Re: Axioms vs. Paradigm
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,034
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,034 |
Hi guys,
Would like to expand(of maybe contract)on one point if I may; And that is on "Forewardness" as relates to M3s.
In my experience only; when listening to my M3s I find them to place the vocalist right at the plane of the TV, while the M50s put the sound "about" one foot foreward. I know that statement is derived only from a population of one, but it's what I've found in "my" room. I also believe the M50s have a tad better midrange as well. (I did another A/B test on the M3/M50s the other night just before putting the M3s in back, just to see if my original observations a few weeks ago were still valid)
They were.
|
|
|
Re: Axioms vs. Paradigm
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379 Likes: 7
axiomite
|
axiomite
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,379 Likes: 7 |
Interesting... so the M50s would be closer to M2/M22s in sound than even the M3s were.
M60ti, VP180, QS8, M2ti, EP500, PC-Plus 20-39 M5HP, M40ti, Sierra-1 LFR1100 active, ADA1500-4 and -8
|
|
|
Re: Axioms vs. Paradigm
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,034
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,034 |
Again, that's from only one isolated individual, but it is my take on the situation.
I should expand on that-my testing was a very simple "Plunk 'em down and listen" evaluation. The test, as such, was followed a few weeks later with a similar test with similar results.
I really dig my M3s, but these new kids seem to be...
Last edited by F107plus5; 04/18/05 01:12 PM.
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,946
Posts442,492
Members15,617
|
Most Online2,082 Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
0 members (),
629
guests, and
2
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|