Re: FM: No static at all...(NOT!)
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 129
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 129 |
If you live in an apartment, you may be SOL. If you live in a house, however...you have got it made! For about $20, radio shack has a great FM only directional antenna. Although meant to be mast mounted outdoors, mine does a fine job picking up radio stations about 120 miles away while attic mounted. Set it up in your attic, point it in the correct direction, and hook it up with the best low loss 75ohm coax you can afford (look on the Belden website for inexpensive coax...do NOT get the crap Radio Shack generally sells). The antenna is great, but their coax sucks!
"Life, liberty, and the persuit of happiness"...Go Packers! and Go Badgers!
|
|
|
Re: FM: No static at all...(NOT!)
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,488
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,488 |
those powered antennas are less than medeocre. You boost the signal, ALONG with the noise!
If your willing to shell out the cash, for 100 bucks you can get the Magnum Dynalab ST2 antnenna. Its supposed to be pretty good. I have been wanting to get one for my Sansui 517 tuner for a while but i just cant break down and spend 100 bucks on an antenna.
I use the T wire one now but it doesnt pull in anything from the other islands, when i know radio's in some peoples truck will. etc.
http://www.audioadvisor.com/store/productdetail.asp?sku=MAGST2
|
|
|
Re: FM: No static at all...(NOT!)
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654 |
All you ever wanted to know about FM antennas .
-----------------------------------
Enjoy the music, not the equipment.
|
|
|
Re: FM: No static at all...(NOT!)
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 13
frequent flier
|
frequent flier
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 13 |
THIS is TOO hilarious for words!! Are you the author? This is funnier than most tv shows I've seen lately; which is why I still only have an ocilloscope tube-based video receiving device.
|
|
|
Re: FM: No static at all...(NOT!)
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2
newbie
|
newbie
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2 |
Another suggestion...is your power filtered?
I picked up a nice Belkin PureAV Isolator a few months ago and it seriously cleaned up my reception. FM went from barely listenable to crystal clear and I can actually listen to AM again.
It's F9A1033-12 on belkin.com, the link isn't working.
Last edited by figaro; 03/30/04 02:12 PM.
|
|
|
Re: FM: No static at all...(NOT!)
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,270
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,270 |
Hi shrubber,
The powered Terks and the like are really just variations on the T-shaped dipole wire that you already tried. I've used the Magnum Dynalab vertical 1/4-wave whip antenna and it worked quite well in a dense urban setting if you placed it near a window.
Even better is the Tivoli Audio PAL FM/AM portable that I reviewed for Sound&Vision magazine a year or so ago. It's also designed by the late Henry Kloss and I found it a bit more sensitive than the Kloss Model One. And you can swing around its telescoping antenna to "tune" in weak FM signals (and suppress interference) which is a distinct advantage over the Kloss Model 1.
The PAL also has an excellent AM tuner. Overall, I received more listenable reception to FM and AM with the PAL than using the Magnum Dynalab and the tuner in my receiver. Most of the internal FM tuner chips in receivers are mediocre at best and the AM sections are awful.
The little PAL is compact, so you can carry it around the house to listen to NPR, and I like its tone quality better than the Kloss Model One. Its internal rechargable battery lasts about 3 or 4 days and recharges in a few hours (you can still use the radio on the AC adapter while its charging).
Regards,
Alan Lofft, Axiom Resident Expert (Retired)
|
|
|
Re: FM: No static at all...(NOT!)
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 24
hobbyist
|
OP
hobbyist
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 24 |
Thanks all for your great ideas, commiseration, and visual sarcasm (yeah, I'm lookin' at you spiff!)
BrenR: AFAIK, my local cable doesn't include FM, but I'll hook it up just to make sure. Could be I've had it all along and didn't even know. (The receiver is the first tuner, other than clock radios and portables, that I've had since, well, ever.)
Alan: Much as I like the idea of the Tivolis—and love the old-school analog look—there's no way the exchequer is going to sign off. "Didn't that new receiver thingy—whatever you just spent $660 on—come with a radio tuner...?!"
Fortunately, we live in a house so I think I'll check into attic antenna options first, including some of the ideas from JohnK's link. Very info-taining, BTW.
I'll let y'all know what I come up with.
|
|
|
Re: FM: No static at all...(NOT!)
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,854
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,854 |
You might also contact tinfoilhat and see if he has a spare chapeau. Tie that into a bit of Bluetooth technology and you might be able to act as your own antenna. You understand, of course, that this is highly theoretical.
|
|
|
Re: FM: No static at all...(NOT!)
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 206
local
|
local
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 206 |
It is not as easy as that. Your fillings also have to be calibrated..
|
|
|
Re: FM: No static at all...(NOT!)
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,854
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,854 |
What is the normal break in period for the hat?
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,984
Posts442,691
Members15,643
|
Most Online2,699 Aug 8th, 2024
|
|
0 members (),
595
guests, and
0
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|