Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
HD DVD/Blue Ray vs. Cable HD
#180881 10/29/07 02:05 PM
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 117
cameron Offline OP
veteran
OP Offline
veteran
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 117
Sorry if this has been covered, I couldn't find it on a search.

How does the quality of HD DVD compare to HD on Cable? I know it depends on the movie etc., I'm just looking for overall.

There is a big difference on my 65" screen between standard dvd's and cable 480i digital, so I was wondering if there was a difference like that between HD disks and HD cable. Probably not would be my guess because it's hard to imagine the quality improving that much.

Re: HD DVD/Blue Ray vs. Cable HD
cameron #180889 10/29/07 02:41 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,488
Likes: 9
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,488
Likes: 9
There is a difference. The format imposed on broadcaster is MPEG2 and capped at 19Mb/s (including audio). By comparison, Blue-ray disks are running at about 24Mb/s (max 48Mb/s) MPEG2 (or 16-24Mb/s MPEG4) while almost all HD-DVDs are at max 16-24Mb/s MPEG4 (all with audio).

Two things will (might) happen in the future:
1) BR and HD disks will get better and better as they get closer to their maximum (depends on how much "special features" are added to disks or if players will move to a "4+layers").
2) There is pressure to force all cable and TV devices to include VC-1 (MPEG4) codec to benefit from improved compression while maintaining the 19Mb/s cap.

Note: Some of the numbers above are from memory and also depends a lot on movie studios.


See Mojo's signature
Re: HD DVD/Blue Ray vs. Cable HD
EFalardeau #180891 10/29/07 02:49 PM
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 117
cameron Offline OP
veteran
OP Offline
veteran
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 117
Cool, thanks. So generally it's an obvious improvement or subtle? To me the jump from 480i digital cable to dvd quality is obvious/substantial to give you a point of reference.

Re: HD DVD/Blue Ray vs. Cable HD
cameron #180895 10/29/07 03:05 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,488
Likes: 9
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,488
Likes: 9
The difference is currently not as big (far from it). It will become eventually when enough HD-TVs can use 36-bits color, 24 frame-reates for movies and so on. But for now, (I have HD-DVD) the difference is there, but not enough to say "yuck!" on cable HD!


See Mojo's signature
Re: HD DVD/Blue Ray vs. Cable HD
EFalardeau #180919 10/29/07 05:36 PM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,077
Likes: 7
C
CV Offline
Founder, Axiom Upgrade Club
shareholder in the making
Offline
Founder, Axiom Upgrade Club
shareholder in the making
C
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,077
Likes: 7
I don't know if this is still accurate, but when I had HD on cable, scenes with a lot of motion always became a huge jaggied mess. I'd say that's the biggest difference.

Re: HD DVD/Blue Ray vs. Cable HD
CV #180920 10/29/07 05:42 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,488
Likes: 9
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,488
Likes: 9
That is usually caused by an insufficient processor in the decoder. How long ago was it? Do you remember the decoder's brand name?


See Mojo's signature
Re: HD DVD/Blue Ray vs. Cable HD
EFalardeau #180921 10/29/07 05:45 PM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,077
Likes: 7
C
CV Offline
Founder, Axiom Upgrade Club
shareholder in the making
Offline
Founder, Axiom Upgrade Club
shareholder in the making
C
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,077
Likes: 7
I have no idea. It's been probably a year? My sense of time is horrible.

Re: HD DVD/Blue Ray vs. Cable HD
CV #180924 10/29/07 06:04 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,488
Likes: 9
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,488
Likes: 9
I got HD cable about 18 months ago, and the box they gave me was already 2 years old, with some sort of HMDI version that only ever worked with itself. It was just horrible.

When I complained (actually cancelled the deal and demanded to be re-imbursed), they finally "found out" that they had a newer model in stock. That one works a lot better (HDMI is still not really working because of insufficient output speed), but is still far from good. (I have heard that my cable company--Videotron--is at last getting rid of those awful Scientific Atlantic boxes).

In general, large cable or phone companies operations' departments do not like to deploy new machines unless they are forced to (because of retraining and stuff). So you possibly had a box that used to be top-of-line when they started to evaluate and deploy it quite some time ago! \:\)


See Mojo's signature
Re: HD DVD/Blue Ray vs. Cable HD
cameron #180945 10/30/07 12:14 AM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 602
H
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
H
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 602
 Originally Posted By: cameron
Cool, thanks. So generally it's an obvious improvement or subtle? To me the jump from 480i digital cable to dvd quality is obvious/substantial to give you a point of reference.


I don't know that there is as big of a jump as SD to HD on Cable. I have both Bluray and HDDVD. It's nice, but as compared to DiscoveryHD, it's not a "WOW" difference.

I couldn't even tell the difference between 60fps and 24fps to be honest with you.


--
Denon 4520, EPIC80/500/VP180 Speakers

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,480
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 1,044 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4