Another reason not to get into the 3D fad.
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 504
aficionado
|
OP
aficionado
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 504 |
|
|
|
Re: Another reason not to get into the 3D fad.
|
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 670
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 670 |
I have to say, I have no interest in this at all
|
|
|
Re: Another reason not to get into the 3D fad.
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 34
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 34 |
Exactly, not interested in the 3D "fad"
M80's, VP-180(waiting patiently), 4xQS8's, EP-350 M22's, VP-150, 2xQS8's
|
|
|
Re: Another reason not to get into the 3D fad.
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,015 |
Only if glasses free and not much of an increase in cost would I have any interest. I know several people that can only see out of one eye. I don't suppose that they would have any interest either.
|
|
|
Re: Another reason not to get into the 3D fad.
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,863
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,863 |
I have been looking at new displays for a while now, and in the last couple of months, EVERYONE is recommending these 3D displays... at a certain point i was thinking i was the ONLY one who doesn't want a 3D display, all i want is a REALLY nice 2D display.... glad to see at least 2 other people have the same opinion that i do! Thanks guys!
|
|
|
Re: Another reason not to get into the 3D fad.
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420 |
I have no desire in 3D either, I watched Sony's demo in a store and it was interesting but the PQ was a little fuzzy to me. I had a hard time keeping things clear, in focus. I can see gaming making use of this technology, but I still do not want to wear glasses to watch TV/Movie/play a game, so until that happens I am opting out.
Jason M80 v2 VP160 v3 QS8 v2 PB13 Ultra Denon 3808 Samsung 85" Q70
|
|
|
Re: Another reason not to get into the 3D fad.
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,789
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,789 |
No no, we've had a pretty big discussion already about how fed up we all are about the industry treating $3000+ dollar telivisions as 'disposable' merchandise, & that we weren't going to buy into it. It used to be when you went down to shop for tv's, you were ready to purchase something that you planned to enjoy for the next few decades anyway. Now-a-days it seems as if the salesmen are practically telling us, "oh yes, this is our top of the line Plasma/LCD/LED/Laser/DPL that we carry right now, & it should do you very nicely until the 2160p/3D/Hologram/Chrome Electron sets come out in a year or two. At which time you should be sure to come back and upgrade because they're going to be spectacular"!!! Piss on that. If everyone is out to get a 3D set then at least the really good 2D sets will hopefully come down in price & I can get a good 1 for the bedroom. I guess I should check on ebay for used 65 inch 2D sets, I'll just bet there are people trying to unload their 1 or 2 year old sets cheap so they can get the latest and greatest 3D displays. I'm up for a good cheap 65 inch LCD/LED/Plasma!
My Stuff :
M80's QS8's VP150 EP800 Denon 4802 Emotiva XPA-3 Samsung BD-P3600 Sharp 65 Inch Aquos LCD
|
|
|
Re: Another reason not to get into the 3D fad.
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,928
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,928 |
Other than seeing 7 of 9 in 3D, I have no use for this technology.
"That is irrelevant".....
Half of communication is listening. You can't listen with your mouth.
|
|
|
Re: Another reason not to get into the 3D fad.
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 915
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 915 |
Call me old fashioned, but I consider a 3D movie special enough to get me to venture out to the theater to see it on a huge screen. I have a 3D blu-ray, and while I think it's cool, it's nowhere near the enjoyment I get watching 3D at the theater. If I had it at home, it would quickly become old and bothersome...especially if I'm forced to wear glasses watching it. I already see myself switching the tv to 2D for most viewing.
Oh...and I prefer to take out my contacts at night to watch tv. Therefore, I need to wear my eyeglasses. Are they gonna make goggles to fit over eyeglasses?
Last edited by sonicfox; 06/29/10 12:07 AM.
M60s VP150 QS8s Marantz SR6003 Samsung LN52B550 Oppo DV-980H Insignia NS-WBRDVD
|
|
|
Re: Another reason not to get into the 3D fad.
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,786 |
Other than seeing 7 of 9 in 3D, I have no use for this technology.
"That is irrelevant"..... Invite me over when you get that movie OK?
Fred
------- Blujays1: Spending Fred's money one bottle at a time, no two... Oh crap!
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,480
Members15,617
|
Most Online2,082 Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
0 members (),
993
guests, and
2
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|