Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4
Re: high cost of anamorphic lens
Nick B #214408 07/04/08 09:56 PM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,077
Likes: 7
C
CV Offline
Founder, Axiom Upgrade Club
shareholder in the making
Offline
Founder, Axiom Upgrade Club
shareholder in the making
C
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,077
Likes: 7
Do LED projectors ever suffer from diminished brightness, or do they pretty much operate at the same level until they croak?

Re: high cost of anamorphic lens
CV #214409 07/04/08 10:34 PM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 504
N
Nick B Offline OP
aficionado
OP Offline
aficionado
N
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 504
I don't know of any LED projectors out right now. They are supposed to be coming though. I know that the first generation Samsung LED DLP rear projection tv had problems with unifomly lighting the screen. It was bright in the center and then dim as you radially move outward. I bet that they will fix this within the next couple generations though. Taking this into account it will probably be at least three or four years until LED front projectors are implemented well. I guess that I didn't answer your question did I. It would be a nice thing if they did have the same brightness until they burn out though.

- Nick

Re: high cost of anamorphic lens
Nick B #214412 07/04/08 11:48 PM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,077
Likes: 7
C
CV Offline
Founder, Axiom Upgrade Club
shareholder in the making
Offline
Founder, Axiom Upgrade Club
shareholder in the making
C
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,077
Likes: 7
I guess I'm waiting for front projectors featuring PhlatLight technology from Luminus Devices. Their website claims it is capable of uniform brightness over the entire LED surface. Here's hoping they can implement LED front projectors well in the next two years, as that's probably when I'll be too impatient to wait anymore. Ha ha.

Re: high cost of anamorphic lens
CV #214413 07/05/08 12:04 AM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,077
Likes: 7
C
CV Offline
Founder, Axiom Upgrade Club
shareholder in the making
Offline
Founder, Axiom Upgrade Club
shareholder in the making
C
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,077
Likes: 7
I'm also kind of interested in PhlatLight for general lighting purposes. I guess we'll see how that pans out. I almost want to invest in the company.

Re: high cost of anamorphic lens
michael_d #214414 07/05/08 12:16 AM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,859
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,859
 Originally Posted By: mdrew

Figure total screen area in Square Feet. A 1.69 110” diagonal screen has 36 sq ft (96"X54")/144=36. multiply that by the desired FL you are shooting for – (36 X 23) = 828 total lumens.

Figuring 50% bulb loss, you would shoot for a “rated” output of 1656 if you are using a screen with a gain of 1.0. If you had a gain of 3, you’d want a projector with 552 lumens.


So is it a better investment to get a projector that does more lumens, or a high gain screen to help out with a lower lumen count from a projector?

I think the rest of the thread answered the question...it appears the projector with the higher lumens is the better bet, which is what I would have guessed.

If I do go with a 110" screen, what would be an optimal seating distance for viewing 1080P? What about a 720P cable broadcast or even a 480P DVD?

Last edited by Zarak; 07/05/08 12:28 AM.
Re: high cost of anamorphic lens
Nick B #214448 07/05/08 03:06 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,444
Likes: 16
M
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
M
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,444
Likes: 16
Nick,

I like your idea using some generic material. I’d take that even one step further. Just paint the wall flat white (or just use a white pigmented prime coat because it is flat and very white which should give you a gain of .8 – 1.0) and then you will be able to determine FL, but you can play with screen size and physical location. I ended up moving my screen three different times up and down before I got it situated just right. You can go down to your local fabric store and pick up the cheapest black velvet or other fabric you can find, then just staple it up around the image size you want. Try that for a while, then zoom in or out some until you get the screen the exact size and location you want it. Then all you do is build or buy a screen that size, fill the staple holes with mud, touch up with more primer and then finish painting the wall the color you decided on and you won’t ever wonder…..

Curved screens are great when use an HE anamorphic lens, but not necessary. All HE lenses will exhibit pincushion and some level of CA when in the beam path. Typically, all you do is over scan or zoom the image out to where the far right / left sides of the image are up on the screen velvet and you never see it. But if you have a curved screen, this is not required. The extremist videophiles claim you have a more uniform picture with a curved screen. I can understand the rational of that opinion, but haven’t seen it first hand to comment. I do think a curved screen would make the movie a bit more immersive though. CA is strictly related to the quality of the optics that the lens has (which is also something to consider when buying a projector as the budget projectors use questionable optics).

I just saw this posted at AVS by a Planer rep. Very promising. The 8150 is sounding better and better every day. I think you should just buy one and tell me all about it… LOL

Quote:
Originally Posted by funlvr1965
Brian any idea when the next firmware release for the white clipping issue that some reviewers are finding? I spoke with someone over at Planar and he said that he was going to see Bob williams later that day and he would ask. Well he was nice enough to call back and tell me that he spoke to Bob and that at that time there didnt seem to be any definate time line for the new firmware. In all fairness the clipping issue I believe was on measurements and not really in real world viewing so Im wondering if that being the case if its not a priority at this point, any info on that and if the 8150 are still on backorder or are the units flowing out to dealers?. Thanks in advance
We are working on a SW update, and the validation is being completed as we speak - so assuming all is well, it should be out this month. It will include many updates, including the 'clipping' issue. You are correct that this issue would not be seen in real world applications, but we want to make it perfect non-real-world applications also...

-------------

All SW updates will be posted on the Planar web site for you to download, so if you get your projector now, you will get the update faster than waiting for it to show up already loaded in production.

We get PD8150's and PD8130's in weekly and they are selling out as fast as we get them in, but we are cranking up production to try and get ahead.
__________________
Brian Carskadon
Director of Product Management
Planar Systems, Home Theater Business Unit
Brands: Runco, Vidikron, Planar

Re: high cost of anamorphic lens
Zarak #214449 07/05/08 03:19 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,444
Likes: 16
M
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
M
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,444
Likes: 16
 Originally Posted By: Zarak


So is it a better investment to get a projector that does more lumens, or a high gain screen to help out with a lower lumen count from a projector?


Well, there’s two different thought processes with this.. 1) digital projector technology is changing rapidly now with HD material becoming main stream. If you like to upgrade a lot, you might want to just put your money towards a good screen. That’s what I did because I tend to buy A/V equipment like I do socks. 2) the other thought is buy as much projector as you can afford and just build yourself a screen or buy a mid level screen. You can find many screens under $1000 that work very well for most situations.

 Originally Posted By: Zarak


If I do go with a 110" screen, what would be an optimal seating distance for viewing 1080P? What about a 720P cable broadcast or even a 480P DVD?


Screen size is totally subjective. It’s all a personal choice. Do you like sitting in the front row or in the back? Only you can decide what is right for you. If you are worried about SDE, don’t worry about it with 1080P, you won’t see any unless you get within two to three feet of the image. Depending on the projector your buy and the video processor it has, or if you use an outboard VP, 720 and 480 can look almost as good as 1080i/1080P source material, or they might look like crap. You still shouldn’t worry about SDE with 1080P output though. You won’t see the pixels, just a big crappy image, or a good up-scaled image.

Re: high cost of anamorphic lens
Nick B #215245 07/14/08 07:25 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,955
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6,955
Deleted post.

I replied to a post at the end of the first page without noticing there were several more pages of replies to go.

Last edited by Murph; 07/14/08 07:29 PM. Reason: redundant

With great power comes Awesome irresponsibility.
Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,486
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 1,184 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4