Re: Is it true that Coaxial is better than Toslink
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,424
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,424 |
In reply to:
Yeah, some toslink connections don't give you a satisfying "click" and it seems a dust bunny could dislodge the cable.
Actually it has more to do with the fact that I tend to move my stuff around a fair bit. With coax I get a better connection and it never moves. I can't say the same for optical............but your sarcasm is noted none the less.
|
|
|
Re: Is it true that Coaxial is better than Toslink
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441 |
NeverHappy, ease out of defensive mode a smidge. I was not trying to be sarcastic. I was simply exaggerating to emphasize the unsecure nature of some toslink connections.
|
|
|
Re: Is it true that Coaxial is better than Toslink
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,424
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,424 |
Sorry, but I seem to be defending myself in more then one thread around here these day's that you are involved in.
I'm honestly not sure how to take your posts anymore...........but I will stop thinking defense.
|
|
|
Re: Is it true that Coaxial is better than Toslink
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,339
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,339 |
I have to say that if I have a audio problem, the first place I look is the toslink. Must be those gremlins.
|
|
|
Re: Is it true that Coaxial is better than Toslink?
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,056
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,056 |
In reply to:
More like electrical to optical and optical to electrical. It's all digital.
Yes. From what I understand, it's a little like morse code. Electrically, in a digital coax cable, this means that sending an electron down the pipe means "1" while absenceof an electron means "0". This, I believe, is an over simplification, but essentially, that is how it works. With the Toslink, essentially you have "light on" equals "1" while "light off" equals "0".
Both translate the source code, but do so in a perfect way - whereas with analog to digital, and vice-versa, there are always extrapolations or abbreviations that must be made, creating errors that degrade the sound.
In the end, if a toslink and a digital cable successfully carry the little "1's" and "0's" to the DAC, then the cable has perfectly done its job. Then, its up to the DAC to perform is math and figure what the sound should be.
If distance were not an issue, I would bet the farm on both sounding identical. In fact, some of my "digital" connections are being made with the el-cheapo spaghetti wire that came with my components. I figure if ther are sending the signal, all's well. I have not had any drop-outs or what I would diagnose as digital noise/static since hooking up the digital connections this way. (Saved some green, too)
|
|
|
Re: Is it true that Coaxial is better than Toslink?
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 65
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 65 |
I have used both (both cables were 6') on the same set-up and I couldn't see a difference.
The only difference I could see was that maybe the coax cable seemed a litte more durable????
"HK 630, M60's, QS8's, M22's, VP150, SVS 20-39PCi, Denon 2200, Hitachi 50V500"
|
|
|
Re: Is it true that Coaxial is better than Toslink
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441 |
But if your optical cable has gold-plated collars, then it's guaranteed to sound better.
Think about that for a second. Gold-plated collars. So the light moves better. Mmm hmm. Yeah.
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,984
Posts442,691
Members15,643
|
Most Online2,699 Aug 8th, 2024
|
|
0 members (),
595
guests, and
0
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|