Speaker terminology
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 325
devotee
|
OP
devotee
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 325 |
Are the terms "brightness" and a speaker that is "forward sounding" both used to describe the same thing? I just see both terms used alot and was wondering if they mean the same or are considered different descriptions.
|
|
|
Re: Speaker terminology
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,331
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,331 |
Opening a can of worms here, only because these terms, related to speakers, probably have different meanings to different people. Here is MY interpretation (and ONLY my interpretation) of both of them. I'm sure others will share theirs.
BRIGHT - Though my Webster's defines the word as " clear or brilliant in color or sound;vivid or intense," which seems a positive quality, I think it has become a slightly pejorative term implying a harsh, or piercing quality to the treble response of a given speaker. In other words, it ain't a good thing.
FORWARD - My Webster's first definition says " at, toward, or of the front, or forepart. When the term is applied to a speaker, I've taken to interpreting this to mean the sound-stage created by the speaker seems slightly in front of the speakers; close to you, as opposed to a speaker which makes you feel the sound-stage is recessed or behind the speakers a little.
In my mind (and ONLY in my mind) the two can be slightly linked, in that bright speakers TEND to be forward, and vice versa. Though, the presence of one characteristic does NOT necessitate the presence of the other.
ONLY my interpretations.
Jack
"People generally quarrel because they cannot argue." - G. K. Chesterton
|
|
|
Re: Speaker terminology
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840 Likes: 13
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,840 Likes: 13 |
Here is a good article from Alan at Axiom on this topic. Worms, Worms, Worms, lets go fishing....
http://www.axiomaudio.com/archives/sound.html
M80s VP180 4xM22ow 4xM3ic EP600 2xEP350 AnthemAVM60 Outlaw7700 EmoA500 Epson5040UB FluanceRT85
|
|
|
Re: Speaker terminology
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,270
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,270 |
Ajax,
Excellent description of those terms. And I'd agree that "bright" often has a certain pejorative edge. The opposite of a "bright" speaker (in a positive sense) would be a speaker that is dull or muffled and lacking in detail, especially midrange detail and clarity. I think "clear" and "detailed" perhaps convey the idea of sound that has plenty of clarity without harshness.
And thanks, SirQuack, for the link to my article.
Regards,
Alan Lofft, Axiom Resident Expert (Retired)
|
|
|
Re: Speaker terminology
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,331
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,331 |
Thank you, Alan. I was relieved to find my interpretation of "forward" was similar to yours. Kept me from sounding like a duffuss. (NO CRACKS YOU GUYS!)
Jack
"People generally quarrel because they cannot argue." - G. K. Chesterton
|
|
|
Re: Speaker terminology
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,488 |
No free ride, Jack.
That's d-o-o-f-u-s. Unless you're talking about Ray; then, it's d-u-f-f-e-r.
bibere usque ad hilaritatem
|
|
|
Re: Speaker terminology
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 193
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 193 |
Alan, first "sibilance", now "pejorative"?? Too bad Axiom wasn't around in the 70's when I took the SATs. Maybe I would have scored better on the verbal part of the test. It could have been Princeton, instead of Rutgers.
John
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,486
Members15,617
|
Most Online2,082 Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
0 members (),
1,033
guests, and
3
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|