Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 6 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Re: Sound of Receivers
JohnK #289305 01/30/10 03:50 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
But stubborn disagreement can be a very effective rhetorical strategy!

Last edited by kcarlile; 01/30/10 03:51 AM.

I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
Re: Sound of Receivers
JohnK #289321 01/30/10 05:20 AM
H
htnut
Unregistered
htnut
Unregistered
H
 Originally Posted By: JohnK
Nut, a comment on your reply discussing the Stereo Review double-blind amplifier listening tests. There was an open listening session before the blind tests and it's amusing to read some of the rather extravagant language describing the differences they claimed to hear when they knew the identity of the units they were listening to, so this increased the interest of the tests. Of course, the identities were concealed during the blind tests and the sound differences disappeared when the name plates and price tags did.

These tests still stand unchallenged(unchallenged by solid evidence to the contrary, that is, not simply by stubborn disagreement).


Yes, I did notice that they had an open listening session first, but I felt that having the participants just knowing which amps were included in the blind tests would still influence them in what they think they hear.

I say send them in blind, don't tell them who or what they're listening to, don't even tell them we're comparing different amps, just tell them what to listen for (detail, brightness, warmth, imaging, soundstage, etc), and see what they say.

Re: Sound of Receivers
#289330 01/30/10 05:59 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
Of course knowing what they were listening to influenced what they expected to hear. That's the whole point.


-----------------------------------

Enjoy the music, not the equipment.


Re: Sound of Receivers
JohnK #289360 01/30/10 02:58 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,443
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,443
 Originally Posted By: JohnK
Of course knowing what they were listening to influenced what they expected to hear. That's the whole point.


As I have noted before, John, your signature speaks volumes...Rob


"A fanatic is someone who can't change his mind and won't change the subject" Churchill
Re: Sound of Receivers
medic8r #289377 01/30/10 04:16 PM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,463
Likes: 1
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,463
Likes: 1
 Originally Posted By: medic8r
It was always Sean's favorite. You don't know how hard I had to fight the urge to bring him back.

Oh, wait, just go check out the "Where Avatars go to die" thread over here.

Just scroll three blocks down from Dancin' Spiderman. If you get to Self-Facializing Cow, you've gone too far. (Ain't that the truth)


I made the mistake of clicking JP's link yesterday and just now snapped out of my Hypnohead induced trance. . .


Evil avatar. . .


***********
"Nothin' up my sleeve. . ." --Bullwinkle J. Moose
Re: Sound of Receivers
St_PatGuy #289458 01/31/10 03:55 AM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,789
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,789
I think it's great to dispell long held beliefs, such as you don't need $6000 dollars to buy a good 'sounding' amp. That's what made it so easy to purchase my Emotiva for $600 bucks, because I now know that 1 watt = 1 watt.

But one thing that may get lost in translation while reading all of this is that we should all go down to Radio Shack, pick up their cheapest 7.1 channel reciever, and think we're going to be ok. There is a difference in recievers, even if coloration isn't one of them.

My case and point, I've owned my Denon 4802 for about 8 years now. And ever since everything went the way of HDMI, I've been dying to upgrade to something with HDMI. But I've been confused about what I really needed, and what was just 'fluff'. So I got my hands on a Sherwood NewCastle 772 to test out it's HDMI features. The very 1st thing I noticed was how small the Sherwood was next to the mighty Denon. When I picked it up I thought perhaps it was a pre-pro... "How in the world can this thing be this light"?

When I moved the Denon to make way for the Sherwood it was two inches taller, 6 inches longer & weighed about 20 pounds more than the tiny (in comparison) Newcastle! It wasn't just a slight difference, it was like switching from a Ford Excursion to a Volkwagen Golf. I thought, "my God did they fill this thing with lead to make it hurricane proof"???

Ok so I knew from all the discussions on here that it wouldn't matter, it would still sound the same as my Denon. And as far as anything from half volume on down I would say this is correct. But when the volume goes up past 35 (the Sherwood goes from 0 to 70 on the volume scale where the Denon went from like -60 to +12) I could definately tell that something was missing. And that something was POWER!!! It first hit me when I accidentally sat on the remote control & it shot up to something near max, and it sounded like total SHIT!!! This poor Sherwood just does not have the juice it takes to keep the M80's happy, not by a long shot. And although the Denon is only rated to run 25 watts per channel more than the 772, let me just state for the record that the actual disparity is much greater than that.... MUCH! But even though the Denon commands the M80's with much more authority than the Sherwood could ever hope to, it still bows to the massive power reserves of the XPA-3. And keep in mind the Emotiva out weighs the Denon without any of that processing stuff to bog it down any. So does that mean pounds equals power? Not hardly. I would never go out shopping for a reciever with a scale under my right arm. But it did make me realize that those big, massive recievers/amps are that way for a reason.

Now not everyone will use the 300 watts of the Emotiva, hell I don't even use ALL of them. And yes I'll admit that for 98% of what I do, the Denon would suffice just fine. However I could not hit max volume with the Denon, it did start clipping a bit when I tried it before. Not nearly as garbled as it was when I accidentally blasted the Newcastle, but the Emotiva simply plays the M80's with complete authority all the way from -60 to +12 (with the Denon acting as a pre/pro... The Sherwood has no pre-outs, so I can't hook the Emotiva up while using it). I realize most of you have no interest in seeing +12 on the volume dial. I guess I just like having that peace of mind knowing if a buddy ever says, "say man how loud does this thing play", I can say, "well let me show you", & blow the roof off of the house for him.
I would not feel comfortable taking this Sherwood up past probably 55 for anyone. Most people have no clue what clipping is, or dynamic headroom, or THD or any of that good stuff. Not even if you sat there and tried to explain it to them. All they know is if you tell them you spent upwards of four grand on your home theater (while most of them probably thought their $150 dollar home theater in a box was 'expensive'), and then it starts breaking up when you turn it up too high... well they're going to think you're the biggest sucker to ever live.

Lol, hell I realize all that balogna is beneath the vast majority of you guys. But it does mean something to me. Enough to spend $600 bucks purchasing an amp that would drive my M80's to their full potential whether I use that potential very often or not. So no, there may not be any sound quality differences between the 100 watt per channel Sherwood Newcastle and the 125 watt per channel Denon paired with the 300 watt per channel Emotiva. But there is a major difference in how my speakers behave when I feed them all the power they ever thirst for.

Oh and one last thing... I played the Sherwood at the very peak of its performance level (where it was still playing fairly smooth, with minimal distortion), which was around 55 on the dial for about 6 minutes and then the reciever shut down completely due to the protection circuts kicking in. This is something I never experienced with the Denon..... EVER!


My Stuff :

M80's
QS8's
VP150
EP800
Denon 4802
Emotiva XPA-3
Samsung BD-P3600
Sharp 65 Inch Aquos LCD
Re: Sound of Receivers
Micah #289498 01/31/10 07:25 AM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 43
L
buff
Offline
buff
L
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 43
Yep, you still need to pay for features (power, inputs, channels, neons) and quality (fit, finish, use-ability, reliability).

Re: Sound of Receivers
Micah #289719 02/01/10 05:26 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,270
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,270
Hi Micah,

I would point out here (as I'm sure JohnK will) that any AV receiver run past its output limits will shut down, even if it is rated to be stable with 4 ohms.

You have a huge room, many times larger than the average, which puts a lot of stress on the relatively modest amplifiers built into a 7-channel AV receiver.

Used in a typical living room of about 2,100 cu. ft (about 19 x 13 x 8), which the Axiom listening room emulates, the Sherwood R772 or even the $300 stereo model will drive the M80s to very loud listening levels--louder than I like, without overheating or shutting down.

No, it won't begin to reach the extremely loud levels some of my colleagues prefer, +100 dB SPL, for which only separate power amplifiers are recommended, but used within its limits, the Sherwood Newcastles have robust sturdy amplifiers that have never had the problems with 4-ohm loads associated with some other brands, including some models of Emotiva.

Regards,
Alan Lofft


Alan Lofft,
Axiom Resident Expert (Retired)
Re: Sound of Receivers
alan #289728 02/01/10 05:57 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458
 Originally Posted By: alan

No, it won't begin to reach the extremely loud levels some of my colleagues prefer, +100 dB SPL,


Alan, when a new guy joins the "team", is he handed hearing protection? \:\)


::::::: No disrespect to Axiom, but my favorite woofer is my yellow lab :::::::
Re: Sound of Receivers
MarkSJohnson #289732 02/01/10 06:12 PM
H
htnut
Unregistered
htnut
Unregistered
H
If he doesn't already have hearing protection he wouldn't be on the team \:D

Page 6 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,486
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 1,386 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4