|
Re: M2i Grill Question
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 27
hobbyist
|
OP
hobbyist
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 27 |
Thanks for all of the great responses. I am most interested in the debate between the QS series vs the direct radiating as a rear center. When I called Axiom regarding my original M2i vs. M3i choice, they pointed me to the M2i without hesitating. I mentioned it specifically as a dedicated rear center, and they did not mention the QS series at all. Truthfully, I didn't even consider the QS line, thinking DR would be the only way to go. Might the QS series do a better job acting as a rear center?
I am choosing they 6.1 over the 7.1 for aesthetic reasons. Is the gain from 2 rears worth the added space consumed? Thanks again for your help.--Andy
|
|
|
Re: M2i Grill Question
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488 |
How about a VP100 back there
bibere usque ad hilaritatem
|
|
|
Re: M2i Grill Question
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 27
hobbyist
|
OP
hobbyist
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 27 |
Well....dang it.....that is another idea I haven't even considered. Though y'all are getting more expensive with each recommendation. How 'bout I mount a pair of M80s to my back wall? Just kidding, does the vp100 really make sense here? Or am I still looking at reflections putting the sound in front of me?
|
|
|
Re: M2i Grill Question
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 87
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 87 |
Yeah, I'm wondering that for myself.
Currently running 5.1, but have a speaker cable in the back wall for 6.1 when/if I want to do it. My receiver is 6.1.
I was thinking of another QS8 for the back surround, but maybe a VP100/150 might be better (and cheaper).
Room is 24x36.
Listening couch is centered 14 feet from the short wall, which puts the back surround 22 feet behind the couch.
Hmmm...
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,489
Members15,617
|
Most Online2,082 Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
0 members (),
1,092
guests, and
2
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|