Get Free, Friendly, Expert Advice
Call 1-888-352-9466 or email

Designed and Manufactured in Canada Since 1980

Axiom Dolby Atmos 7.2.4 Cinema
Solarrdadd's 7.1 Apartment HT!
AxiomAudio Blog

Insider’s Sneak Peek: AxiomAeris

Axiom’s New Computer Speakers

Blind Listening Tests

Who's Online
6 registered (Mojo, Pitbully, DrStrangeQuark, jules, Socketman, J. B.), 65 Guests and 5 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
13,584 Registered Members
11 Forums
23,434 Topics
415,527 Posts

Most users ever online: 378 @ 02/24/13 04:33 PM
Top Posters
Ken.C 18030
pmbuko 16418
SirQuack 13369
CV 11588
MarkSJohnson 11376
Meanwhile On Facebook
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#63200 - 10/04/04 12:26 AM Yeah more advice ...m3ti vs m22ti or ..
leaf Offline
old hand

Registered: 09/17/04
Posts: 64
Thanks for readin this,

AS per another thread my reciever arrives tomarrow. My budget for speakers has become limited for the short term..but i want to hear these axioms.

I can afford the m3ti's now or I can wait to afford the m22ti's or even the m40's. So do I wait or do I buy now, then if the m3's aren't what I need just hang on to them to use as 6-7th speaker in a 7.1 rig?

Obviously I'm looking for an excuse to buy now

My other aurguement has religious conotations about the evils of not having good speakers for another month.

Help convince the girl friend!! We won't be able to go out for a bit, sooner or later anyway!

All advice, comments, humor will be read and kept in strictest confidence.


"Scripts are ebil"

#63201 - 10/04/04 12:55 AM Re: Yeah more advice ...m3ti vs m22ti or ..
JohnK Offline
shareholder in the making

Registered: 05/11/02
Posts: 10528
L, sell the girlfriend and you'll be able to get the speakers that you deserve right now.....Okay, that's all the humor you get and as to the model of the speakers, I have the M22s and haven't heard the M3s, but the measurements and listener reports lead me to believe that I wouldn't care for the slightly recessed M3 midrange as much as the very clear M22 presentation. So, get the M22s when possible and QSs later for the surrounds.

Enjoy the music, not the equipment.

#63202 - 10/04/04 02:02 AM Re: Yeah more advice ...m3ti vs m22ti or ..
BrenR Offline

Registered: 12/10/03
Posts: 3602
Loc: Winnipeg MB Canada
In reply to:

I wouldn't care for the slightly recessed M3 midrange

Hmm.. if you average out the half that say the mids are recessed against the half that say the mids are too forward, you end up with a perfectly flat response!

I own M3s, I really like them... they stand alone very well.

Bren R.

#63203 - 10/04/04 02:12 AM Re: Yeah more advice ...m3ti vs m22ti or ..
2x6spds Offline

Registered: 03/16/02
Posts: 2820
Loc: CA, USA

My recommendation? Get the M2Es if you have or are getting a sub, get the M3 if you're not.

Leaf, I don't think you can tell much about how a speaker will sound from its graph. I've had both M3Tis and M22s. I personally prefer the M3s. If you find the reviews for the M3Tis you'll see they are extremely well thought of - they are giant killers - extremely musical, rich mids, air, open highs - superb speakers. For what it's worth, if I were in your position, and my speaker budget was a bit tight, I'd jump on the M3s and never look back.

Here's the Sound Stage 2000 review of the M3Tis resulting in the M3Tis winning the best speaker award.

Here's how Doug Schneider summed it up, "The M3Ti is a great inexpensive loudspeaker that brings high-quality sound down to a ridiculously low price. Itís not the only speaker of its type -- Paradigm and PSB have some models that do the trick too. But line this one up alongside because it is wholly competitive. When you listen to this speaker, you will hear a surprisingly refined product that may trick you into thinking it is more expensive than it is -- waaaay more expensive.

To me, this speaker is a true find. Try it, buy it, and if youíre embarrassed to tell someone how much it cost, spill the beans anyway. You'll look like an audio genius."

Of course, the M22s won the award the next year. Here's a quote from their comparison of the M22 with the M3: "Moving up into and through the midrange, the M22Ti SE continues to ascend to a level of liquidity that the M3Ti SE canít quite match. I have to be careful not to step on the toes of the M3Ti SE; itís a wonderful speaker in this regard. But the M22Ti SE has a more smoothly flowing nature about it in the midrange. By comparison, and only direct comparison, the M3Ti SE can sound a tiny bit grainy. The M22Ti SE does not, as should be the case for 40% more money. I also believe that the M22Ti SE's midrange performs a more successful segue into the treble, resulting in a slightly more seamless and coherent presentation.

To be sure, we are talking about a relatively small degree of improvement here, but a musically significant one all the same."

Colin Flood reviewed the M3s for Enjoy the Music. Here's an excerpt: "The low-priced Axiom M3Tis impressed me greatly with their clarity and resolution, particularly in the crucial midrange area. The midrange is open and clear. They have a level of smoothness normally associated with high-end loudspeakers. The bass and the smooth mid-range make for one very listenable and enjoyable charmer of a cherry box.

In fact, the only loudspeaker I have heard with a smoother, more liquid mid-range and crisp treble presentation was the JM Lab Cobalts, backed by Audio Refinement equipment. Yet, that set-up was four times the price. It was not merely smooth however; it bordered on the lush, Hagen-Dazô rich and creamy side."

Although Doug Schneider loved the M3TiEs, he went ape over the M2s! Here'a an excerpt:

"As for the other stuff I'd been listening to, Ani DiFranco's Like I Said (Songs 1990-91) [Righteous Babe Records RBR005-D] is recorded rather poorly and is rather lightweight-sounding with too much high-frequency hash -- obviously, a subwoofer's not going to change that -- but now there was bass energy that helped balance things out. The already robust The Ghost of Tom Joad gained some additional weight, and that resulted in an even more majestic sound with an increased sense of space. Norah Jonesí piano on Come Away with Me [Blue Note Records 32088] had the sort of richness and vibrancy that I knew was there but was absent when the M2i was on its own. The bass guitar and drums were fleshed out so wonderfully and with such detail and control that I could do nothing but sit back and enjoy this speaker system -- a $255 satellite and a $3000 sub!

This Axiom/Revel marriage sounded similar to the excellent $5500 Ethera Vitae loudspeakers that I recently reviewed. The Ethera is still a bit more refined and articulate in the upper end. And it also has a little more see-through transparency -- obviously there is room for improvement in drivers and cabinets beyond what this little Axiom costs. But both systems share a clean, clear, open, uncolored, and "boxless" sound. These put into perspective just how much the M2i achieves. Itís an inexpensive, micro-sized super-achiever.

Family feud

The M3Ti SE, with its 6 1/2" woofer, goes deeper, and as a result is a little weightier-sounding than the M2i. Because of that, itís actually closer to being the perfect all-around, low-priced bookshelf-sized speaker because it stands alone easier. Its caveat is that itís not as neutral as the M2i. The mids of the M3Ti SE are a bit more relaxed, and that means that voices donít jump out at you quite as much. The overall presentation from the M3Ti SEs tends to be a little on the warmer side, while the M2i is a little leaner. Thatís precisely why Axiom says that the M2i has more in common with the $400 M22Ti SE than with the M3Ti SE.

Both the M2i and M3Ti SE play to about the same volume level, but when the M3Ti SE starts getting taxed, the woofer loses control and some port chuffing can be heard. It tries to do more down low, and its failure is more obvious. The way the M2i handles deep bass is by simply not doing it. Still, it gets stressed when played too loud, which manifests itself as some hardness and congestion in the upper bass and lower mids. In the end, each speaker can only play so loud, which is reasonably loud in even moderate-sized rooms, but the effects of the speakers hitting their limits are a little different.

Which speaker you should choose will depend on various factors. As I mentioned, the M3Ti SE and M22Ti SE are rather full-sounding speakers. If you are not a bass freak, you can easily get away with no subwoofer with either of these speakers. The M2i, though, is light down low and falls into the just acceptable range of bass performance. That makes for the next biggest difference.

When I played the robust-sounding The Ghost of Tom Joad I was surprised at just how rich and vibrant the M2is sounded. However, when I played something a little less forward and full, they sounded a bit thin. A good example of this is Ani DiFranco's Like I Said (Songs 1990-91), due to its inherently lightweight sound and excessive high frequencies.

All the Axiom bookshelf speakers can benefit from subwoofer reinforcement; itís the M2i that begs to be mated with one -- and not just because it has the least extension. The way it rolls off in the bass seems to make it the easiest to match to a sub, and this highlights its prime advantage over the other two Axiom speakers if you choose to go that route."
Enjoy the Music. Trust your ears. Laugh at Folks Who Claim to Know it All.

#63204 - 10/04/04 08:27 AM Re: Yeah more advice ...m3ti vs m22ti or ..
bridgman Offline

Registered: 08/25/04
Posts: 5590
Loc: Bowmanville, Ontario, Canada
How big is your listening room ? There seems to be a general feeling that the M22s can fill a big room a bit better than the M2s, and presumably the same applies for M22 vs M3s. The difference will be fairly small, but if your room is real big then waiting for the M22s might be worth it...

#63205 - 10/04/04 09:32 AM Re: Yeah more advice ...m3ti vs m22ti or ..
littleb Offline

Registered: 08/03/03
Posts: 1235
Loc: Moorhead, Minnesota/US
I haven't heard the m3s, but I do own the m22s. I auditioned the m50s, and some say that these are similar to the m3s. I found the m50s to be very laid back compared to the m22s. Enough so that I preferred the "forward" qualities of 22s. In choosing one over the other you might want to consider the quality of sound you are looking for. If you prefer a laid back sound the m3s I'm sure will more than suffice. Before I made my purchase I had been listening to these type of speakers for years, and I needed a change. And I got that with the m22s.

#63206 - 10/04/04 10:44 AM Re: Yeah more advice ...m3ti vs m22ti or ..
jorge016 Offline

Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 248
Loc: Minnesota
I can't say enough good things about my M22's. I was tempted to go with the M3's but went with the M22's because of the size of our room. You can always save a little with the Factory Outlet if you're not in a big rush.
M22's, VP150, QS4's, HK 630, HSU VTF3-MKII

#63207 - 10/06/04 01:49 PM Re: Yeah more advice ...m3ti vs m22ti or ..
leaf Offline
old hand

Registered: 09/17/04
Posts: 64
Thank you all so much for the excellent replies.

I hooked up my Brand spankin new Denon 2805 to my current speakers a set of tiny jbl's. And I think I blew out the right front while trying to erase an audition of some Martin Logans. This makes a speaker purchase very important.

I have a homemade passive sub that does an amazing job in a 15x25 space. Is that too much space for book shelves to handle?

I'm just gonna call axiom and ask them what they think.

I just paid my bills for the month and I have quite a bit more leaway than I thought.

Thanks again for the replies!


#63208 - 10/06/04 09:59 PM Re: Yeah more advice ...m3ti vs m22ti or ..
bridgman Offline

Registered: 08/25/04
Posts: 5590
Loc: Bowmanville, Ontario, Canada
>>I have a homemade passive sub that does an amazing job in a 15x25 space. Is that too much space for book shelves to handle?

Depends how loud you want to play, but unless you promise to only want to play at moderate levels I imagine the M2/M3s would be too small. I bought M2s for a small room, liked them so much I replaced my existing stereo speakers with them (in a much larger room), loved the sound in the big room as long as I was playing quietly but they just weren't happy producing any kind of high volume in the larger room (duh !! ).

Anyways, I was so happy with Axiom in general I bought a pair of M60s, which are clearly enough for the room (13x23) enough so that I imagine M22s would be OK.

For a 15x25 room I would go with M22s at minimum, but definitely talk to Axiom first.

#63209 - 10/12/04 11:12 PM Re: Yeah more advice ...m3ti vs m22ti or ..
donaldekelly Offline

Registered: 08/12/04
Posts: 274
Loc: Washington, DC
I bought the M3s and then upgraded to the M22s within 30 days. Free return shipping when upgrading unless you buy from the "scratch and dent" store. (Has anyone ever found a flaw when ordering from there? Not me.)

The M3s were good. I think the M22s are more detailed. A little too much high end on only 2 cds so far (Jackson Brown and Steely Dan) but only duruing guitar solos. Didn't bother me much at all - probably more accurate in fact.

M22s, QS4s, M2 center, Hsu stf-1.

#63210 - 10/12/04 11:38 PM Re: Yeah more advice ...m3ti vs m22ti or ..
INANE Offline

Registered: 02/04/04
Posts: 1693
Loc: Omaha, Nebraska
I own M3's and have heard M22's... both are excelent speakers and yes they do have different type of sound. So simply put I'd say determine what your personal preference is and your decision is complete.

HT v2.0 !
HT v1.0

Page 1 of 2 1 2 >

Moderator:  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Home  |  Corporate Info  |  Products  |  Message Board  |  FAQs  |  Warranty  |  Site Map  |  Privacy Statement   |  Contact Us

©2015 Colquhoun Audio Laboratories Limited
All Rights Reserved.