|
QS8's, Diploe or Bipole?
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 43
buff
|
OP
buff
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 43 |
I have been reading about different surround speaker designs. I am not sure what to classify my QS8's as. They don't seem to fit cleanly into a category.
M22's
M60's
VP150
QS8's
EP350
Yamaha RX-V2700
Yamaha YP-D71
|
|
|
Re: QS8's, Diploe or Bipole?
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840 Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840 Likes: 13 |
They are neither Dipole or Bipole. If you read the description, they are Quadpolar designed. Meaning they have 4 drivers (2 woofers, 2 tweeters) firing in phase.
M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350 AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85
|
|
|
Re: QS8's, Diploe or Bipole?
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,301
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,301 |
A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing.
|
|
|
Re: QS8's, Diploe or Bipole?
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,331
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,331 |
They are quadpolar (drivers firing in 4 different directions) by design, but bipolar (driver firing in two different directions) in philosophy. Both bipolar and quadpolars have the drivers wired in phase. Dipoles have drivers firing in two different directions, like bipoles, but the driverws are wired out of phase to make the sound seem more diffused.
Jack
"People generally quarrel because they cannot argue." - G. K. Chesterton
|
|
|
Re: QS8's, Diploe or Bipole?
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 43
buff
|
OP
buff
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 43 |
Thanks, I did actually look at the description but somehow missed this. And it's nice to know that they operate like a bipolar speaker in theory. Now when I am reading I can relate to a particular type.
M22's
M60's
VP150
QS8's
EP350
Yamaha RX-V2700
Yamaha YP-D71
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,487
Members15,617
|
Most Online2,082 Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
0 members (),
562
guests, and
4
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|