Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Panamax vs. Tripplite vs. Monster
#64493 10/15/04 03:59 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 56
buff
OP Offline
buff
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 56
I guess I just want opinions on which will be better for line conditioning, filtering, and surge protection. I get music feedback right now and lots of hiss....im upgrading to the Pioneer 1014 and Axiom 60ti, VP150 and QS8s today or Monday


Pioneer VSX-1014TX-k Denon 1910 M60ti VP150 QS8 Definitive Tech PF15tl
Re: Panamax vs. Tripplite vs. Monster
#64494 10/15/04 04:25 PM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 791
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 791
If I had to do it again I would go with Triplite. Triplite is a lot cheaper and works just as good as the ones you listed. I have a Panamax 5300 and it's built like a tank and I do like it. The Brick Wall products are supposed to be real good too and don't use MOV's.


M80's VP150 QS8's Earthquake SuperNova MKV-15
Integra DTR-7.4 Outlaw 755 Outlaw M200's Outlaw ICBM
Re: Panamax vs. Tripplite vs. Monster
#64495 10/15/04 04:27 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 284
local
Offline
local
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 284
Your post makes pretty hard to figure out what you are asking. I recomend setting up your new system before buying anything. See if you still have issues, which is hard to comment on because your question is so non-specific.

I have a Panamax 4300 which helps clean up broadcast tv and FM reception(antenna filter) in a remote location with weak signals. Tripplite is recomended as affordable professional grade surge protection by some pros. In my understanding the whole line conditioning issue is largely dismissed by experts in most circumstances.

If you have particular circumstances that would create problems I suggest you spell them out. If you expect some kind of audio magic in general through line conditioning I think you are about to waste your money.


Mark
Re: Panamax vs. Tripplite vs. Monster
#64496 10/15/04 04:34 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 56
buff
OP Offline
buff
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 56
No, i dont expect magic...i expect some of the hiss to dimimish and for the music to stop bleeding over into my TV/computer speakers. Nothing like hispanic music playing underneath Game 2 of Houston/St Louis. I also expect better protection than my current Monster strip which is 4 years old. OH, and the Brick Wall looks good just doesnt have cable filtering....


Pioneer VSX-1014TX-k Denon 1910 M60ti VP150 QS8 Definitive Tech PF15tl
Re: Panamax vs. Tripplite vs. Monster
#64497 10/15/04 05:54 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,602
B
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
B
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,602
In reply to:

I guess I just want opinions on which will be better for line conditioning, filtering, and surge protection. I get music feedback right now and lots of hiss....im upgrading to the Pioneer 1014 and Axiom 60ti, VP150 and QS8s today or Monday



Music feedback?

Feedback involves a mic or pickup continually picking up and folding back the same signal over and over.

If you have problems with shielding that you're broadcasting RF signals into other speakers, then address that concern.

As for surge protection/line filters/conditioners, we had about a week long discussion on metal oxide varistors (MOVs) et al last time you asked about this all. Link Here.

Bren R.

Re: Panamax vs. Tripplite vs. Monster
#64498 10/15/04 07:38 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
I've had very bad experiences with Tripplite computer cables (not made to spec, don't work at all, crash the computer, etc...) so I'm a bit leery of them.

However, I wouldn't pay for a "music" or "AV" line conditioner either. Have a look at APC.


I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
Re: Panamax vs. Tripplite vs. Monster
#64499 10/15/04 08:07 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 56
buff
OP Offline
buff
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 56
I think Bren likes to bash me....maybe I didnt make it clear enough. I put the three brand names up for people to give me their opinion of them....and then some one asked why I was asking. So, I had to explain why....the hiss and the music bleed. Let me state that the music bleed into my TV speakers and computer speakers occurs in two different rooms. My receiver does not pick up this noise. My receiver sits next to my TV. I use either AR (subwoofer coax) or Monster cables for all my connections. But, Ill take the advice and rehook all of it up with the new components and move some items around...probably with a Panamax 5100


Pioneer VSX-1014TX-k Denon 1910 M60ti VP150 QS8 Definitive Tech PF15tl
Re: Panamax vs. Tripplite vs. Monster
#64500 10/15/04 08:12 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
What's the source of the music? Is it playing through some other system in your house? Is it a radio station? Is it your neighbors?


I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
Re: Panamax vs. Tripplite vs. Monster
#64501 10/15/04 08:15 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 56
buff
OP Offline
buff
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 56
You know, i havent been able to pinpoint it. Its a spanish music that I believe is a radio station. Since I dont listen to that type of music....I think it might traveling thru the power lines in the building???


Pioneer VSX-1014TX-k Denon 1910 M60ti VP150 QS8 Definitive Tech PF15tl
Re: Panamax vs. Tripplite vs. Monster
#64502 10/15/04 08:18 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
shareholder in the making
Offline
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,044
I doubt it... I imagine (could be wrong here) that it's a radio signal that's being picked up by the speaker cables or power cables and amplified by your computer's built in speakers. Like I said, I could be wrong... hmm. that doesn't explain the TV, though.


I am the Doctor, and THIS... is my SPOON!
Re: Panamax vs. Tripplite vs. Monster
#64503 10/15/04 08:47 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,602
B
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
B
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,602
All I'm saying is that if your tire is flat, don't look under the hood for why the car won't go.

It's easy to tell yourself that this will solve your problem, but you have two of them.

One, you want to protect your equipment. Not a bad idea - surge protector for that.

Besides that, you have equipment in your home that is acting as an antenna which is picking up the Mexican radio station/RF broadcast. It would be very nice if Panamax made a "get rid of the RF interference in my house" box you could plug things into, but... that's kind of like asking for a pill to fix any malady.

This is one of those "determine the root of the problem and fix it" questions, not a "which whiz-bang brand name gadget can I buy?" question. The benefit of having a problem isn't always the rationalization for a shopping trip.

Bren R.

Re: Panamax vs. Tripplite vs. Monster
#64504 10/15/04 09:08 PM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 282
local
Offline
local
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 282
Tleigh, How do you like your earthquake mark-5 15" sub???


Sunfire amps & processor Sammy 50" Crown amp 2-SVS SS Maple Ultras, Axiom 60s,22s,150cc, QS8s
Re: Panamax vs. Tripplite vs. Monster
#64505 10/15/04 09:12 PM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 791
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 791
I love it. The thing is a monster.
The bass is actually very accurate considering the size and it will go very low. I want a second one but I'm afraid that it will be overkill.



M80's VP150 QS8's Earthquake SuperNova MKV-15
Integra DTR-7.4 Outlaw 755 Outlaw M200's Outlaw ICBM
Re: Panamax vs. Tripplite vs. Monster
#64506 10/17/04 02:49 AM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 324
devotee
Offline
devotee
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 324
Monster: Works Good, Looks the Best, Price markup
Adcom: Works Good, Looks alright, not as feature filled
Triplite: Works Good, Looks like ass.

similar applies to panamax... They all work the same, some have more features then others do, and some you won't be afraid to have in your AV stand, others would make baby jesus cry.

- D


"Big John is my Idol...or is it that other way around? Let's ask Ray!"
Re: Panamax vs. Tripplite vs. Monster
#64507 10/17/04 03:45 AM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 66
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 66
I have to agree with Bren here but then I think all line conditioners are a bunch of huey.
However if it looks good and ya have the money to blow go for it.
Ever hear of fillings or bracies picking up radio signals? It's the same thing...I'm bettin you have a bunch of wires crossing each other.

leaf

Re: Panamax vs. Tripplite vs. Monster
#64508 10/17/04 02:01 PM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 791
aficionado
Offline
aficionado
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 791
Personally, I'm not afraid of how it looks. I just want it to perform well. I agree Triplite is butt ugly however it is the least expensive. I do like the look of Panamax the front panel is anodized brushed aluminum and the build quality is exceptional.


As far as getting rid of RF (Mexican music), that’s a difficult one. We had a similar problem with a phone system that we installed in this guy’s house. Most equipment made must pass RF signal and not block it. I think the FCC regulations made it mandatory if I remember correctly. We had to use shielded cables and an isolated ground for the power. The good thing is that it worked. If I had the problem with my audio equipment I would work on it in steps like I had to a few years ago, somebody in my neighborhood had an overpowered HAM system that was interfering with my home audio. Needless to say I couldn't locate the source of the offender so I had to take different steps to fix it. First, I purchased a very heavy speaker wire (for testing) that had a very thick jacket I had to disconnect all speakers except one. I also removed all but one source like DVD, Cable box and ETC. I cleaned up all of the cables from the rack to eliminate an antenna. I also removed all gear that wasn't being used during this test. Still no go. I rerouted the test speaker in the crawl space instead of the attic. Finally! I’m making progress. So I rerun the rest of the speaker cable one at a time and continue testing until all of the speaker wire is completely installed without picking up RF. Then I installed one source at a time and found the problem again! The cheapo Apex DVD player allowed the signal to pass into the system but not as bad as before, so I tried using a Tos-Cable instead of a coax cable. That worked!
My approach to the problem (a quest) was systematic. Before buying a bunch of stuff I tried stuff that made sense to me first. If I had disconnected everything connected to the receiver and plugged in headphones and still had a problem then I would have looked at the electrical.

I hope this make sense. I’m trying not to babble here and I’m not completely awake yet. I need my coffee

Regards,

Tom



Last edited by tleigh; 10/17/04 02:42 PM.

M80's VP150 QS8's Earthquake SuperNova MKV-15
Integra DTR-7.4 Outlaw 755 Outlaw M200's Outlaw ICBM
Re: Panamax vs. Tripplite vs. Monster
#64509 10/17/04 03:38 PM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 7
axiomite
Offline
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 7
In case this helps, in Toronto all the Mexican music and spanish speaking RF interference comes from the CB frequencies (~27 MHz). For some reason CB seems to have caught on as the "alternate telephone system" around here, and sometimes you even get music across the higher CB channels. No interference on the emergency channels yet but they do like to broadcast on "the jeep channel" (4).

10-4 amigos !


M60ti, VP180, QS8, M2ti, EP500, PC-Plus 20-39
M5HP, M40ti, Sierra-1
LFR1100 active, ADA1500-4 and -8
Re: Panamax vs. Tripplite vs. Monster
#64510 10/18/04 06:43 PM
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,041
connoisseur
Offline
connoisseur
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,041
My cheap computer speakers used to pickup radio. When I upgraded to a higher model I did not have that issue.

I have the Tripplite LCR2400 and it looks pretty good.
http://www.spaceloft.com/h30/mini-IMG_1966.htm




Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  alan, Amie, Andrew, axiomadmin, Brent, Debbie, Ian, Jc 

Link Copied to Clipboard

Need Help Graphic

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,489
Members15,617
Most Online2,082
Jan 22nd, 2020
Top Posters
Ken.C 18,044
pmbuko 16,441
SirQuack 13,840
CV 12,077
MarkSJohnson 11,458
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 1,161 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newsletter Signup
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4