Sound Meter of Choice
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,424
connoisseur
|
OP
connoisseur
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,424 |
Just curious on what everyone is running as I need a new one! Any feedback is much appreciated. Should I get one that is analog or digital?
|
|
|
Re: Sound Meter of Choice
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 147
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 147 |
Get the Analog! I have both and ths analog is much more sensitive for accurate results.
Axiom M80Ti(4)
Axiom VP150(1)
Axiom Qs8(4)
Axiom M22ti(2)
Axiom M3ti(2)
|
|
|
Re: Sound Meter of Choice
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,424
connoisseur
|
OP
connoisseur
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,424 |
What brand do you have? ie: Radio Shack or something else?
|
|
|
Re: Sound Meter of Choice
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,863
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,863 |
radio shack dosnt carry the analog anymore, you might be able to find a store that still has one, for cheep, i got mine for 15$ because they were trying to get rid of it...
|
|
|
Re: Sound Meter of Choice
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 346
devotee
|
devotee
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 346 |
You can actually find the Radio Shack Analog SPL meter off of SVS's website. It's priced at $44 plus S&H. http://www.svsubwoofers.com/parts.htm
"We're on the island of Misfit Toys"
|
|
|
Re: Sound Meter of Choice
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,201
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,201 |
I have the newer analog version of the radio shack meter. Picked one up about four months ago. I think the old version was phased out. Call your local rat shack to see if they have any in stock. Otherwise order one from svs.
Good luck.
*Michael* AV123 Refugee - X-LS Encore, X-Voce, X-Omnis, Elt-Dpa's Denon AVR-591 Magnavox NB500MGX BDP
|
|
|
Re: Sound Meter of Choice
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379 Likes: 7
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379 Likes: 7 |
They are still selling the analog meter up in Canada, and it's still in the catalog. It's 69.99 CDN up here (more like 50 US than 40 US) but seems to work well and have a decent meter movement.
M60ti, VP180, QS8, M2ti, EP500, PC-Plus 20-39 M5HP, M40ti, Sierra-1 LFR1100 active, ADA1500-4 and -8
|
|
|
Re: Sound Meter of Choice
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 147
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 147 |
Neverhappy,
I got mine at RadioShack.. If you check out radioshack.com they have them for $39.99
Axiom M80Ti(4)
Axiom VP150(1)
Axiom Qs8(4)
Axiom M22ti(2)
Axiom M3ti(2)
|
|
|
Re: Sound Meter of Choice
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 649
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 649 |
I have both Radio Shack models - the digital and analog. I don't know about the accuracy, but I find the analog meter just marginally easier to use. If you're interested in the digital meter (used only once), PM me and make me an offer.
M22ti mains, EP175 sub, VP150 center, QS4 surrounds
|
|
|
Re: Sound Meter of Choice
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 715
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 715 |
I have the digital one from Radio Shack. I would have prefered the analog, but not enough to search to hard for it or wait too long. None of the radio shacks in my city had the analog so I went digital. It works fine.
jr
"What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence." C Hitchens
|
|
|
Re: Sound Meter of Choice
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,703
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,703 |
sorta on topic....
How does everyone use their meter to tune the sub?
|
|
|
Re: Sound Meter of Choice
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 649
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 649 |
Well, maybe I'm doing this all wrong, but I use the same 75hz signal for the sub that I use for the rest of the speakers. I get the control knob on the EP175 more or less in the ballpark, then make smaller adjustments with the sub's level control on the receiver. I think right now I'm +3db on the receiver's sub output. Everyone one of the speakers is +-3b of 0.
M22ti mains, EP175 sub, VP150 center, QS4 surrounds
|
|
|
Re: Sound Meter of Choice
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 289
local
|
local
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 289 |
Radio Shack does have a new Analog version available.
At least in Canada.
I picked one up from them ( in the Vancouver Area ) just recently. Don't know why but most posts I've read say the Analog version is preferable.
Cheers, jag.
|
|
|
Re: Sound Meter of Choice
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379 Likes: 7
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379 Likes: 7 |
>>Don't know why but most posts I've read say the Analog version is preferable.
I just find that if the level is jumping around between 94db and 95db the analog meter shows "jumping around between 94 and 95" while the digital meter shows "jumping around a lot and impossible to read"
M60ti, VP180, QS8, M2ti, EP500, PC-Plus 20-39 M5HP, M40ti, Sierra-1 LFR1100 active, ADA1500-4 and -8
|
|
|
Re: Sound Meter of Choice
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 289
local
|
local
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 289 |
Thanks, makes sense. I'll be getting my reciever tomorrow so I'll finally beable to sit down and give it a try.
Cheers
|
|
|
Re: Sound Meter of Choice
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458 |
I want to go back to Inanes' question:
How DO people use the SPL with their sub? Is there a test disc out there that gives a steady tone from 120Hz to 20Hz in 10Hz increments maybe, to allow someone to chart their standing waves in different locations?
My older, relatively-cheap JBL goes Boom, Boom, Boom in it's corner placement; when I get my new Axom setup I'd like to experiment with placement more precisely than my ear might allow, and since I already own the meter......
(Actually, I might as well ask if someone knows of a disc that starts at 20KHz.... might as well do it all at once!)
::::::: No disrespect to Axiom, but my favorite woofer is my yellow lab :::::::
|
|
|
Re: Sound Meter of Choice
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 206
local
|
local
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 206 |
check the SVS website at the FAQ section for instruction.
|
|
|
Re: Sound Meter of Choice
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 604
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 604 |
To answer INANE and MarkSJohnson:
Just download a sweep generator and run sweeps that cover from as low as it can go to a little above the transition point between the mains and subwoofer.
Also, for this you should have a Parametric EQ so that you can compensate for room modes. Never try to raise the nulls, instead just lower the peaks.
As for meter preference, I definitely prefer the digital. This is because the parallax error bugs me since I try to change frequency in the Sweep Generator at the same time as I look at the meter's readout. Plus, if you are doing single frequency test tones and set the meter to slow response, it won't be harder to interpret than an analog meter. Now, if you aren't doing single frequencies, if the levels change quickly, and if you put the meter on fast, the analog will be easier to read. Both of them use the same sensor (well the newer analog and the current digital) so precision and accuracy should be about the same. That said; remember to use the SPL Meter compensation chart on the SVS site to calibrate your meter when taking measurements.
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,489
Members15,617
|
Most Online2,082 Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
0 members (),
863
guests, and
3
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|