Does it not strike anyone as a little odd that there has been no direct indepth (or any depth) comparison of the M50s to the M60s?
I would call it inconvenient, for sure
The problem is that most of the comparison reports you see are driven entirely by the speakers which people living nearby (within "lugging distance") happen to own. One person decides to haul their speakers over to the other person's house, beer is opened, snacks are brought out, and the comparison begins.
I would argue that the whole mechanism is self-selecting for small vs large comparisons simply because carrying a small speaker over to someone's house is a whole lot easier than carrying a set of towers.
There are also some comparisons which result from an upgrade but in those cases it's relatively rare to upgrade only one level unless the new speakers are the top of the line (which explains the M60-to-M80 reviews). If Axiom made M100s then I'm sure you would see a lot more M60-to-M100 reviews than M60-to-M80...
