Re: Bryston vs Axiom Amps
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 504
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 504 |
I agree with Dr. House.
Some of the cables, like 2x6's Mapleshades, are thin enough that that would be causing some roll off on the highs, but I think most are just snake oil. So, if someone has some bright speakers then these are the cables for them. An easier (and much cheaper!) fix would be to get an EQ and just trim the high frequencies slightly.
|
|
|
Re: Bryston vs Axiom Amps
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044 |
Well.... and more accurate.
I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
|
|
|
Re: Bryston vs Axiom Amps
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,751 Likes: 38
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,751 Likes: 38 |
I agree with Dr. House.
Some of the cables, like 2x6's Mapleshades, are thin enough that that would be causing some roll off on the highs, but I think most are just snake oil. You'd think so, because for some, theory trumps experience. However, I can attest that the Mapleshades do not suffer from high end roll off. Au contrere ma amie, the highs are crystal-like in their purity. Bass is pure and strong. Mids? Love 'em. Mapleshade Clearview Golden Double Helix, a wonderful mouthful, great cables, try 'em.
Enjoy the Music. Trust your ears. Laugh at Folks Who Claim to Know it All.
|
|
|
Re: Bryston vs Axiom Amps
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654 |
A very thin speaker wire might indeed demonstrate an audible "difference", but if so, it'd be a bad one. As discussed some time ago, it wouldn't necessarily involve a roll-off in the highs. There are two effects when a very thin speaker wire is used; the more obvious is that its higher resistance leads to more of the power being used in the connecting wire rather than being delivered to the speaker. This is because two resistances in series(e.g., the connecting wire and the wire in the speaker driver)form a "voltage divider", and the voltage leaving the receiver is used up in proportion to the speaker wire resistance as compared to the driver wire resistance, i.e, if the speaker wire was so thin and long that its resistance(e.g., 4 ohms)actually equalled the impedance of the speaker at a particular frequency, half the voltage(and resulting power)would be lost on the way to the speaker. Usually it's much less than this, of course, and typical receivers have plenty of power to spare, so this is the less significant effect.
The other, more significant effect is that since the speaker impedance usually varies widely at different frequencies, while the resistance of the speaker wire stays the same, the proportion of the total voltage and power used by the speaker driver likewise varies with frequency. This results in the frequency response fluctuating up and down with impedance and less accurate sound.
This is all a result of the well-understood voltage divider effect and no amount of reliance on a simplistic "Just trust your ears" mantra can change the facts.
-----------------------------------
Enjoy the music, not the equipment.
|
|
|
Re: Bryston vs Axiom Amps
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,751 Likes: 38
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,751 Likes: 38 |
Well, there's theory, and there's practice. I picked up both my M3s and the Mapleshades after reading on-line reviews. Enjoy the Music, the very site which introduced me to Axiom speakers had a wonderful review of the Mapleshades.
They tried them, rather than theorized about them. I suppose theorizing about the cables is OK, but it would be better to apply theory to explain the experience rather than attempting to predict the experience on the basis of theory.
So, now that you have announced your theoretical conclusions, why don't you put them to the test?
Anyway, the effect is subtle and pleasant. Mapleshades, my personal favorite speaker cables.
Enjoy the Music. Trust your ears. Laugh at Folks Who Claim to Know it All.
|
|
|
Re: Bryston vs Axiom Amps
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 769
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 769 |
My personal opinion: if you believe the cables will help, you might ear a difference even if there is none. If you don't, you probably won't even if there is. The brain is a very tricky device...
Bruno M80s/VP180/QS8s/EP600/AVR-890 ------------------------------------ "The problem is choice..."
|
|
|
Re: Bryston vs Axiom Amps
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,751 Likes: 38
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,751 Likes: 38 |
The brain is a very tricky device.
Ain't that just the bleeping truth.
Enjoy the Music. Trust your ears. Laugh at Folks Who Claim to Know it All.
|
|
|
Re: Bryston vs Axiom Amps
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420 |
Unfortunately none of what JohnK has said is theory, it is solid physic/elctromecahnical laws, what we hear is in fact practice or theorectical as it can never really be proven nor disproven, since we all hear and like different things and it is a ll VERY subjective.
What I know is that if the wiring has an affect on the SQ when using the same amp/speakers/inputs etc. then you can be rest assured it is changing the sound from what it is supposed to be, whether that be bad or good is in the ear of the listener.
Jason M80 v2 VP160 v3 QS8 v2 PB13 Ultra Denon 3808 Samsung 85" Q70
|
|
|
Re: Bryston vs Axiom Amps
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 16,441 |
You're using the word theory when you should be using hypothesis, 2x6. John, coming from a scientific background, used it correctly. The two are not interchangeable. Please read at least the first sentence at the link below to better understand why I found it important to pick nits here. http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-the-difference-between-a-theory-and-a-hypothesis.htm
|
|
|
Re: Bryston vs Axiom Amps
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,751 Likes: 38
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,751 Likes: 38 |
Well, there's hypothesis, and there's practice. I picked up both my M3s and the Mapleshades after reading on-line reviews. Enjoy the Music, the very site which introduced me to Axiom speakers had a wonderful review of the Mapleshades.
They tried them, rather than hypothesizing about them. I suppose hypothesizing about the cables is OK, but it would be better to hypothesize in order to explain the experience rather than attempting to predict the experience on the basis of an hypothesis.
So, now that you have announced your hypothesis, why don't you test it?
Anyway, the effect is subtle and pleasant. Mapleshades, my personal favorite speaker cables.
Enjoy the Music. Trust your ears. Laugh at Folks Who Claim to Know it All.
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,949
Posts442,508
Members15,619
|
Most Online2,082 Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
0 members (),
469
guests, and
4
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|