Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
m80's, which receiver?
#101262 07/04/05 05:12 PM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6
S
regular
OP Offline
regular
S
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6
So I got myself some m80's. Love them. Right now they are power off of a Carver tfm-15, and ct-17 pre/pro combo. I love the sound of these things. So, I am also going to order the rest of the package which would be the qs8's and vp-150 center. I have a HSU st3-mk2 for the sub.

My question is this.

What receivers can handle the 4 ohm load? I was looking into the 3805, yammie 2500/4600, and hk 635. I'm not familiar with rotel or nad models.

These speakers are all going in a media room that is being built now. And the carver amps are staying in another section of the house for another set of speakers I have.

So, in the media room, I'd love to be able to get a receiver with the sound I am looking for. I do favor a brighter sound. This room will be used for %65 movies, the rest music/gaming on xbox. The room has a 110" screen/infocus pj.

We listen to pop/rock/top 40, rap, little country, alternative. I like really good bass ( hence the hsu) and good bright and clear highs. And that is where the confusion begins. I'm not too caught up in having 40,000 dsp modes when I know I'll only use maybe 2. I'm more interested in having a good sounding amp that sounds similar to my carver setup now. 2 zones would be nice as well. I do run my current system through a kenwood 7030 eq,and I always want an eq. So the new amp has to have a decent eq. Please don't tell me about room treatments, I know all about that. I still want a eq.

So, From what I am reading here, the hk is considered warm, so that rules the 635 out. Besides, I want something with more power although with hk's rep I am sure it would do fine power wise. 110-120watts min.

It seems most posts here say to avoid yamaha and pioneer. But audioholics members seem the think the bigger 2500 and newer 4600 handle the 4 ohm load just fine. Who do I believe?

Re: m80's, which receiver?
#101263 07/04/05 05:37 PM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 7
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 7
>>the hk is considered warm

Do you mean "acoustically warm" or "thermally warm" ? I would agree that the HKs tend to run a bit hot (high bias current ?) but I don't think many would agree that the HK receivers colour the sound.

Don't know if anyone has had a chance to A/B a 630/635 vs. the equivalently priced Denon (is that a 2805 or 3805 ?) to see how they compare at high SPLs but my guess is that there would not be much difference between them (despite the power ratings).

Anyways, can you tell I own an HK ?


M60ti, VP180, QS8, M2ti, EP500, PC-Plus 20-39
M5HP, M40ti, Sierra-1
LFR1100 active, ADA1500-4 and -8
Re: m80's, which receiver?
#101264 07/04/05 06:20 PM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6
S
regular
OP Offline
regular
S
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6
thanks

Just to add, everything I have read indicates that the hk series are warm sounding.

Re: m80's, which receiver?
#101265 07/04/05 06:29 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,424
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,424
I would also agree that HK's are in fact "Warm". I have also attributed it to the high current design ever so slightly taming the natural highs that some speakers bring to the table.

I also find it funny that most who report that the HK's are not warm, have never heard one or taken the time to A/B against something else. HK, NAD, Marantz and a few others are what I would call "Warm". I strongly believe as I mentioned above that it has something to do with a high current design as every time I think something brings "Warmth" to the picture, it's always a high current unit.

Re: m80's, which receiver?
#101266 07/04/05 07:23 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,339
B
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
B
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,339
I have a 3805, but added three Outlaw Monos across the front. Luv em.

Re: m80's, which receiver?
#101267 07/04/05 08:44 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840
Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840
Likes: 13
According to Axiom, most Denon and HK AVR's will have no problems with 4ohm 80's. Can't comment on other brands..


M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350
AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85


Re: m80's, which receiver?
#101268 07/04/05 10:19 PM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 7
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 7
>>I would also agree that HK's are in fact "Warm". I have also attributed it to the high current design ever so slightly taming the natural highs that some speakers bring to the table.

This comes down to the old "what is neutral ?" question. One of the things I like about HKs is that I do get the same kind of sound that I associate with a high quality, high wattage power amp. If you use a good power amp as a reference, I would not call the HKs warm by comparison.

When you say HK, NAD, Marantz sound warm, what are you using as the reference ?


M60ti, VP180, QS8, M2ti, EP500, PC-Plus 20-39
M5HP, M40ti, Sierra-1
LFR1100 active, ADA1500-4 and -8
Re: m80's, which receiver?
#101269 07/04/05 10:22 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,270
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,270
Hi steves321,

The only brands of A/V receivers I recommend to drive the 4-ohm M80s (besides NAD) are Denon and H/K so long as you don't plan to use them in a huge room, in which case a separate power amp for the M80s would be essential. You could use the Carvers for the M80s and get a receiver for your other speakers if they are 8 or 6 ohms, which are easy to drive.

Yamahas, Onkyos, Pioneers and others typically use current limiting (with resultant reduced greatly reduced power output) into 4-ohm loads, although perhaps the most expensive Yamahas have more robust power supplies.

Keep in mind that H/K power output ratings are more conservative than many other brands, which tend to exaggerate power output specs.

Regards,


Alan Lofft,
Axiom Resident Expert (Retired)
Re: m80's, which receiver?
#101270 07/04/05 10:50 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,021
Likes: 1
C
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
C
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,021
Likes: 1
Alan - I was prepared to grab the NAD 773 receiver for our Epic 80 system, but was talked into the Arcam AVR-300.

Have you played with it at all ?

Re: m80's, which receiver?
#101271 07/05/05 12:01 AM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,444
Likes: 16
M
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
M
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,444
Likes: 16
Steve,

It would be very helpful if you could indicate your budget restrictions. There’s many, many receiver / amp manufactures that will drive the 80’s just dandy, but many of them start out over $1500. For the under $1500 budget you will be limited to the brands Alan mentioned. Rotel is also quite capable, and you can find models under $1500 as well. Out of the four mentioned, Rotel has the best warrantee.


Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,486
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 1,182 guests, and 5 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4