|
|
 Re: M22 stand with smaller footprint?
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 79
old hand
|
OP
old hand
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 79 |
On a 24" stand I can see the top whenever I'm seated. Right now they're on barstools and I can see all the exposed top.
On a real stand of course it wouldn't look quite so bad, but it's enough that it wouldn't look right.
I can't imagine it takes too much skill to be handy enough with a grinder... it'd just take a grinder. That is not part of my tool collection. I wonder what they cost...
|
|
|
Re: M22 stand with smaller footprint?
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420
shareholder in the making
|
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,420 |
For what you want to do, the cheapest one out there would be sufficient, I would bet you could find one in the $20-$40 range easily.
Jason
M80 v2
VP160 v3
QS8 v2
PB13 Ultra
Denon 3808
Samsung 85" Q70
|
|
|
Re: M22 stand with smaller footprint?
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 79
old hand
|
|
OP
old hand
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 79 |
Followup: I ordered a 22" Sanus stand that was backordered a bit. Hasn't been delivered yet. The top will probably require a little bit of machining, but they were a good combination of attractive, heavy, semi-small platform, and cheap. And the guy who took the order on the phone lived 3 blocks from my house ten years ago (which was odd, given that he and his company are in Boston).
I will post photos when they arrive.
|
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,484
Members15,617
| |
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
|
0 members (),
1,172
guests, and
3
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|
|
