Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Re: M2 vs M3 for Surrounds
Rebulx #438535 10/02/20 05:12 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490
Likes: 116
M
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
M
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490
Likes: 116
Rebulx, more pics please. LOL!


House of the Rising Sone
Out in the mid or far field
Dedicated mid-woofers are over-rated
Re: M2 vs M3 for Surrounds
Rebulx #438536 10/02/20 05:40 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,900
Likes: 101
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,900
Likes: 101
The M3ow's are quite good. The M3c's I would avoid unless you need them for aesthetics ... they are a big compromise ... I would recommend M3ow for your ceiling speakers if the aesthetics work.

My take on the M3c sound:
I have the in-ceiling installed in a few places. One of the problems I found was that they are a lot better in small spaces then large ones. In a medium-large space in which an M3 or M3 on-wall could do a reasonable job, the M3c's sound thin. The ones in much smaller rooms (like my master bathroom) sound good but nowhere as good as M3/M2 or anything else Axiom. Walking from the bath to the master playing M22s (with out sub) is a huge constant in sound (for the better).

Re: M2 vs M3 for Surrounds
Rebulx #438541 10/03/20 05:36 AM
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 470
Likes: 11
Rebulx Offline OP
devotee
OP Offline
devotee
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 470
Likes: 11
Do you have pics Michael?


Lots of speakers from many
manufactures...mostly Axiom
Re: M2 vs M3 for Surrounds
Rebulx #438545 10/03/20 03:48 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490
Likes: 116
M
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
M
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490
Likes: 116
Michael, please take pic-posting lessons from Rebulx. smile


House of the Rising Sone
Out in the mid or far field
Dedicated mid-woofers are over-rated
1 member likes this: Rebulx
Re: M2 vs M3 for Surrounds
Rebulx #438546 10/04/20 12:14 AM
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 317
Likes: 12
C
devotee
Offline
devotee
C
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 317
Likes: 12
The M2s are more neutral than the M3s, so I'd say it depends on what you fronts are. I see M22's in your signature, if that's you L/R I'd go with the M2. If you're using the M5 up from, then probably the M3s. (Full disclosure, I have M5s with M2s, but that's because I had M22s up front until I swapped in the M5s.)

Re: M2 vs M3 for Surrounds
Rebulx #438555 10/04/20 03:23 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490
Likes: 116
M
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
M
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,490
Likes: 116
The M2s give improved clarity (detail) and dispersion at mid-range and lower high frequencies compared to the M3s. You have to cross them over at 80Hz if you're going to play loud otherwise the bass will distort. However, I would not call the distortion objectionable and it may even be considered pleasant.

The M3s are definitely warmer-sounding. I like both in their own way. I have the M2OW in the living room for stereo. I don't have a cross-over on my 2-channel receiver so the M2OW bass distorts just enough to make them warmer.

The M5s are like M2s with bass.


House of the Rising Sone
Out in the mid or far field
Dedicated mid-woofers are over-rated
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,486
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 1,146 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4