Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 5 of 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Re: EP500 vs EP600
Canesfan27 #438558 10/04/20 03:55 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490
Likes: 116
M
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
M
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490
Likes: 116
It is a very nice receiver. Yet it is not designed to give reference level SPL in a 5625 sq. ft. room at listening distances of 15 to 20 feet away. However, that doesn't mean it won't work for you. I very seldom play at reference level.

It's a good way to start with your Paradigms or M100s.


House of the Rising Sone
Out in the mid or far field
Dedicated mid-woofers are over-rated
Re: EP500 vs EP600
Canesfan27 #438561 10/04/20 04:33 PM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 656
Likes: 3
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 656
Likes: 3
Try the Denon I'm sure most of their AVRs at that level have pre-out. {Above their 3000 series} You may find it gets really hot. To which you could easily add more power later.

Re: EP500 vs EP600
Canesfan27 #438570 10/05/20 02:26 AM
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 470
Likes: 11
devotee
Offline
devotee
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 470
Likes: 11
Is there any benefit going with a pre-amp and an axiom amp vs going with the traditional receiver with pre-amp outs and an Axiom amp?

Last edited by Rebulx; 10/05/20 02:27 AM.

Lots of speakers from many
manufactures...mostly Axiom
Re: EP500 vs EP600
Canesfan27 #438577 10/05/20 05:10 AM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,897
Likes: 101
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,897
Likes: 101
In general having separate boxes isolates the preamp from the power amp. This keep the noise down and the supply rails cleaner . Having the power amp in a separate box reduces heat In the preamp which can effect component values and component life. It also provides room for more circuitry ...i.e. more inputs, outputs, channels and other fancy stuff.

A separate power amp give the designer space to provIde bigger power supplies, room to dissipate heat and of course more channels. Typically separate amp provide enough power to drive all channels at once.

Most receivers are built for a price and are limited by space which usually results in limited power. Because every thing is in the same box it’s harder to make the specs you can get in a prepro.

Receivers with a full complement of preouts are usually higher end products and running an amp to handle the all the channels would sound no different then the using a prepro IMO. If you use some of the receivers channels for say the surrounds you will probable be fine as long the rated power per channel Is not exceeded.

Re: EP500 vs EP600
Canesfan27 #438578 10/05/20 05:50 AM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,077
Likes: 7
C
CV Offline
Founder, Axiom Upgrade Club
shareholder in the making
Offline
Founder, Axiom Upgrade Club
shareholder in the making
C
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,077
Likes: 7
The main thing I dislike about pre-pros is they usually cost two or three times more than high-end receivers, even without the built-in amp. I still want one, but it's not really a value proposition. My plan is to get the new Anthem, whenever that ends up coming out. I want to know it can handle all of the HDMI 2.1 features to give it the longest life possible. It's a hard path for me to recommend to anyone except for extreme enthusiasts who need targets to shoot wads of money at.

Re: EP500 vs EP600
Canesfan27 #438579 10/05/20 12:34 PM
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 572
Likes: 24
C
aficionado
OP Offline
aficionado
C
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 572
Likes: 24
Does it make any difference if running the 180 with actives that the 180 would be on a amp with the surrounds? Most of what I’ve read suggests running the center and towers on the same amp.


LFR1100
VP180HP
EP600
M3 In Ceiling x 4
M5OW
M2 - Atmos rears
ADA1500.5
M3 Outdoor Speakers
ADA 1000.8
Re: EP500 vs EP600
Canesfan27 #438580 10/05/20 01:56 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490
Likes: 116
M
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
M
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490
Likes: 116
Each active speaker needs its own 5-channel amp. Do not mix amps between the two sides. The ADA-1250 and 1500 are quieter than the 1000 (see specs) so use one of those.

Do not put any other speakers on the amps that feed the actives.


House of the Rising Sone
Out in the mid or far field
Dedicated mid-woofers are over-rated
Re: EP500 vs EP600
Rebulx #438582 10/05/20 02:12 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490
Likes: 116
M
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
M
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490
Likes: 116
Originally Posted by Rebulx
Is there any benefit going with a pre-amp and an axiom amp vs going with the traditional receiver with pre-amp outs and an Axiom amp?

It's about THD+N, S/N and your environment. It does no good to pay top dollar for a pre/pro that is dead quiet only to have it drowned out by ambient noise.

It's also about the best EQ software. Audyssey XT32 is very good but it can't compete with Dirac Live. The EQ implementation is also important but you have to dig hard into the manuals to understand the configurable parameters available to you.

Finally, it's a lifestyle choice. For many, going pre/pro makes them feel better even though there may be no difference in measurable performance between their pre/pro and a receiver.


House of the Rising Sone
Out in the mid or far field
Dedicated mid-woofers are over-rated
Re: EP500 vs EP600
CV #438585 10/05/20 03:48 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,897
Likes: 101
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,897
Likes: 101
Originally Posted by CV
The main thing I dislike about pre-pros is they usually cost two or three times more than high-end receivers
It's a different market. What's interesting is that prepros do not necessarily give you better numbers especially if you take real world measurements vs manufacture numbers into account. Even if they did, in most cases you could not hear the difference.

I bought the AV8805 for the HT not for the numbers, fancy A/Ds and hyped circuitry but to get 7.4.6 Atmos. For the upstairs I bought a receiver with pre-outs as I only needed 5.1 which is set up using QS10s for surrounds as the room did not lend it self to Atmos.

Re: EP500 vs EP600
Canesfan27 #438590 10/05/20 09:52 PM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 656
Likes: 3
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 656
Likes: 3
Mojo has a very good point though in theory all properly built AVR/Pre should have enough of a dark background to be sufficient with a good. AMP. The main Pro I continuously run into is heat dissipation for why most choose pre/pro over AVR with pre outs. As an AVR will still get quite hot even with it's AMPs being idle.

The Axiom ADA's are fantastic. I've had my ADA1250x3 for a few years. No problem noise aside from ground loops with anything I've hooked it up too. {Integra/Anthem}

For my buildings wiring I ended up with a large Monster power brick with all cable T.V./Internet and system going to it. Plus the addition of cheap but really well shielded !0 AWG power cables from WAudio {Amazon}. For AVR/ADA lowered my noise floor dramatically.

Page 5 of 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,479
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 985 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4