't think there is much difference between a good camera or a strictly video camera and for $700 you are getting a pretty good DSLR.
Jason M80 v2 VP160 v3 QS8 v2 PB13 Ultra Denon 3808 Samsung 85" Q70
|
|
|
Re: What would be a good video camera choice for...
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,236
connoisseur
|
OP
connoisseur
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,236 |
DSLRs have great looking video. But, and I don't know this for a fact, I think they would not handle this application well. When a production company uses a DSLR they are doing takes and the camera gets to rest in-between. I think the game might be too long. Autofocus is another issue. Pro movie makers buy the special cinematography lenses that facilitate manual focus pulling.
M3 and M80
|
|
|
Re: What would be a good video camera choice for...
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654 |
Chris, I don't have any personal experience with these and the most recent Consumer Reports tests were in the December 2010 issue. For a HD recorder in your price range they recommended the JVC GZ-HM550.
-----------------------------------
Enjoy the music, not the equipment.
|
|
|
Re: What would be a good video camera choice for...
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,236
connoisseur
|
OP
connoisseur
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,236 |
Thanks John. I don't have any personal experience either. I found a Canon that was on Apples compatibility list. The price is right and people seem to like it. I will check this one out next, or at least it's most recent iteration.
M3 and M80
|
|
|
Re: What would be a good video camera choice for...
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458 |
Chris- Sorry I hadn't seen the thread earlier.
I have absolutely no experience with consumer video cameras (I've never even owned one), but I would strongly recommend a video camera for what you're doing.
Yes, a DSLR is more versatile in that it's a still camera as well.
But a camcorder will offer auto focusing, a much better and longer zoom range, no limits as to the record time, and much, much better ergonomics for handholding and monitor screen.
If you were just looking to dabble in photography and video, I'd probably recommend the DSLR. But if your primary focus (!) right now is those basketball games, a camcorder is a much better choice.
I don't even know if you can buy a consumer camcorder that records on tape or disc or HD any more, but I would only be looking for one that records to SS chips...i.e., SDHC or such.
::::::: No disrespect to Axiom, but my favorite woofer is my yellow lab :::::::
|
|
|
Re: What would be a good video camera choice for...
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,444 Likes: 16
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,444 Likes: 16 |
I just can't get over having video in a DSLR. That's like putting pees in my tuna fish. It just doesn't work for me.
|
|
|
Re: What would be a good video camera choice for...
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,291
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,291 |
DSLR video must not be bad; in the movie Blackswan they used a Canon DSLR for many scenes.
|
|
|
Re: What would be a good video camera choice for...
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458 |
No, the image quality is outstanding. But focusing is difficult at best, and the ergonomics of handholding is really bad.
There are many third party companies that make an array of devices to overcome these issues, but none of them are practical nor priced for consumers.
Shooting sports is pretty much the most demanding task you can ask of a videographer. It's fast moving and unpredictable. Handicapping yourself with a camera that's difficult to focus and hold just doesn't make sense.
::::::: No disrespect to Axiom, but my favorite woofer is my yellow lab :::::::
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,964
Posts442,603
Members15,631
|
Most Online2,699 Aug 8th, 2024
|
|
0 members (),
1,030
guests, and
3
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|