Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: M60 v M80 for HT only
#63171 10/04/04 12:02 AM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 31
rook Offline OP
enthusiast
OP Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 31
Sounds like Alan only recommends HK and Denon receivers if you're pushing the 80s. How come the Denon puts out so many more watts per channel than the HK in the same price range?

Re: M60 v M80 for HT only
#63172 10/04/04 12:09 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,833
W
Wid Offline
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
W
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,833
That I have no answer for.I have the M80's in a stereo set up and use a seperate amp,preamp for them.Whatever the reciever you choose if the speakers are going to be M80's the reciever must be able to handle a 4 ohm load.


Rick


"A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity." Sigmund Freud

Re: M60 v M80 for HT only
#63173 10/04/04 01:00 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 521
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 521
I wouldn't say the Denon's put out that much more power per dollar. Remember, HK (like NAD) gives very accurate ratings. If it says 55 watts X6 then you will be able to get 55 continous watts to each channel. While I believe Denon is more honest with their power ratings than say Onkyo or Sony, I doubt if my Denon which is rated at 6 X 90 watts actually puts out 90 continous watts to all 6 channels. I'd guess between 70 and 80 watts if tested.

Re: M60 v M80 for HT only
#63174 10/04/04 01:37 AM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 7
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 7
>>OK, but would I ever be able to tell the difference between the 80s + the EP 600 and the 60s + 350 if I'm watching a movie in a 27X13 room?

Seems like spending extra money on a sub will get you more HT happiness than spending the same amount of money going from M60s to M80s. Besides, we want someone to report on those new big-ass Axiom subs

Last edited by bridgman; 10/04/04 01:38 AM.

M60ti, VP180, QS8, M2ti, EP500, PC-Plus 20-39
M5HP, M40ti, Sierra-1
LFR1100 active, ADA1500-4 and -8
Re: M60 v M80 for HT only
#63175 10/04/04 02:25 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
Rook, welcome, and I'll comment on your power rating question. The Denon doesn't necessarily put out more watts then the HK; the ratings are based on different standards. The Denon is with two channels driven simultaneously at full power for at least five minutes, the HK is with all channels driven simultaneously at full power for at least five minutes(not a very realistic situation in home use). Both ratings are accurate and actually a little conservative, as is the case with other manufacturers as well. Measured on the same basis the Denon and HK figures would be quite similar and small power differences are of almost no significance anyway.

There's sometimes a misconception that the FTC reg requires that all channels be driven simultaneously for the rating which all receiver/amps sold in the U.S. have to meet. As I've pointed out previously the FTC only requires that all "associated" channels be driven simultaneously. As was the case in the early 1970s when the reg was being formulated, "associated" is considered as being two channels, not all, and the manufacturers who rate their products on that basis are in compliance with the reg.


-----------------------------------

Enjoy the music, not the equipment.


Re: M60 v M80 for HT only
#63176 10/04/04 02:33 AM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 31
rook Offline OP
enthusiast
OP Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 31
Thanks for the info. I figured there was a good reason for the variance in watts per channel.

Many people on here (and the resident expert) suggest you can simply ignore the warnings that say "8 ohm only" on certain receivers. In doing research for the past couple of weeks, I haven't even seen a single receiver rated at 4 ohms. Is that because I'm not looking at any that cost more than $1500?

Re: M60 v M80 for HT only
#63177 10/04/04 04:09 AM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 425
devotee
Offline
devotee
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 425
Looking at your posts and what you are looking for, you may want to involve your wife (if you have one) with this purchase. I think that a lot of us on this board have run into the, "what the heck did you bring home" questions and to tell you the truth the subs usually get the most questions. The M600 that people are telling you about is HUGE and in your room, it will stand out. I have read some about the M600 but if it were me I would lean towards an SVS or an HSU unit. I know that I may catch crap for this one but how many reviews have we seen out there on the M600? It does sound great but because of the footprint, and the lack of reviews I would wait a little bit on that one. My room is close to yours and the M60's do a great job with HT. I have not heard the M80's but before you buy anything you may want to audition them both at someones place.

Good Luck!

Re: M60 v M80 for HT only
#63178 10/04/04 04:33 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,951
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,951
It probably would be wise to wait for some reviews of the EP600, but since it isn't even available yet it doesn't matter.

Re: M60 v M80 for HT only
#63179 10/04/04 04:41 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488
Likes: 1
T
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
T
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488
Likes: 1
Mark's right - there are few reviews on the new Axiom subs because they are available to the public via pre-sale only at this time.

I noticed that, while it has the Axiom "wedge" shape, the EP600 is virtually the same size as a SVS 16-46PCi. I mean, it's big, but it's not unprecedented or anything. And it's a heck of a lot better looking than the big, black, sock-wrapped cylinder, IMO.


bibere usque ad hilaritatem
Re: M60 v M80 for HT only
#63180 10/04/04 05:12 PM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 324
devotee
Offline
devotee
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 324
Either the 60's or 80's will suit you fine...

I've got M60's, VP150, and QS8's, and although my room isn't as big as yours, I assume you'll be fine. Sub is where it's at though. I have a SVS PB2-Plus...and let me tell you, that sub is disgustingly overkill for my room, I have it at just about half gain...and it's not even trying... it'd be fine in a room as big as yours, probably even bigger .

Depending on how much you want to crank out (i.e do you want it to shake your viewers kidney's? Then a solid receiver and/or seperates would be your bet.

I own a Denon 3805, and it can thump the room really easy, now if I go up to ear bleeding levels (0db in my case) then the protection circuit on my receiver comes on Either it's to hot, or not enough continuous power, I'd say a bit of both probably. Also that was in a situation that I was cranking it way to high for comfortable listening

Whatever you choose, have fun!

- D


"Big John is my Idol...or is it that other way around? Let's ask Ray!"
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,984
Posts442,691
Members15,643
Most Online2,699
Aug 8th, 2024
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,849
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 595 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4