Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 4 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Re: If QS8's were ceiling mounted...
grunt #249798 03/02/09 03:40 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,361
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,361
 Quote:
The reason I suggested moving the bookshelf is I was afraid it might end up that the best sounding speaker position is so close to it that it blocks access to the bookshelf.

To be a pain: it should be pointed out that you have an issue to deal with beyond symmetry. Left speaker's first reflection should hit diffusive bookshelf or void of entry way - good delay of reflection. The right speaker hits ultra reflective glass doors - very bad. So while the distance is very important, not sure it will matter as much when you consider a delayed reflection on the left and a hot reflection on the right. Need some heavy drapes on the sliding glass door to try and equal out the reflective properties of the first boundaries. In my room I have a similar situation, and fixing it proved highly beneficial. My fix is not permanent yet, but with temporary absorbers in place, the image is much better than the natural reflective state.

Sorry to further complicate, but you should end up with a pretty sweet sounding system so you might as well deal with all this BS at the front end - ounce of prevention and all the jazz.


Panny 3000 PJ, 118" Carada, Denon 3300, PS3, Axiom QS8, PSB 5T, B&W sub, levitating speaker wire
Re: If QS8's were ceiling mounted...
Zimm #249842 03/02/09 06:25 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,569
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,569
 Originally Posted By: Zimm

Sorry to further complicate, but you should end up with a pretty sweet sounding system so you might as well deal with all this BS at the front end - ounce of prevention and all the jazz

I was also looking at that big hunk of glass. As you know from my thread you helped me out on, I’m also looking to cover some glass but just not as bad since the glass in my room is much further back. But your right if we’re going to talk about room/speaker interactions might as well drag that big window into it because it is going to be an issue.


3M80 2M22 6QS8 2M2 1EP500 Sony BDP-S590 Panny-7000 Onkyo-3007 Carada-134 Xbox Buttkicker AS-EQ1
Re: Large great room. 7.1 speaker placement & dipole v
grunt #249865 03/02/09 08:19 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 562
davekro Offline OP
aficionado
OP Offline
aficionado
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 562
 Originally Posted By: grunt
This code used above is actually UBB Code which is a variation of HTML Code. Since you’ve used some of them already you have noticed that above the text window on the “Reply” screen many of the codes are selectable with icons. Even the Quotes are there. So you can just type or cut and paste your text into the window then highlight the text you want to quote and hit the “quote” icon.

P.S. Darn, he beat me again.

Dean,
Glad you showed me the long hand before pointing out the short cut. Good to understand (a bit of) what makes an icon do it's magic. \:\)


Dave

"In theory, practice and theory are the same. In practice they're not."
Re: If QS8's were ceiling mounted...
grunt #249869 03/02/09 08:26 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,361
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,361
It just struck me that the whole discussion of reflections and putting speakers in identical boundary setups is really just hypothetical in this case. The bounce off those books reacts nothing like the bounce off that glass. Not that it has to be exact, but those are almost polar extremes. The void after the books also adds to the dissimilarity as the second and third reflections will end up much delayed (or dead) as compared to the glass side. I have a similar opening void, but it is at the back of the room so not a big deal - actually helps my small room.


Panny 3000 PJ, 118" Carada, Denon 3300, PS3, Axiom QS8, PSB 5T, B&W sub, levitating speaker wire
Re: Large great room. 7.1 speaker placement & dipole v
JohnK #249879 03/02/09 08:58 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840
Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840
Likes: 13
Wow! what a novel. \:\)

Hey Dave, you sure have thought this out a lot more than I ever did. In fact, if I were to do it over again, I would take a little more time to think things out..

One thing you mention is your worry about blasting out your wife in the kitchen/dining area by having speakers along the rear wall. In my experience, there is not a lot of material (movies) that makes full use of the rear channels. Blu Ray may be different, I haven't taken that step yet.

I use Dolby PLIIx mode when watching movies, which takes the left/right material and extends/matrixs it to the rear channels which is tons better than 5.1, but still it does not "blast" you out as these are just background surround effects.

Maybe your talking about listening to multi channel music, or using one of the other DSP modes on a receiver for movie watching like 7-channel stereo mode?

For full house/room music listening it might be nice to have the speakers back there, but for movies I think it might be to FAR back and hard to hear, especially considering how far the left/right surrounds will be from the primary seat(s).

I'm not sure the surround under the counter will be the best, as it will be a lot lower than the left/right surrounds. I think the goal is to have them as close as possible to the same height for the best seamless experience.

For ceiling mounting, you could use something like Axiom's ceiling bracket, that would allow you to angle them downward. Or, find a way to hang them down/suspend them from the ceiling, they are pretty heavy. In either case, you could mount each Qs8 centered on each half of the ceiling about the same distance back as the left/right surrounds are from you.

How do you plan to run the wiring, do you have access to the ceiling locations/walls? Also, on the left surround, it might be to close to the cupboard and the back tweeter might be comprimised a bit. Can you move it forward more towards the door opening?

Randy


M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350
AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85


Re: Large great room. 7.1 speaker placement & dipole v
grunt #249909 03/02/09 09:51 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 562
davekro Offline OP
aficionado
OP Offline
aficionado
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 562
 Quote:
I’ve read that it’s best to have the front of the speakers about 3.5 feet from any vertical surface to prevent the reflected sounds from interfering with the timing cues your ears are receiving directly from the speakers. Mixed timing cues can blur the imaging of what you’re hearing. Some people who find this annoying but can’t move there speakers will use diffusers on the reflection points to break up the sound so it’s not reflected directly at the listener. Actually having the bookshelf there is better than having a bare wall since the odd shapes and soft texture of the books will act like a diffuser.

The main reason I suggested moving your front speakers out further is that I couldn’t tell from the picture that they are probably already far enough out. The reason I suggested moving the bookshelf is I was afraid it might end up that the best sounding speaker position is so close to it that it blocks access to the bookshelf. The reason I suggested moving your main speakers farther to the side of the TV was to try and widen the front soundstage to cover more of your seating area rather than be narrowly focused around the TV. Also sound reflects off the TV screen which can cause the problems discussed above as well as colour the sound. This often happen to center speakers who’s fronts are even with the TV screen and is usually remedied by moving them out in front a little bit. As for your main speakers a good starting place might be to move them away from the TV symmetrically on either side of it so that the L/H speaker is about half way between the TV and the bookshelf.


Dean,
1a) Very good info. OK, I mocked up your idea (leave TV room centered, space LF spkr mid way between shelf and TV). The TV is 2' from front wall. fronts and center used to be in line with that. I think I could live with the L & R fronts being forward of screen 1' (WAF unknown but prob. OK). If I were also to lear to be OK with the CENTER being 1' in front of screen, I would be able to use an M22! I'm not AS keen on that (yet). But if this positioning 'should' improve the sound stage noticeably, then I think I would be OK with it (knowing I'm getting 'much' improved SQ).

1b) (sorry for very lousy pic. My camera is wigged out and my wife took her iPhone to work... some nerve, eh. ;o)
With a mock up M80 (tall black image with white paper taped to top trying to aprox. M80 ht), and another mock up on Rt. side:
LF has 20" between shelf and TV. Front of spkr is 1' forward of screen, same distance from front wall as end of shelf. RF is 20" from TV too. Both LF & RF are 77" from the main room walls.
Note: On left main wall, 2 1/2' into room from front of LF, is the 5'W x 7'Tall, passage way down to front door. On Rt. main wall, verticle blinds extend 1 1/2' behind and 8 1/2' forward of the new forwaed front speaker line. If that influences placement of fronts, I do not know.


2a) Dean, so this 1' forward placement of front speaker line leaves:
- Backs of M80's 19" from front wall (20" from shelf & TV)
- Back of a potential M22 2" forward of center of shelf area. There is a tape deck that could either go on the upper or lower shelf if the port on M22 cared. Or if it was better, the tape deck could go away (don't recall last time I used it).
- IF a VP150 were chosen, it would either mount on the top shelf or on a stand forward of AV shelves.
2b) I'd love to hear more opinions on the degree of preference of an M22 vs. a VP150 center for my application.

 Quote:
I thought that nothing was of limits when brainstorming. ;\) now where’d I put that sledge hammer.


Doouh, I sit corrected. All is open for brainstorming... I just don't let my wife read over my shoulder for that kind of idea! ESPECIALLY if she likes it... then I have another project. \:\(

Big thanks to all for your great help here!

Last edited by davekro; 03/02/09 09:52 PM.

Dave

"In theory, practice and theory are the same. In practice they're not."
Re: If QS8's were ceiling mounted...
davekro #249911 03/02/09 09:54 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 562
davekro Offline OP
aficionado
OP Offline
aficionado
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 562
 Originally Posted By: davekro
So what tipping point of price and power makes one consider going separates?
1) If you want or think you may want at some point in the future, more than say 130 wpc (like Denon 3808 AVR)? A higher wpc power #?
Being a newbie to all this stuff, I cannot even conceive of a need for more that 130 wpc.

I'd don't have closet to convert to an AV stack closet. I can't imagine how many bucks you could soak into even a modest separates set up. Like I said, I'm green. ;o)


Sorry, this was posted on this thread in error...

Dave


Dave

"In theory, practice and theory are the same. In practice they're not."
Re: If QS8's were ceiling mounted...
grunt #249915 03/02/09 10:15 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 562
davekro Offline OP
aficionado
OP Offline
aficionado
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 562
 Quote:
At the end of the day I’m just being a perfectionist because I can. The VP150 is IMO as good a dedicated center speaker at blending with the mains it’s designed for as any other I’ve heard. And the vast majority of people would notice any difference especial the farther one sits from the speakers as that allows them to blend together better.


I am a perfectionist too, as it may show with the level of detail and pictures I post. AND I'll have you know, the diagram is darn tootin' to scale! (1/4" = 1' on the original) Who in their right (OCD) mind would do it any other way!!! Big LOL \:D

[quote]Assuming your picture is fairly to scale I would start by trying the single QS8 at the blue dot and the dual QS8s at the red dots. Here symmetry around the listening position is probably most important. And don’t worry about reflection with the QS8s as they are designed to take advantage of them to enhance the surround effects.





The QS8s are actually very easy speakers to place I only suggest that you experiment with their positioning because it sounds like you want to get the most out of your system and that’s the best way to do it.[/quote)

For your 'BLUE' 6.1 dot: I'll try both, but would your guess be mtd at end of counter at ear ht. -OR- mtd at ceiling peak (where it's distance back is moveable) might be better?

For your 'RED' 7.1 dots:
where you have them would make them approximately 11' apart, 4 1/4' behind list. pos., SBL aprx 4' from cabinets and SBR aprx. 6 1/4' from uncovered sliding glass door on rt. wall.

Tks,

Last edited by davekro; 03/02/09 10:16 PM.

Dave

"In theory, practice and theory are the same. In practice they're not."
Re: If QS8's were ceiling mounted...
Zimm #249920 03/02/09 10:42 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 562
davekro Offline OP
aficionado
OP Offline
aficionado
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 562
 Originally Posted By: Zimm
 Quote:
The reason I suggested moving the bookshelf is I was afraid it might end up that the best sounding speaker position is so close to it that it blocks access to the bookshelf.

To be a pain: it should be pointed out that you have an issue to deal with beyond symmetry. Left speaker's first reflection should hit diffusive bookshelf or void of entry way - good delay of reflection. The right speaker hits ultra reflective glass doors - very bad. So while the distance is very important, not sure it will matter as much when you consider a delayed reflection on the left and a hot reflection on the right. Need some heavy drapes on the sliding glass door to try and equal out the reflective properties of the first boundaries. In my room I have a similar situation, and fixing it proved highly beneficial. My fix is not permanent yet, but with temporary absorbers in place, the image is much better than the natural reflective state.

Sorry to further complicate, but you should end up with a pretty sweet sounding system so you might as well deal with all this BS at the front end - ounce of prevention and all the jazz.


Zimm, you are absolutely NOT being a pain!!! Most excellent factoring in. You guys have all this wealth of experience with all these variables. I am VERY interested in drilling down to all the details you guys are willing to share your experience with!

So that Rt. side sliding glass door will always have it's vinyl vertical blinds closed when movie watching. I understand a heavy curtain would best absorb (and not reflect) sound waves.
I have never been told how wide an angle sound emanates from the M80 spkr. fronts. 180 degr.? more? less?
You seem to say that sound from the LF, even if it hits say the last 6"-12" of the bookshelf (which actually has lots of framed photos and nick nacks, not books), then continues on into the open entry way (as they correctly would) is in effect non reflective?

Back to the Vinyl vertical blinds. Would they reflect less than the bare glass (I'd guess)? But is it significantly less reflective to be OK, or would planning to change to drapes be significantly better? For testing, I'd guess hanging a regular velux blanket over vert. blinds would help, but still not absorb like good drapes, correct? (WAF pretty high for that blanket idea, I'm sure. ;\) )

For light reduction in room, I did think I might add vertical blinds to match on the rear slider. I don't know how moving the front blinds to the back slider and installing a curtain up front would look?? IMO, the vertical blinds have a lighter, less heavy look for the room. But, hey, if we are talking a huge sound improvement... it's on the table. ;\)

Thanks


Dave

"In theory, practice and theory are the same. In practice they're not."
Re: If QS8's were ceiling mounted...
grunt #249921 03/02/09 10:46 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 562
davekro Offline OP
aficionado
OP Offline
aficionado
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 562
 Originally Posted By: grunt

I was also looking at that big hunk of glass. As you know from my thread you helped me out on, I’m also looking to cover some glass but just not as bad since the glass in my room is much further back. But your right if we’re going to talk about room/speaker interactions might as well drag that big window into it because it is going to be an issue.


OH, sure. Now I have ISSUES! I'd prefer to leave my issues out of this, and just stick to the audio discussion please! Thank you very much. ;\)

Last edited by davekro; 03/02/09 10:47 PM.

Dave

"In theory, practice and theory are the same. In practice they're not."
Page 4 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,479
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 947 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4