|
|
 Re: SVS vs. VELODYNE
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 85
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 85 |
For over a year I owned both an SVS 16-46PC+ and a Velo HGS12II. I ran A/B tests, I ran them individually during critical test scenes in movies, and I ran them together. To my uneducated ears they sounded the same, which by the way was excellent! But running them together added a totally new sound dimension to movies that neither alone was able to achieve. Ultimately though, I sold the Velo on eBay for $1425 and purchased a 2nd 16-46PC+.
I realize these aren't the subs you're contemplating, but maybe there's something here that will help?
- Bill
|
|
|
Re: SVS vs. VELODYNE
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 24
hobbyist
|
|
OP
hobbyist
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 24 |
Yeah, that helps alot.
I'll probably just stick with the SVS. I just want to make sure it's quick enough for music, not just good for HT.
Anyways, I'll be upgrading from the dual subs my wife built when we were in college:) They have a much higher frequency range, which I don't like and they're not punchy enough.
-sbc
|
|
|
Re: SVS vs. VELODYNE
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 49
buff
|
|
buff
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 49 |
JOEY's PC Sound System:
Polk LSi7 (x4, mains and rears) and SVS 25-31PC+ (sub) 
|
|
|
Re: SVS vs. VELODYNE
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 608
aficionado
|
|
aficionado
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 608 |
youre wife got a sister???...ron
|
|
|
Re: SVS vs. VELODYNE
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 715
aficionado
|
|
aficionado
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 715 |
or 2!
jr
"What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence." C Hitchens
|
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,946
Posts442,492
Members15,617
| |
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
|
0 members (),
736
guests, and
3
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|
|
