|
Re: NAD sounds sweet!!
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 608
aficionado
|
aficionado
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 608 |
if money is not an issue,id say buy all the power you can...ron
|
|
|
Re: NAD sounds sweet!!
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 295
local
|
local
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 295 |
I just saw a NAD C352 Refurb for about $450.
80W x 2 Continuous Power (8 ohms)
115W, 185W, 240W Dynamic Power into 8, 4 and 2 ohms respectively.
Why would anyone recommend these over a couple of Outlaw M200 Monoblocks?
Excuse my stupidity...just trying to get an idea.
Thanks,
------------------------------------- Denon 4308 M80x2,VP150,EP600,4xQS8
|
|
|
Re: NAD sounds sweet!!
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 164
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 164 |
I just found out the C352 doesn't have a phono input, so it looks like I'll be going with the C372. I didn't want to buy a phono pre so this will work out just fine. Can't wait to spin some vinyl.
|
|
|
Re: NAD sounds sweet!!
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 40
buff
|
buff
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 40 |
The c372 doesn't have it either , just thought i'd let ya know.
Cheers
Al
|
|
|
Re: NAD sounds sweet!!
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,444 Likes: 16
connoisseur
|
connoisseur
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,444 Likes: 16 |
Because they have more current. Over 100 amps.
|
|
|
Re: NAD sounds sweet!!
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 164
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 164 |
I brought home the C352 (and NAD PP2 phono pre) and I'm very pleased with the results. I now have more gain thanks to the phono pre and I can also spin vinyl at louder volumes without having the music break-up and distort. The overall sound of my Rega P3, Grado Sonata and the NAD is really wonderful.
|
|
|
Re: NAD sounds sweet!!
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 86
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 86 |
I knew you would like the 352. As I said before, the 372 would have been a waste of your money unless you like insanely loud music or have a barn to fill. Again, I love my NAD with the 60's.
|
|
|
Re: NAD sounds sweet!!
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 164
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 164 |
Todd, I have a question. When going from my receiver (pre-out) to my integrated I am still able to use the volume control on my receiver. Shouldn't the volume be by-passed? I though I would be using only the amp in the integrated.
|
|
|
Re: NAD sounds sweet!!
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654
shareholder in the making
|
shareholder in the making
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,654 |
No, DT, volume control takes place at the preamp/processor stage, so it's already taken effect when the signal leaves the pre-outs on your receiver.
-----------------------------------
Enjoy the music, not the equipment.
|
|
|
Re: NAD sounds sweet!!
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 164
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 164 |
John, I want to run my 2 channel music through the NAD, should I run it directly into the integrated amp as opposed to the receiver?
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics24,945
Posts442,489
Members15,617
|
Most Online2,082 Jan 22nd, 2020
|
|
0 members (),
1,092
guests, and
2
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|