Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 39 of 46 1 2 37 38 39 40 41 45 46
Re: Introducing the M5 and QS10
bridgman #425500 05/10/17 09:33 PM
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,357
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,357
Originally Posted By bridgman
Thanks Cam. Agree that the blue circles seem like the only good place for the speakers. With that separation though I would be thinking really hard about toeing them in a bit.

The in-wall speakers are fully enclosed so it should be possible to make an angled frame that sticks out from the wall a bit (maybe 1.5-2") on the outside edges, with a cutout for the speaker that would allow use of the existing clamps, but it seems like a lot of work when it would be easier to get the same result with on-wall speakers instead.

For on-wall you would just need to mount the power bracket on an angled block (30 seconds work with a miter saw) but you would want the blocks to be supported by a wall stud rather than wallboard. I *think* there would be studs available where you want them but not sure. There is always the old trick of using a thin piece of plywood to bridge between where you want to mount and where the stud is.

I guess the main downside of toed-in on-walls is that the outside edges of the speakers would end up almost 6" away from the wall, which would be OK on the left but which might interfere with access via one of the doors on the right hand side. I *think* it would be OK (in which case a floor or hinge-mounted door stop would be all you need) but not 100% sure.


Thanks again, dude. I thought the on-wall speakers were much thicker than the 4.75" stated on the product page. Your suggestion just might work. I'll do some measuring with a caregiver or my mom tonight or tomorrow, then report back to see what you think smile .

One thing I thought of is rather than having a door stop mounted as you suggested, would it be possible to hang the speaker on a thin piece of wood or metal that's hinged to the wall. That would allow for optimal toe-in adjustment, but then there's the weight of the speaker, and the chance of the door being opened before the speaker is put flush against the wall. Maybe Ian could comment on the hinged idea.

Cam


The only reasonable argument for owning a gun is to protect yourself from the police.
Re: Introducing the M5 and QS10
Ian #425501 05/10/17 10:03 PM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 7
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 7
I'm not Ian, but I really like the hinge idea.

You could also hinge a larger panel with a cut-out for an in-wall speaker and have it recess into an opening in the wallboard, but I suspect you are going to get better LF response from the on-walls anyways due to the larger enclosure volume.

Last edited by bridgman; 05/10/17 10:11 PM.

M60ti, VP180, QS8, M2ti, EP500, PC-Plus 20-39
M5HP, M40ti, Sierra-1
LFR1100 active, ADA1500-4 and -8
Re: Introducing the M5 and QS10
Ian #425505 05/11/17 03:01 AM
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,357
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,357
I just did some measuring, and the edge of the door is 3 1/2" from the wall, so on-walls would really interfere with the door. The other thing is that there's no way that each speaker can be placed at equal distance to left/right on my listening position. This is frustrating because I need something to work. If I could please get some other suggestions, I would greatly appreciate it.


The only reasonable argument for owning a gun is to protect yourself from the police.
Re: Introducing the M5 and QS10
Ian #425506 05/11/17 03:08 AM
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,281
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,281
can the doors open the opposite way. that is not a really good pic for me, it looks confusing are you using a special lens

Last edited by Socketman; 05/11/17 03:12 AM.

DOG is GOD spelled backwards.
What others think of me is none of my business.
M80 V3 MY GLOSS Cherry
Re: Introducing the M5 and QS10
Ian #425510 05/11/17 04:57 AM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 7
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 7
There's a good chance that the equal distance left/right issue can be handled with balance control. I haven't played with that for a while but my recollection was that it worked OK - will do some testing. If it works I might shift my speaker placement slightly off-center as well because that would let the speakers go in much more convenient locations.

Will think about door interference some more. From looking at the picture my first impression was that the door would be able to open at least 60-70 degrees even with a toed-in on-wall but I don't know how well that would work for access.

Another option IF the balance control option works OK would be to move the right speaker to the left - wouldn't necessarily have to be enough to clear the door, just enough that it didn't have to be toed in. That way only the left speaker would need to be angled.

Ian, if you see this could you comment on LF response of in-wall vs on-wall and bookshelf ? Right now the frequency response numbers in the specs seem the same for all three, but they look a bit like initial copy/paste numbers rather than actuals (I'm assuming LF would be impacted at least a bit by the smaller enclosures).

I'm working with the assumption that without a sub Cam would be happier with the sound from on-walls than in-walls but I don't really know how big the difference would be.


M60ti, VP180, QS8, M2ti, EP500, PC-Plus 20-39
M5HP, M40ti, Sierra-1
LFR1100 active, ADA1500-4 and -8
Re: Introducing the M5 and QS10
Ian #425511 05/11/17 08:11 AM
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,593
Likes: 1
A
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
A
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,593
Likes: 1
Hey Cam you have a unique install situation. I would recommend not installing in walls in your room. Since you spend a lot of time in bed, you could in theory build a system around a nearfield multichannel bedpost setup. This would require smaller speakers mounted around your frame integrated into the bed posts themselves. This way you are guaranteed the same result, wherever your bed is setup. Since your listening distance would be reduced, you can get away with much smaller and lower output enclosures. This would save money as well.

A 4 poster with taller posts at the top of the bed would be your path to modular atmos with a quality HTIB package. smile An inverted U shaped setup at the foot of the bed would allow an articulating TV mount and your speaker locations. If you were smart about it your costs would be similar to what you are thinking of doing with inwalls. Less hassle as well for tweaking later. smile

11/4" emt conduit bent at a local electrical company would be a cheap and sturdy post setup. We have the odd dad get us to bend up hockey posts. smile

Re: Introducing the M5 and QS10
bridgman #425513 05/11/17 01:14 PM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,387
Likes: 8
Ian Offline OP
President
connoisseur
OP Offline
President
connoisseur
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,387
Likes: 8
Hi Bridgman,

The LF of the on-wall and in-wall benefits from the boundary effect but that is not enough to equal the LF output from the bookshelf model.


Ian Colquhoun
President & Chief Engineer
Re: Introducing the M5 and QS10
AAAA #425517 05/11/17 01:52 PM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 7
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 7
Originally Posted By Serenity_Now
This would save money as well for a subwoofer.

Fixed that for you.

Originally Posted By Ian
The LF of the on-wall and in-wall benefits from the boundary effect

Thanks Ian. I'm going to pretend I knew that at one point but just forgot smile

Last edited by bridgman; 05/11/17 01:53 PM.

M60ti, VP180, QS8, M2ti, EP500, PC-Plus 20-39
M5HP, M40ti, Sierra-1
LFR1100 active, ADA1500-4 and -8
Re: Introducing the M5 and QS10
Ian #425531 05/12/17 07:45 AM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 7
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 7
I did a bit of testing to simulate Cam's wall-mount layout with my M5's - right hand speaker in fairly close & pointing straight ahead, left hand speaker "way over there" and toed in significantly.

Worked better than I expected (eg better than my results with speakers closer together but not toed in at all) although only maybe 8/10 for imaging compared to current location. I ended up getting best results by only partially adjusting the balance control and letting the soundscape spread further to the left... thought that would be odd but the result seemed pretty natural.

All that said I think Serenity_Now's idea of smaller speakers mounted more closely could work even better than anything we have discussed so far, although you probably would end up wanting a subwoofer to cover the lower notes.


M60ti, VP180, QS8, M2ti, EP500, PC-Plus 20-39
M5HP, M40ti, Sierra-1
LFR1100 active, ADA1500-4 and -8
Re: Introducing the M5 and QS10
Ian #425533 05/12/17 08:12 AM
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,593
Likes: 1
A
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
A
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,593
Likes: 1
The sub will be a tough one. Smaller speakers will mean a higher crossover point. This means more modes are affected and Cam's head is near a wall in bed. Dual opposing sidewall subs at mid bed might be a good compromise. Little guys like ep125 would work well.


Page 39 of 46 1 2 37 38 39 40 41 45 46

Moderated by  alan, Andrew, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,484
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 451 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4