Also I might add, the Van Halen cuts were rare. Most of the time the WMA tracks are noticably cleaner/better. I was just very confused why there were so many Van Halen songs that sounded better at 128 kbps than at 900? And just in case you were wondering, it wasn't just the '1984' album that this occured, so I can rule out it being a bum CD. I noticed this on various Van Halen songs, and on some Smashing Pumpkins and Pink Floyd tracks. When I compared some Tom Cochrane tracks though, the WMA songs were the cleaner/better versions. Same was the case with the ZZ Top tracks, Great White tracks, and the Journey tracks I sampled. So it's not a case where WMA sucks or anything like that. It's just... well, I don't know what it is?
