hertz, bits, and bitrates - demistifying the devil
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,351
connoisseur
|
OP
connoisseur
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,351 |
can anyone here point me to a link, or explain in plain english, what each of these really means in audio terms?
I know hertz is the sampling rate. 96kHz means every second there are 96,000 samples of the sine wave. but what about bits?
and bitrate? I know in computer terms bitrate is the # of bits streamed per second, but what is its relationship in audio and its relationship with bits and hertz?
I also know 24 bit will give you better sound than 16 bit, but why exactly? what exactly is 24bit? is it that each sample, all 96,000 of them are stored in 24 bit rather than 16, giving it even more definition?
if so, is bitrate an equation of hertz and bits?
thanks for all your replies!
|
|
|
Re: hertz, bits, and bitrates - demistifying the devil
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,331
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,331 |
Ravi,
I don't think you've got "Hertz" quite right. These may help.
Hertz
Bit
Bit Rate
Jack
"People generally quarrel because they cannot argue." - G. K. Chesterton
|
|
|
Re: hertz, bits, and bitrates - demistifying the d
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441 |
Yeah, what Ajax said.
Hertz applies to the analog waveform of the sound and is independent of sampling.
|
|
|
Re: hertz, bits, and bitrates - demistifying the d
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,460 Likes: 6
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,460 Likes: 6 |
Actually, the "sampling rate" is measured in hertz - as the sampling rate used for compact discs is 44.1 kHz (44,100 cycles per second or, samples per second). The sampling rate must be at least twice the maximum frequency to be reproduced.
So for a CD to reproduce audio up to 20 kHz theorectically requires a sampling rate of 40 kHz The actual standard is set at 44.1 kHz.
You are correct regarding sound. But it also applies beyond sound, into other areas of physics.
|
|
|
Re: hertz, bits, and bitrates - demistifying the d
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,351
connoisseur
|
OP
connoisseur
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,351 |
thanks everyone, that makes much more sense.
this does apply to my job as well, in a sense, as the company i work for sells digital systems to monitor brain waves. thus, i hear about bits and sampling frequency all the time.
|
|
|
Prettty handy
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 156
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 156 |
thanks for the links
very helpful and pretty simple to grasp
"There is one thing that I know for sure, and that is that I know nothing." ...Socrates
|
|
|
Re: hertz, bits, and bitrates - demistifying the d
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,331
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,331 |
I was not aware that "sampling rate" was measured in Hertz. Do you think the fact that I don't even know what "sampling rate" is could have anything do do with that? DUH! Thanks, BBIBH.
I'm so old that, when I first started learning about audio, there was no such thing as Hertz or Hertzian waves. Back in the dark ages they were called "cycles" or "cps" (cycles per second).
Jack
"People generally quarrel because they cannot argue." - G. K. Chesterton
|
|
|
Re: hertz, bits, and bitrates - demistifying the d
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,460 Likes: 6
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,460 Likes: 6 |
Well, I guess the important thing is that we are all open to learning!
I myself have spent many years in audio, and at one point was the boards "audiophile snob", and I am only just learning home theatre!
|
|
|
Re: hertz, bits, and bitrates - demistifying the devil
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654 |
Just to add a bit(sorry)more, Ravi, the bit rate is essentially a combination of bits and sampling rate. On CDs the sampling of the frequencies takes place at 44,100 times a second, and as BigBear pointed out, this allows frequencies up to half of that(i.e. 22.05KHz) to be sampled perfectly(it's called the Nyquist theorem). The 16 bits (BInary digiTS) long "words" composed of 1s and 0s can allow for 65,536 different volume levels(2 to the 16th power)for each frequency sampled. So, the sampling measures the frequency and the particular combination of bits needed to represent the volume that frequency had in the original performance taken together result in an exact reproduction of what was originally recorded.
No, 24 bit doesn't necessarily give audibly better sound than 16 bit. Yes, each sample is composed of 24 rather than 16 bits and allows for over 16 million(2 to the 24th power)different sound levels. 16 bits allows for a dynamic range of about 98dB(6.02n + 1.76)while 24 bits would allow about 146dB in theory. However, this actually can't be used and recordings don't have at most more than about a 90dB dynamic range(e.g. the 30dB noise level of a very quiet room up to a 120dB maximum level at orchestral peaks). The quality of sound depends on the original recording technique and the mixing and mastering then applied, rather than whether it winds up on a CD, DVD-A or SACD.
-----------------------------------
Enjoy the music, not the equipment.
|
|
|
Re: hertz, bits, and bitrates - demistifying the devil
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,351
connoisseur
|
OP
connoisseur
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,351 |
JohnK, excellent post once again.
This really brings up the question as to whether 129khz recordings sound any better. I have found, however, that DVD's at 96/24 sound better than CD's at 44/16, but that may jsut be because the master recordings were better.
Patricia Barber's Modern Cool CD is only in 44/16 but its master tapes were 24bit, i assume.
So maybe one day there will be a digital format offering 256/32 but no one will hear the difference
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,489
Members15,617
|
Most Online2,082 Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
0 members (),
1,046
guests, and
1
robot. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|