Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
M22 vs M60 and M22 vs VP150
#185347 11/24/07 06:09 PM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 6
I
regular
OP Offline
regular
I
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 6
I just picked up an Onkyo 705. I am working on choosing my TV between a 58 Panny (1080p), 6070 Pioneer (768p), Samsung 52 LCD (5271), and trashing my budget and getting a Pioneer 6010.

I am working on a few subs - but am leaning towards the SVS PB12-Plus (because the cherry color is not-debatable with the wife).

So my speaker decision is somewhat constrained by the overall budget which can be spread out to a nicer TV and the expensive (to me) subwoofer.

My thought at present is:

3x M22s (L/R/Center)
2x QS8
SVS PB12-Plus

or

2x M60s
1x CP150 (or M22s)
2x QS8
(other cherry-wood Sub cheaper than the SVS due to the higher price of the M60s and CP150)

What do you guys think? Also I think the stands for the M22s are a bit expensive - any good alternatives without building?

Trying to keep my speaker budget to around 2K including sub. I could possibly even get a rear channel in that budget depending.

Thanks in advance for your advice. I am sure I will be happy with most any setup since I currently roll with the TV speaker on a 27" CRT that is 15 years old or so!

Re: M22 vs M60 and M22 vs VP150
Industrialstr #185380 11/24/07 11:06 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 725
HAY Offline
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 725
 Originally Posted By: Industrialstr
I am working on a few subs - but am leaning towards the SVS PB12-Plus (because the cherry color is not-debatable with the wife).
(other cherry-wood Sub cheaper than the SVS due to the higher price of the M60s and CP150)


So you are looking for a Cherry Wood Set up? Have you looked at the free upgrade to High Gloss Cherry (or Burlied Walnut) that Axiom is currently doing?




As for subs, wouldn't you want to get an EP500 in the same finish as your other speakers?


For some excellent pictures of the High Gloss see.. HERE



High Gloss Cherry
M60 VP150 QS8
Open for Auditions but please don't drool on the High Gloss
Re: M22 vs M60 and M22 vs VP150
HAY #185385 11/24/07 11:25 PM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 6
I
regular
OP Offline
regular
I
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 6
Well the price difference between the EP500 and the SVS PB12-Plus is a big factor. I won't pay that much for a sub unless it also does my laundry.

I am not sure about the gloss vs standard finish... will have to check with the wife.

My major dilemma is the M22s vs the M60s and the M22s vs the CP150.

Nice pictures by the way (and how do you like your HSU sub? If they made those in wood finish they would be in the running).

Re: M22 vs M60 and M22 vs VP150
Industrialstr #185388 11/24/07 11:45 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 725
HAY Offline
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 725
I went to the SVS website before the last post and saw they had the sub you referenced for a clearout price of $1000 or so. The EP500 is listed at roughly $100 more. I'm guessing you found it for cheaper?

I can't give you any input on the 22's vs the 60's as I've only heard the 22's in a local HVAC store in Burlington. There's been a lot of posts recently though that mentioned that the 22's are slightly more detailed than the 60's. So your ears preference will play more into which one you would want. The 22's have been compared to sound more like the M80's.

I've been very happy with my HSU. They used to have rosewood colors, not sure if they still do?

Where do you live? I'm in Burlington and you're welcome to come over for a listen sometime. By the way the HG Cherry pics were from another forum member in Toronto "DanielBme"


High Gloss Cherry
M60 VP150 QS8
Open for Auditions but please don't drool on the High Gloss
Re: M22 vs M60 and M22 vs VP150
HAY #185389 11/24/07 11:56 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490
Likes: 116
M
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
M
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490
Likes: 116
The 22s are more detailed, forward yet thin-sounding compared to the 60s. Many have been able to make the 22s sound warm with the addition of a sub. The 60s are less detailed but warmer and laid back. They become more detailed and forward with higher volumes.


House of the Rising Sone
Out in the mid or far field
Dedicated mid-woofers are over-rated
Re: M22 vs M60 and M22 vs VP150
Mojo #185404 11/25/07 01:16 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,745
Likes: 17
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,745
Likes: 17
 Originally Posted By: Mojo
The 22s are more detailed, forward yet thin-sounding compared to the 60s. Many have been able to make the 22s sound warm with the addition of a sub. The 60s are less detailed but warmer and laid back.

In one opinion.
The M22s, M60 and M80s are virtually identical in blind listening tests with subtle differences in the bass output, or perhaps not as subtle with the M22s vs. two large floorstanding speakers.
I agree the M22s should be paired with a sub.

 Quote:
They become more detailed and forward with higher volumes.

A common trait attributed to the fact that in listening tests human subjects will pick the louder and otherwise identical speaker as sounding 'better'.
Isn't science great?
Why yes, yes it is.
Am i talking to myself?
Why yes, yes i am.


"Those who preach the myths of audio are ignorant of truth."
Re: M22 vs M60 and M22 vs VP150
chesseroo #185406 11/25/07 01:56 AM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 6
I
regular
OP Offline
regular
I
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 6
The SVS sub is $799 as an overstock 'special' - so at the moment it is considerably cheaper.

I am in Tennessee - so I'm quite far from Burlington! Thanks though.

So ... besides the mains - how about the M22 in stead of the CP150?

Also - when people say that M22s sound better with a sub - does that mean some/many people run the M60s with no sub?

Thanks for all your opinions...

Re: M22 vs M60 and M22 vs VP150
Industrialstr #185426 11/25/07 05:13 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
Indy, welcome. Considering that you're going to be using a good sub, your proposal of three M22s across the front should be excellent, assuming that you'll have the room to properly place a vertical M22 center.


-----------------------------------

Enjoy the music, not the equipment.


Re: M22 vs M60 and M22 vs VP150
chesseroo #185427 11/25/07 05:28 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490
Likes: 116
M
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
M
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490
Likes: 116
In two opinions, Chess. Jakewash and I both heard the same thing \:\) .

Perhaps Axiom has tweaked these speakers over the years to the point where they now do sound considerably different compared to what some of you may have heard years ago.


House of the Rising Sone
Out in the mid or far field
Dedicated mid-woofers are over-rated
Re: M22 vs M60 and M22 vs VP150
JohnK #185430 11/25/07 05:49 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,569
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,569
 Originally Posted By: JohnK
Indy, welcome. Considering that you're going to be using a good sub, your proposal of three M22s across the front should be excellent, assuming that you'll have the room to properly place a vertical M22 center.


Hey Industrialstr, maybe I’m not as crazy as I thought.


3M80 2M22 6QS8 2M2 1EP500 Sony BDP-S590 Panny-7000 Onkyo-3007 Carada-134 Xbox Buttkicker AS-EQ1
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,482
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 685 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4