material construction
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
i see that you use titanium tweeters, since metal tweeters such as aluminum and titanium are known to reproduce "revealing" sounds rather than the "smooth" sounds of silk. but what are the advantages of an aluminum woofer, specifically over polypropylene, kevlar, and laminated paper? just curious as to your design theory.
|
|
|
Re: material construction
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,387 Likes: 8
President connoisseur
|
President connoisseur
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,387 Likes: 8 |
We have been using in some of our models and doing design experiments on metal cones since 1985 and have a good depth of knowledge into their characteristics. To sum it up as briefly as possible, the main advantage is the cone rigidity, which stops the cone itself from distorting especially at higher output levels. The disadvantage can be resonance if the characteristics of the cone are not designed properly. We know how to do it properly and avoid any of the resonance issues. This means you can have smoothness and accuracy at all volume levels.
Ian Colquhoun
President & Chief Engineer
Ian Colquhoun President & Chief Engineer
|
|
|
Re: material construction
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,460 Likes: 6
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,460 Likes: 6 |
With all due respect to Ian, have you sought out the thoughts of speaker designers who use different material? I am sure, as with all things in the world, they would have reasons why they choose differing materials.
If you have, I would be most interested in hearing some thoughts.
Regards,
BBIBH
|
|
|
Re: material construction
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,387 Likes: 8
President connoisseur
|
President connoisseur
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,387 Likes: 8 |
The conversation comes up about cone materials from time to time. Have had a few lengthy discussions about it in fact. For our own research we do a lot of testing with as many various cone materials as we can avail ourselves of. There are a number of factors to consider, not the least of which is price. Metal cones are more expensive than most of the materials available so we use a number of different cone materials ourselves in less expensive models. The cone material, assuming the other design factors about the speaker are equal, will normally have its greatest impact at higher volume levels. I am sure other designers have their own research into this subject but, as I am sure you can appreciate, we need to rely on ours.
Ian Colquhoun
President & Chief Engineer
Ian Colquhoun President & Chief Engineer
|
|
|
Re: material construction
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,460 Likes: 6
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,460 Likes: 6 |
Having been part of the audio landscape for some time, I can remember the numerous changes in materials from manufacturers. WIth regards to your older and newer lines, you once offered metal cone drivers in the best of the lines and subs. Now you offer in most models. What made you switch the AX3-M50/60 size model from the older material to metal? Is the performance that much greater?
Regards,
BBIBH
|
|
|
Re: material construction
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,387 Likes: 8
President connoisseur
|
President connoisseur
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,387 Likes: 8 |
Yes, we started by using metal cones for all our upper end sub-woofer applications. The benefits are very high, especially at higher volume levels and lower frequencies. We worked for quite a period to get the metal cones operating perfectly through all frequencies and then introduced the Millennia line with all metal cones. The results are awesome in my opinion especially given the higher dynamic requirements that Home Theater requires.
Ian Colquhoun
President & Chief Engineer
Ian Colquhoun President & Chief Engineer
|
|
|
Re: material construction
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,460 Likes: 6
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,460 Likes: 6 |
In terms of my current AX3's I had replaced the drivers about 3-4 years ago because of problems. Would there be an advantage of moving to the new drivers? I would assume the drivers are not radically different in design.
If there was a problem with my current drivers, and I needed to have them replaced under warranty, would they be the newer drivers? I am not experiencing any problems...in case you are thinking the worst!
Regards,
BBIBH
|
|
|
Re: material construction
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,387 Likes: 8
President connoisseur
|
President connoisseur
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,387 Likes: 8 |
Since the x-over, cabinet volume, and porting are all designed to be one with the components; I would not recommend changing your AX3 components. You could always upgrade the whole speaker to the M60s though.
Ian Colquhoun
President & Chief Engineer
Ian Colquhoun President & Chief Engineer
|
|
|
Re: material construction
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,460 Likes: 6
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,460 Likes: 6 |
Yes, I have looked at that. However, if I was to look at that option, I would likely aim higher.
Regards,
BBIBH
|
|
|
Re: material construction
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
But aren't metal drivers a lot heavier than paper, kevlar, and polypropylene ones? Does this mean that metal cones aren't as quick and responsive as ones made of lighter materials above? I would think that this would make the bass sound mushy, especially in musical passages or theatrical scenes that require quick, responsive bass (i.e. trills and drum rolls in music; rapid-fire machine gun blasts in home theater). Please advise.
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,489
Members15,617
|
Most Online2,082 Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
0 members (),
1,092
guests, and
2
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|