>>Would I notice a significant diffrence with the m60's? Would they better match the vp150?

I guess the big question is whether you noticed a difference in the midrange when going from the M22s to the M50s (eg. vocals and instruments sounded a tiny bit less sharp) and if so which sound you preferred. M50s sort of sound like big M3s, M60s sort of sound like big M22s. Strictly speaking the M60s are a bit more "flat" than the 50s but if your room is fairly "live" (bare walls or floors etc) then the 50s might be a better match for your room.

There is obviously a big difference in bass between M50 and M22 so it's sometimes hard to hear the difference in the upper midrange. If you feel that the M50s are missing anything compared to the M22s (and you liked the 22s better in that regard) then the 60s will be more like the M22s. If you didn't notice a difference in the midrange, or preferred the 50s over the 22s in terms of midrange sound, then I would stay with the 50s. The difference is supposed to be fairly small anyways.

>>But hey!! I didn't know all you guys were as old as I

Hands up everyone who is NOT old enough to remember quadraphonic systems

Last edited by bridgman; 08/07/05 06:58 PM.

M60ti, VP180, QS8, M2ti, EP500, PC-Plus 20-39
M5HP, M40ti, Sierra-1
LFR1100 active, ADA1500-4 and -8