|
|
 Which type sub is easier to place?
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,805
connoisseur
|
OP
connoisseur
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,805 |
I'm still trying to nail down which sub to get. I'm leaning towards the SVS
PCI 20-39, but was wondering which type sub is easier or more forgiving in placement, (I'm limited) front fireing, down fireing, or cylinder type.?
Is the SVS considered a "musical" sub. I play about 95% music and 5% movies. (but would still like some shaking going on during movies)
LIFE IS SHORT.
DON'T BE A DICK.
|
|
|
Re: Which type sub is easier to place?
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,745 Likes: 17
axiomite
|
|
axiomite
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,745 Likes: 17 |
bray,
You can read my thoughts here
"Those who preach the myths of audio are ignorant of truth."
|
|
|
Re: Which type sub is easier to place?
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,236
axiomite
|
|
axiomite
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,236 |
At 95% music, I'd seriously look into a Hsu STF-3.
|
|
|
Re: Which type sub is easier to place?
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 206
local
|
|
local
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 206 |
I'm on the same boat, for solely music you might want to take a look at the Onix Rocket UFW-10, from what I read this is a very fast and accurate sub that excel mostly in music, it's still fine for movie and can pump all the way down to about 25hz before it roll off, it's going for $599 and the woodwork appears to be outstanding, the footprint is smaller than HSU and SVS as well. Ask Craigsub about this onix, he was doing some serious review along with the SVS and other subs in this price range. I'm still trying to decide between the Onix and SVS.
|
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,484
Members15,617
| |
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
|
0 members (),
457
guests, and
4
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|
|
