Re: And the circle continues...
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441 |
"folks who think they're scientists" ...
What is it with your disdain of scientists?
You are 100% correct that the article chesseroo linked was not science. It was one guy's rant on his findings about the audio marketplace BASED ON the complete disconnect of marketing from actual scientific evidence. You are perfectly within your right not to give a rats a$$ (happy tomtuttle? ) about that scientific research, but it doesn't make the linked rant's conclusions any less true.
|
|
|
Re: And the circle continues...
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,760 Likes: 40
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,760 Likes: 40 |
KC, I certainly did not mean to insult you, only to disagree with you. We're talking about sound equipment here, and a bit of philosophy of science, not religion. Peace.
Enjoy the Music. Trust your ears. Laugh at Folks Who Claim to Know it All.
|
|
|
Re: And the circle continues...
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 625
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 625 |
B.J., if i may call you that, correct me if i'm wrong, but you don't even have axioms yet?? if i'm correct, what will you be once you have taken possession (sp)?
dan
|
|
|
Re: And the circle continues...
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,745 Likes: 17
axiomite
|
OP
axiomite
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,745 Likes: 17 |
In reply to:
I see, like the stickleback fish, when confronted with argument, folks who think they're scientists talk about food.
Well, i AM a scientist. Based on what i just read, and I really don't know much about your background of course or even if you are referring to the threespine stickleback ( Gasterosteus aculeatus) or the ninespine stickleback ( Pungitius pungitus (Linnaeus)) but here's a clue from Grade 2 science class, FISH CANNOT TALK.
I guess that is just my OPINION.
"Those who preach the myths of audio are ignorant of truth."
|
|
|
Re: And the circle continues...
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 106
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 106 |
he'll be one happy MoFo
^billy
videoslave
|
|
|
Re: And the circle continues...
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,016
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,016 |
wow, this has gone from bad to worse..
2dan- when i said i was an addict, i was referring to my posts(over 300).. just one of those stupid goals i was going for while bored at work today. to be honest, once i get my AXIOMS home and set up my HT, i hopefully can be called a 'believer'.. i am buying these speakers sight unseen, and sound unheard. rest assured, there is a certain amount of uncertanity in my mind.. i hope that floats away with the sounds coming out of my new speakers.
bigjohn
EXCUSE ME, ARE YOU THE SINGING BUSH??
|
|
|
Re: And the circle continues...
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,951
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,951 |
2x6, I've met you and know you to be a more than decent fellow, but I think it is a lost cause to try and convince the "science club" that they should fork out huge bucks for dubious products. I, for one, will keep my money in my pocket.
|
|
|
Re: And the circle continues...
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,760 Likes: 40
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,760 Likes: 40 |
Hi BigWill, I had the great pleasure of your hospitality, but I am a committed believer in quality on-the-cheap. I paid about $70 for my Mapleshade Clearview speaker cables - came with a problem, they were nice enough to upgrade me to a pair of Mapleshade Clearview Double Golden Helix Plus speaker wires. I love 'em. Someday, you'll come by my place and let me demo some cool stuff for you. There are some amps I like very much - I have a Yamaha M-80, and a Kenwood KA9100. Paid a total of a bit over $100 for the two of them and they are in mint condition. I am also proud of my big Onk - an Onkyo M504. I did go a bit crazy and paid $300 for that one. One of my favorite amplifier scores however is the Onkyo M282 a 120 watt x 2 amp with a very rich sound quality. They list for about $300 each, but you can grab them off ubid.com for under $100 every now and again.
I also love my Axiom and Michaura speakers - they outperform speakers which cost my friends many, many times the price of my Canadian beauties.
I think the idea here is quality at a price. Anyone can throw megabucks at the problem of sound reproduction and come away with a pretty nice system. The challenge is, putting together a system which sounds as good and costs WAY less.
My favorite great system on-the-cheap is my garage system - a mint Kenwood KA9100 solid state amp (cost me $20, the seller and I thought it was broken, turned out it was just the jumpers), a pair of Dahlquist DQM-905s ($50) and a ($10 garage sale item) JVC XL504 6 disc changer (sounds substantially better than a Cambridge D500SE I bought and then sold).
I picked up a 2 channel Kenwood THX amp rated at 200 wpc, thought I would love it - hated it. The KA9100 sounds better, so does the big Onk, I've had other amps whose sound I did not like. I bought them thinking I would. Placebo effect? It's all in the sounds boys and girls, not the price, and they don't all sound the same.
Enjoy the Music. Trust your ears. Laugh at Folks Who Claim to Know it All.
|
|
|
Re: And the circle continues...
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 170
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 170 |
PMB,
Thanks for the reply.
I'm not a 'science doubter' in any sense of the word- and I agree with you about double-blind tests and was very pro-double-blind tests in my post.
My issue, and I'd guess that you're sympathetic to this, is with people who extrapolate a little too far from scientific results and/or who call on science "as a drunk uses a lightpost- for support, not illumination". In professional scientific journals, published results of experiments always seem very tentative and limited in scope- I'd say proper science is usually rather tentative.
This guy (and I enjoyed the read, kcarlile- thanks) struck me as not tentative, step-by-step, objective, citing other literature, and 'scientific', but informal and informative. There's definitely a need for information like this, but the article was definitely not 'scientific' though he tries to come off as a scientist.
He does make a lot of good points, but he doesn't come off as what he says he is. He's saying "I'm a scientist" to back up his claims, yet not being scientific, and that's a little bothersome.
So, I really enjoyed the read, and I think he's right on more points than not. But it's only a collection of assertions, not proof of something.
Good night guys,
Mike
|
|
|
Re: And the circle continues...
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,602
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,602 |
In reply to:
the "science club"
I think that's a misleading label... it's not science versus voodoo, there are basic fundamentals of electricity, physics and engineering at work here. We're not talking about guys in lab coats stuck far away from the real world, we're talking about technicians - guys who do this day-in, day-out for 20+ years.
You're comparing a holistic healer to a biomed student when you should be comparing the shaman to an ER attending physician. It's all about the ratio of theory to practice and how that compares to blind faith and sensory perception.
Bren R.
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,984
Posts442,691
Members15,643
|
Most Online2,699 Aug 8th, 2024
|
|
0 members (),
595
guests, and
0
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|