![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) ? about rear speakers
|
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 195 Likes: 5
veteran
|
OP
veteran
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 195 Likes: 5 |
Hi: I'm planning to upgrade my rear channel speakers which are mounted on my rear wall right above(2ft above) my couch(no other way to set it up! ![frown frown](/boards/images/graemlins/default/frown.gif) ....so given my limited options would a QS4/8 still work as they are designed to?? Or would I be better off with the on wall options??Thanks!!!
Paradigm 800F,Paradigm C600,Axiom QS8 v3,Paradigm DSP-3100 Sub,AVR Anthem MRX-740
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: ? about rear speakers
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,767
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,767 |
I can't see why they wouldn't work just fine.
The included on-wall powered mounts make installing quite easy...
TAM
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: ? about rear speakers
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,422
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,422 |
Axiom's QS speakers are very forgiving in their placement. I mean, there are some limits of course, but even being remotely close works well with them for a traditional 5.1 or 7.1 setup.
Farewell - June 4, 2020
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: ? about rear speakers
|
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 195 Likes: 5
veteran
|
OP
veteran
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 195 Likes: 5 |
Axiom's QS speakers are very forgiving in their placement. I mean, there are some limits of course, but even being remotely close works well with them for a traditional 5.1 or 7.1 setup. Thanks Nick!!! What about for Atmos? I see your on the Facebook home theater group!!!LOL...how are you liking the Anthem so far!!!
Paradigm 800F,Paradigm C600,Axiom QS8 v3,Paradigm DSP-3100 Sub,AVR Anthem MRX-740
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: ? about rear speakers
|
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 195 Likes: 5
veteran
|
OP
veteran
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 195 Likes: 5 |
I can't see why they wouldn't work just fine.
The included on-wall powered mounts make installing quite easy...
TAM Thanks Tam good to know!!
Paradigm 800F,Paradigm C600,Axiom QS8 v3,Paradigm DSP-3100 Sub,AVR Anthem MRX-740
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: ? about rear speakers
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,422
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,422 |
Well, I traded in my QS8 side and rear surrounds for monopole M3 speakers for Atmos. The other problem that you could be facing is that if you went with Atmos, you want the surround speakers closer to ear level (a little higher), so there will be compromises either way.
Farewell - June 4, 2020
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: ? about rear speakers
|
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 15
frequent flier
|
frequent flier
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 15 |
Well, I traded in my QS8 side and rear surrounds for monopole M3 speakers for Atmos. The other problem that you could be facing is that if you went with Atmos, you want the surround speakers closer to ear level (a little higher), so there will be compromises either way. Bumping a thread from the summer as I'm looking at also adding rear speakers to make a 9.2 setup (and the foundation for an eventual Atmos system). I keep looking at the M-3 on walls as I like the flat profile. Wondering if M-22s would be even better or just too much for surround duty? (Note: my other speakers are not Axiom and my current side surrounds are bipoles)
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: ? about rear speakers
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,928
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,928 |
Either would work. Keep in mind the M3's have a bump in freq at 100hz where the M22's are flatter if that's important to you. Obviously the M22's are a few inches taller than the M3's as well. Have you considered the M2's as another possibility?
Half of communication is listening. You can't listen with your mouth.
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: ? about rear speakers
|
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 15
frequent flier
|
frequent flier
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 15 |
Either would work. Keep in mind the M3's have a bump in freq at 100hz where the M22's are flatter if that's important to you. Obviously the M22's are a few inches taller than the M3's as well. Have you considered the M2's as another possibility? I guess I wondered whether M-2's would be too small?
|
|
|
![](/boards/images/icons/default/book.gif) Re: ? about rear speakers
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 185
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 185 |
[quote=EastCoast I guess I wondered whether M-2's would be too small? [/quote]
I have an M@ for a rear on a 6.1 system in a very large greatroom. When there is content in the rear channel, the M2 does a fine job producing the sound.
Whose avatar should I borrow next?
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,489
Members15,617
|
Most Online2,082 Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
1 members (rrlev),
1,163
guests, and
2
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|