|
VP100 vs 150.
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 23
hobbyist
|
OP
hobbyist
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 23 |
Ive seen a lot of posts over the last year that Ive had my mt22s saying that the vp100 couldnt really keep up and that you should get the 150. I like the idea of having mt22s, vp 100, and qs8s because they all would have dual 5.25" matching mids. Id say im only watching movies like 10% of the time with stereo listening the other 90%. My rooms only about 15x18, so vp 100 & 150 owners, chime in and let me know which way to go.
|
|
|
Re: VP100 vs 150.
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,351
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,351 |
if you have the $$$, get the vp150
if you don't, get the vp100...
|
|
|
Re: VP100 vs 150.
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,490
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,490 |
If your physical setup allows the placement of a bookshelf speaker as a vertical center channel, then an M2 or M22 might well sound better than a VP100. And the price is "right"!
|
|
|
Re: VP100 vs 150.
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 333
devotee
|
devotee
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 333 |
I do love my VP 150.. Beautiful full sound.. And, it does fit into that over/under the set environment nice 'n neat..
As for an M22, I for one would have a hard time with placement.. Unless, you get it in eggshell white, and 'hang' if from the ceiling, centered, and tilted downward.. !!!? Hey, just a thought.. And, if I went that route, I would probably have the L/R 22's on stands or hanging as well.. It's hard to beat the sound from a speaker that is free of all surrounding surfaces..
LFE ! The rest is just details..
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,482
Members15,617
|
Most Online2,082 Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
0 members (),
701
guests, and
3
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|