 Re: VP160 Concept Discussion
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379 Likes: 7
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379 Likes: 7 |
It depends on where you measure them. There seem to be two conventions - one measuring the outside of the speaker frame (5.25") and one measuring across the midpoint of the surround (4-ish). Axiom uses the first method IIRC.
M60ti, VP180, QS8, M2ti, EP500, PC-Plus 20-39
M5HP, M40ti, Sierra-1
LFR1100 active, ADA1500-4 and -8
|
|
|
Re: VP160 Concept Discussion
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379 Likes: 7
axiomite
|
|
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379 Likes: 7 |
I do kind of like dakkon's observation about simply making a VP100-config (MTM) but with the larger midwoofers. In an M50 cabinet ?
M60ti, VP180, QS8, M2ti, EP500, PC-Plus 20-39
M5HP, M40ti, Sierra-1
LFR1100 active, ADA1500-4 and -8
|
|
|
Re: VP160 Concept Discussion
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458
shareholder in the making
|
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,458 |
Oooooh, I asked that once when I was looking to replace a driver on a non-Axiom speaker.
Dammit. I can't remember which was "standard".
::::::: No disrespect to Axiom, but my favorite woofer is my yellow lab :::::::
|
|
|
Re: VP160 Concept Discussion
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379 Likes: 7
axiomite
|
|
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379 Likes: 7 |
I think measuring across the outside of the frame is a bit more common.
"The great thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from"
M60ti, VP180, QS8, M2ti, EP500, PC-Plus 20-39
M5HP, M40ti, Sierra-1
LFR1100 active, ADA1500-4 and -8
|
|
|
Re: VP160 Concept Discussion
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,863
connoisseur
|
|
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,863 |
with the 2 larger woofers you can get a much lower frequency with less drivers.
just a simple looking design.
|
|
|
Re: VP160 Concept Discussion
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
|
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044 |
It's 1/2" bigger, dude. I mean, that's something, but a whole new woofer design? Simply because Wilson uses it? Why not an 8" woofer, then?
I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
|
|
|
Re: VP160 Concept Discussion
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,789
connoisseur
|
|
connoisseur
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,789 |
...And the mids Axiom uses across the board (other than ABs and QS4s) are 5.25", not 4 1/4".... Whoops, my bad.
My Stuff :
M80's
QS8's
VP150
EP800
Denon 4802
Emotiva XPA-3
Samsung BD-P3600
Sharp 65 Inch Aquos LCD
|
|
|
Re: VP160 Concept Discussion
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,863
connoisseur
|
|
connoisseur
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,863 |
this is just my opinion, will it happen, probably not. They already have the 6 1/2's designed and in stock.. and without knowing the actual frequency response of both speakers it would be hard to tell any true benifit. i think with an 8" you would not get the midbass that either a 6 1/2 or a 7 would be able to provide. For now, i have a vp-180 on the way, and look forward to seeing what that has to offer.
|
|
|
Re: VP160 Concept Discussion
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488
axiomite
|
|
axiomite
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488 |
Right, John, an M50 Center. Oh, wait, they already have a VP150. Wow, that complicates things.  Jay, I guess I wasn't thinking very precisely. My perception is that the VP150 is inordinately long, but it is only 27.5. I was thinking of something "shorter" than that.
bibere usque ad hilaritatem
|
|
|
Re: VP160 Concept Discussion
|
|
htnut
Unregistered
|
|
htnut
Unregistered
|
It's 1/2" bigger, dude. I mean, that's something, but a whole new woofer design? Simply because Wilson uses it? Why not an 8" woofer, then? Wouldn't going bigger affect dispersion?
|
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,484
Members15,617
| |
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
|
0 members (),
434
guests, and
4
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
